Over 0–100 km/h, A3 Sportback wins (8,19 s vs 8,36 s).
Performance comparison
Simulated drag race 0 → 1,000 m in real time. Synchronised speed counters and stopwatch. Physics calibration on 7 manufacturer measurements.
Simulation
Calibration
Physics model calibrated on manufacturer splits. The limited top speed is not the real aerodynamic top speed of the vehicles.
| DS9 E-Tense 250 | A3 Sportback | |
|---|---|---|
| 0–100 km/h | 8,36 s | 8,19 s+0,17 s |
| 400 m standing start | 16,22 s | 15,96 s+0,26 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 28,57 s−0,42 s | 28,99 s |
| Top speed (electronically limited) | 235 km/h+3 km/h | 232 km/h |
| Power-to-weight ratio | 7,51 kg/hpbetter ratio | 9,40 kg/hp |
Standing-start drag race, calibrated on manufacturer splits. The gap shows at each stage.
Simulated performance at each stage. Winner in green.
| Palier | DS9 E-Tense 250 | A3 Sportback |
|---|---|---|
| 0–30 km/h | 2,40 s | 1,83 s |
| 0–50 km/h | 4,01 s | 3,06 s |
| 0–80 km/h | 6,47 s | 5,62 s |
| 0–100 km/h | 8,36 s | 8,19 s |
| 0–120 km/h | 10,88 s | 11,23 s |
| 0–160 km/h | 18,12 s | 20,30 s |
| 0–200 km/h | 31,70 s | 38,18 s |
| 400 m standing start | 16,22 s | 15,96 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 28,57 s | 28,99 s |
| Top speed | 235 km/h | 232 km/h |
Manufacturer technical specifications. The power-to-weight ratio is the key physical factor in a drag race.
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 253 hp | Pending |
| Torque | 520 Nm | |
| Weight | 1 900 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | - | |
| Gearbox | 8-speed automatic |
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 150 hp | Pending |
| Torque | 360 Nm | |
| Weight | 1 410 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Traction | |
| Gearbox | 7-speed S tronic |
Off the line, the A3 Sportback hits 100 km/h in 8.19 s versus 8.36 s for the DS9 E-Tense 250. Despite lacking instant torque, 150 hp of power compensates. At this point, the A3 Sportback leads by 0.17 s and sits roughly 18 m ahead.
At 200 metres, the A3 Sportback is doing 115 km/h against 121 km/h for the DS9 E-Tense 250. The gap is 0.55 s. The gap widens compared to the 0-100.
At 400 metres standing start, the A3 Sportback crosses the line in 15.95 s versus 16.22 s. The 0.26 s gap represents roughly 11 m of track - two to three car lengths.
Past 400 metres, the situation changes. Past 400 metres, both rivals hit the same electronic ceiling at 232 km/h. Neither can claw back ground through top speed - the outcome hinges on the acceleration curve between 100 and 232 km/h.
At 1,000 metres, the DS9 E-Tense 250 finishes in 28.57 s versus 28.98 s. The 0.42 s delta shows an extremely tight race.
Instant electric torque gives an advantage off the line. The higher top speed of the combustion engine gives an advantage over longer distances. The distance at which one catches the other depends on the top speed differential.
In European road use (130 km/h max), both vehicles reach the legal speed limit in under 13.06 seconds. The 0.17 s difference in 0 to 100 km/h is mostly felt in motorway merging and overtaking.
Over 0–100 km/h, A3 Sportback wins (8,19 s vs 8,36 s).
DS9 E-Tense 250 goes from 0 to 100 km/h in 8,36 seconds (calibrated simulation).
DS9 E-Tense 250: 253 hp, ratio 7,51 kg/hp. A3 Sportback: 150 hp, ratio 9,40 kg/hp.
DS9 E-Tense 250: 235 km/h. A3 Sportback: 232 km/h.