Sur 0–100 km/h, 600e 156 gagne (8,92 s vs 10,12 s).
Performance comparison
Simulated drag race 0 → 1,000 m in real time. Synchronised speed counters and stopwatch. Physics calibration on 7 manufacturer measurements.
Simulation
Calibration
Physics model calibrated on manufacturer splits. The limited top speed is not the real aerodynamic top speed of the vehicles.
| 600e 156 | Captur E-Tech Hybrid 145 | |
|---|---|---|
| 0–100 km/h | 8,92 s−1,20 s | 10,12 s |
| 400 m standing start | 16,73 s−0,84 s | 17,57 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 31,23 s−0,05 s | 31,28 s |
| Top speed (electronically limited) | 150 km/h | 172 km/h−22 km/h |
| Power-to-weight ratio | 10,06 kg/hp | 9,76 kg/hpbetter ratio |
Standing-start drag race, calibrated on manufacturer splits. The gap shows at each stage.
Simulated performance at each stage. Winner in green.
| Palier | 600e 156 | Captur E-Tech Hybrid 145 |
|---|---|---|
| 0–30 km/h | 2,38 s | 2,77 s |
| 0–50 km/h | 3,98 s | 4,63 s |
| 0–80 km/h | 6,56 s | 7,51 s |
| 0–100 km/h | 8,92 s | 10,12 s |
| 0–120 km/h | 12,08 s | 13,53 s |
| 0–160 km/h | — | 24,91 s |
| 400 m standing start | 16,73 s | 17,57 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 31,23 s | 31,28 stight gap |
| Top speed | 150 km/h | 172 km/h |
Manufacturer technical specifications. The power-to-weight ratio is the key physical factor in a drag race.
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 156 hp | Pending |
| Torque | 260 Nm | |
| Weight | 1 570 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | 600e 156 | |
| Gearbox | single-speed reducer (BEV) |
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 145 hp | Inline-4 Atkinson cycle E-Tech (HR16) |
| Torque | 205 Nm | |
| Weight | 1 415 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Traction | |
| Gearbox | Multi-mode automatic (E-Tech) |
Off the line, the 600e 156 hits 100 km/h in 8.92 s versus 10.12 s for the Captur E-Tech Hybrid 145. The instant torque of 260 Nm from the electric motor makes the difference. At this point, the 600e 156 leads by 1.20 s and sits roughly 16 m ahead.
At 200 metres, the 600e 156 is doing 115 km/h against 111 km/h for the Captur E-Tech Hybrid 145. The gap is 0.69 s. The challenger starts to claw back ground.
At 400 metres standing start, the 600e 156 crosses the line in 16.73 s versus 17.57 s. The 0.84 s gap represents roughly 32 m of track — a gap visible to the naked eye.
Past 400 metres, the gap narrows. The 600e 156 maxes out at 150 km/h while the Captur E-Tech Hybrid 145 keeps accelerating towards 172 km/h. At 600 metres, the gap has dropped to 0.87 s.
At 1,000 metres, the 600e 156 finishes in 31.23 s versus 31.27 s, with just 0.05 s to spare. The Captur E-Tech Hybrid 145 fails to fully close the launch gap.
Both rivals are electronically governed, but not at the same level: the 600e 156 is capped at 150 km/h, the Captur E-Tech Hybrid 145 at 172 km/h. This isn’t a physical engine limit — it’s a manufacturer choice, usually for tyre safety or homologation reasons. Neither car reaches its true aerodynamic top speed.
Instant electric torque gives an advantage off the line. The higher top speed of the combustion engine gives an advantage over longer distances. The distance at which one catches the other depends on the top speed differential.
In European road use (130 km/h max), both vehicles reach the legal speed limit in under 15.65 seconds. The 1.20 s difference in 0 to 100 km/h is mostly felt in motorway merging and overtaking.
Swap one of the two models to explore an equivalent duel in the same segment.
Sur 0–100 km/h, 600e 156 gagne (8,92 s vs 10,12 s).
600e 156 passe de 0 à 100 km/h en 8,92 secondes (simulation calibrée).
600e 156 : 156 hp, ratio 10,06 kg/hp. Captur E-Tech Hybrid 145 : 145 hp, ratio 9,76 kg/hp.
600e 156 : 150 km/h. Captur E-Tech Hybrid 145 : 172 km/h.