Sur 0–100 km/h, 600e 156 gagne (8,92 s vs 10,20 s).
Performance comparison
Simulated drag race 0 → 1,000 m in real time. Synchronised speed counters and stopwatch. Physics calibration on 7 manufacturer measurements.
Simulation
Calibration
Physics model calibrated on manufacturer splits. The limited top speed is not the real aerodynamic top speed of the vehicles.
| Captur E-Tech Plug-in Hybrid 160 | 600e 156 | |
|---|---|---|
| 0–100 km/h | 10,20 s | 8,92 s+1,28 s |
| 400 m standing start | 17,63 s | 16,73 s+0,90 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 32,56 s | 31,23 s+1,33 s |
| Top speed (electronically limited) | 145 km/h | 150 km/h−5 km/h |
| Power-to-weight ratio | 9,59 kg/hpbetter ratio | 10,06 kg/hp |
Standing-start drag race, calibrated on manufacturer splits. The gap shows at each stage.
Simulated performance at each stage. Winner in green.
| Palier | Captur E-Tech Plug-in Hybrid 160 | 600e 156 |
|---|---|---|
| 0–30 km/h | 2,98 s | 2,38 s |
| 0–50 km/h | 4,66 s | 3,98 s |
| 0–80 km/h | 7,69 s | 6,56 s |
| 0–100 km/h | 10,20 s | 8,92 s |
| 0–120 km/h | 13,33 s | 12,08 s |
| 400 m standing start | 17,63 s | 16,73 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 32,56 s | 31,23 s |
| Top speed | 145 km/h | 150 km/h |
Manufacturer technical specifications. The power-to-weight ratio is the key physical factor in a drag race.
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 159 hp | Pending |
| Torque | 205 Nm | |
| Weight | 1 525 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Traction | |
| Gearbox | Multi-mode automatic |
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 156 hp | Pending |
| Torque | 260 Nm | |
| Weight | 1 570 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | 600e 156 | |
| Gearbox | single-speed reducer (BEV) |
Off the line, the 600e 156 hits 100 km/h in 8.92 s versus 10.20 s for the Captur E-Tech Plug-in Hybrid 160. At this point, the 600e 156 leads by 1.28 s and sits roughly 18 m ahead.
At 200 metres, the 600e 156 is doing 115 km/h against 112 km/h for the Captur E-Tech Plug-in Hybrid 160. The gap is 0.79 s. The challenger starts to claw back ground.
At 400 metres standing start, the 600e 156 crosses the line in 16.73 s versus 17.63 s. The 0.90 s gap represents roughly 34 m of track — a gap visible to the naked eye.
Past 400 metres, the 600e 156 continues to build its lead. At 600 metres, it runs at 150 km/h versus 145 km/h. At 1,000 metres, the 600e 156 finishes in 31.23 s versus 32.56 s, with a 1.34 s lead. Both vehicles have similar top speeds (145 vs 150 km/h), preventing any comeback.
Both rivals are electronically governed, but not at the same level: the Captur E-Tech Plug-in Hybrid 160 is capped at 145 km/h, the 600e 156 at 150 km/h. This isn’t a physical engine limit — it’s a manufacturer choice, usually for tyre safety or homologation reasons. Neither car reaches its true aerodynamic top speed.
With two plug-in hybrid powertrains, the difference comes down to power-to-weight ratio (9.59 kg/hp vs 10.06 kg/hp) and transmission (Automatic vs Automatic).
In European road use (130 km/h max), both vehicles reach the legal speed limit in under 15.65 seconds. The 1.28 s difference in 0 to 100 km/h is mostly felt in motorway merging and overtaking.
Swap one of the two models to explore an equivalent duel in the same segment.
Sur 0–100 km/h, 600e 156 gagne (8,92 s vs 10,20 s).
Captur E-Tech Plug-in Hybrid 160 passe de 0 à 100 km/h en 10,20 secondes (simulation calibrée).
Captur E-Tech Plug-in Hybrid 160 : 159 hp, ratio 9,59 kg/hp. 600e 156 : 156 hp, ratio 10,06 kg/hp.
Captur E-Tech Plug-in Hybrid 160 : 145 km/h. 600e 156 : 150 km/h.