Skip to main content
CaralogyCaralogy
HomeBrandsRoad TripBudgetDuelGuides
Caralogy

The car comparison platform. Physics simulation, road trips, real costs.

Navigation
All brandsCar duelRunning costsMotorwayMethodology
Simulators
Motorway simulatorRunning costsPerformance duel
Brands
VolkswagenBMWMercedesToyotaTeslaAudi
FRENDEESIT
© 2026 Caralogy · All rights reserved
  1. Home
  2. /Duel
  3. /SUV
AExplorerPetrolvsBModel 3BEV
  • MotorwayMotorwayRange and charging
  • PerformancePerformance0-100, top speed
  • ConsumptionConsumptionYearly cost
  • SpecsExplorer · Model 3

Ford Explorer EcoBoost 300 vs Tesla Model 3 Long Range RWD: which is truly faster?

Simulated drag race 0 → 1,000 m in real time. Synchronised speed counters and stopwatch. Physics calibration on 7 manufacturer measurements.

large SUV · 2020 vs 2018 · Methodology
FordPetrol

Explorer EcoBoost 300

305 hp · 420 Nm · 2,043 kg · 2020

VS
TeslaBEVFaster

Model 3 Long Range RWD

258 hp · 446 Nm · 1,730 kg · 2018

Result · 0–100 km/h

AFord Explorer EcoBoost 300

6.71 s

Gap0.99 sin favour of Model 3 Long Range RWD
BTesla Model 3 Long Range RWD

5.72 s

Summary · Caralogy simulation
MeasureExplorer EcoBoost 300Model 3 Long Range RWDGap
0–100 km/h6.71 s5.72 s0.99 s · Model 3 Long Range RWD
400 m standing start14.93 s14.16 s0.77 s · Model 3 Long Range RWD
1,000 m standing start27.10 s26.28 s0.82 s · Model 3 Long Range RWD
Top speed (electronically limited)220 km/h224 km/h4 km/h · Model 3 Long Range RWD
Power-to-weight ratio6.70 kg/hp6.71 kg/hpbetter ratio · Explorer EcoBoost 300

Watch the race

Standing-start drag race, calibrated on manufacturer splits. The gap shows at each stage.

FordPetrolExplorer EcoBoost 300
Speed
0km/h
Timer
0,00s
Distance
0m
TeslaBEVModel 3 Long Range RWD
Speed
0km/h
Timer
0,00s
Distance
0m
100 m
200 m
300 m
400 m
500 m
600 m
700 m
800 m
900 m
1000 m
0m → 1000m
Gap0m

Stage-by-stage comparison

Simulated performance at each stage. Best value in bold.
StageExplorer EcoBoost 300Model 3 Long Range RWD
0–30 km/h1.82 s1.51 s
0–50 km/h3.04 s2.52 s
0–80 km/h4.96 s4.19 s
0–100 km/h6.71 s5.72 s
0–120 km/h8.99 s7.74 s
0–160 km/h15.83 s14.66 s
0–200 km/h30.71 s29.94 s
400 m standing start14.93 s14.16 s
1,000 m standing start27.10 s26.28 s
Top speed220 km/h224 km/h

Parameters and assumptions

Simulation

Start
Standing, straight line
Surface
Dry asphalt, 23°C
Wind
None
Driver
1 person, 75 kg

Calibration

Splits
0–100, 0–200 manufacturer
Power curve
Real measurement (Caralogy)
VMax
Manufacturer limited
Transmission
Losses integrated in model

Physics model calibrated on manufacturer splits. The limited top speed is not the real aerodynamic top speed of the vehicles.

Under the bonnet

Manufacturer technical specifications. The power-to-weight ratio is the key physical factor in a drag race.

Ford

Explorer EcoBoost 300

6,70kg/hpratio better by 0,01 kg/hp
CharacteristicValueDetail
Power305 hpPending
Torque420 Nm
Weight2 043 kgmanufacturer kerb weight
DrivetrainIntegrale (AWD)
Gearbox10-speed torque-converter automatic
Tesla

Model 3 Long Range RWD

6,71kg/hpcompensated by −313 kg
CharacteristicValueDetail
Power258 hpPermanent Magnet Synchronous Motor
Torque446 Nm
Weight1 730 kgmanufacturer kerb weight
DrivetrainPropulsion
GearboxSingle-speed fixed gear

The start: 0 to 100 km/h

Off the line, the Model 3 Long Range RWD hits 100 km/h in 5.72 s versus 6.71 s for the Explorer EcoBoost 300. The instant torque of 446 Nm from the electric motor makes the difference. At this point, the Model 3 Long Range RWD leads by 0.99 s and sits roughly 13 m ahead.

From 100 km/h to 400 metres

At 200 metres, the Model 3 Long Range RWD is doing 131 km/h against 127 km/h for the Explorer EcoBoost 300. The gap is 0.65 s. The challenger starts to claw back ground.

At 400 metres standing start, the Model 3 Long Range RWD crosses the line in 14.16 s versus 14.92 s. The 0.77 s gap represents roughly 33 m of track - a gap visible to the naked eye.

Beyond 400 metres: top speed comes into play

Past 400 metres, the Model 3 Long Range RWD continues to build its lead. At 600 metres, it runs at 174 km/h versus 173 km/h. At 1,000 metres, the Model 3 Long Range RWD finishes in 26.28 s versus 27.09 s, with a 0.81 s lead. Both vehicles have similar top speeds (220 vs 224 km/h), preventing any comeback.

What the numbers don’t tell you

Both rivals are electronically governed, but not at the same level: the Explorer EcoBoost 300 is capped at 220 km/h, the Model 3 Long Range RWD at 225 km/h. This isn’t a physical engine limit - it’s a manufacturer choice, usually for tyre safety or homologation reasons. Neither car reaches its true aerodynamic top speed.

Instant electric torque gives an advantage off the line. The higher top speed of the combustion engine gives an advantage over longer distances. The distance at which one catches the other depends on the top speed differential.

In European road use (130 km/h max), both vehicles reach the legal speed limit in under 10.35 seconds. The 0.99 s difference in 0 to 100 km/h is mostly felt in motorway merging and overtaking.

Other duels you might be interested in

FordVSPorsche

Explorer EcoBoost 300 vs Cayenne (6-speed manual)

BMWVSTesla

i4 eDrive35 vs Model 3 Long Range RWD

FordVSPorsche

Explorer EcoBoost 300 vs Cayenne (6-speed manual)

VolvoVSTesla

V60 T8 AWD Recharge vs Model 3 Long Range RWD

Frequently asked questions

Over 0–100 km/h, Model 3 Long Range RWD wins (5,72 s vs 6,71 s).

Explorer EcoBoost 300 goes from 0 to 100 km/h in 6,71 seconds (calibrated simulation).

Explorer EcoBoost 300: 305 hp, ratio 6,70 kg/hp. Model 3 Long Range RWD: 258 hp, ratio 6,71 kg/hp.

Explorer EcoBoost 300: 220 km/h. Model 3 Long Range RWD: 224 km/h.