Over 0–100 km/h, 812 Superfast and Aventador LP700 are neck and neck (2,88 s vs 2,93 s, no significant gap).
Performance comparison
Simulated drag race 0 → 1,000 m in real time. Synchronised speed counters and stopwatch. Physics calibration on 7 manufacturer measurements.
Simulation
Calibration
Physics model calibrated on manufacturer splits. The limited top speed is not the real aerodynamic top speed of the vehicles.
| 812 Superfast | Aventador LP700 | |
|---|---|---|
| 0–100 km/h | 2,93 s | 2,88 s+0,05 s |
| 400 m standing start | 10,38 s | 10,30 s+0,08 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 18,82 s | 18,54 s+0,28 s |
| Top speed (electronically limited) | 327 km/h | 364 km/h−37 km/h |
| Power-to-weight ratio | 1,91 kg/hpbetter ratio | 2,25 kg/hp |
Standing-start drag race, calibrated on manufacturer splits. The gap shows at each stage.
Simulated performance at each stage. Winner in green.
| Palier | 812 Superfast | Aventador LP700 |
|---|---|---|
| 0–30 km/h | 0,85 s | 0,83 stight gap |
| 0–50 km/h | 1,43 s | 1,39 stight gap |
| 0–80 km/h | 2,29 s | 2,25 stight gap |
| 0–100 km/h | 2,93 s | 2,88 stight gap |
| 0–120 km/h | 3,64 s | 3,52 stight gap |
| 0–160 km/h | 5,54 s | 5,47 stight gap |
| 0–200 km/h | 8,29 s | 8,10 s |
| 400 m standing start | 10,38 s | 10,30 stight gap |
| 1,000 m standing start | 18,82 s | 18,54 s |
| Top speed | 327 km/h | 364 km/h |
Manufacturer technical specifications. The power-to-weight ratio is the key physical factor in a drag race.
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 799 hp | Pending |
| Torque | 718 Nm | |
| Weight | 1 525 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | - | |
| Gearbox | 7-speed dual-clutch |
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 700 hp | Pending |
| Torque | 690 Nm | |
| Weight | 1 575 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | - | |
| Gearbox | 7-speed single-clutch automated |
Off the line, the Aventador LP700 hits 100 km/h in 2.88 s versus 2.93 s for the 812 Superfast. The 0.05 s gap is negligible: both vehicles are neck and neck.
At 200 metres, the Aventador LP700 is doing 183 km/h against 182 km/h for the 812 Superfast. The gap is 0.04 s. The gap remains stable from the start.
At 400 metres standing start, the Aventador LP700 crosses the line in 10.29 s versus 10.37 s. The 0.08 s gap represents roughly 5 m of track - barely a car length.
Past 400 metres, the Aventador LP700 continues to build its lead. At 600 metres, it runs at 254 km/h versus 249 km/h. At 1,000 metres, the Aventador LP700 finishes in 18.54 s versus 18.81 s, with a 0.27 s lead.
On paper, the 812 Superfast combines 799 hp, 718 Nm and 1,525 kg - a clear theoretical edge over the Aventador LP700. Yet the Aventador LP700 launches quicker. At standstill, both motors deliver peak torque from 0 rpm: the decisive factor is no longer raw power, but available grip. If the Aventador LP700 has a better traction coefficient (tyres, weight distribution, traction control calibration), it puts down more force despite inferior specs - exactly what the simulation reflects, calibrated on manufacturer 0-100 km/h times.
With two combustion powertrains, the difference comes down to power-to-weight ratio (1.91 kg/hp vs 2.25 kg/hp) and transmission (Automatic vs Automatic).
In European road use (130 km/h max), both vehicles reach the legal speed limit in under 4.01 seconds. The 0.05 s difference in 0 to 100 km/h is mostly felt in motorway merging and overtaking.
Over 0–100 km/h, 812 Superfast and Aventador LP700 are neck and neck (2,88 s vs 2,93 s, no significant gap).
812 Superfast goes from 0 to 100 km/h in 2,93 seconds (calibrated simulation).
812 Superfast: 799 hp, ratio 1,91 kg/hp. Aventador LP700: 700 hp, ratio 2,25 kg/hp.
812 Superfast: 327 km/h. Aventador LP700: 364 km/h.