Over 0–100 km/h, Model Y Juniper RWD wins (6,04 s vs 6,71 s).
Performance comparison
Simulated drag race 0 → 1,000 m in real time. Synchronised speed counters and stopwatch. Physics calibration on 7 manufacturer measurements.
Simulation
Calibration
Physics model calibrated on manufacturer splits. The limited top speed is not the real aerodynamic top speed of the vehicles.
| Explorer EcoBoost 300 | Model Y Juniper RWD | |
|---|---|---|
| 0–100 km/h | 6,71 s | 6,04 s+0,67 s |
| 400 m standing start | 14,93 s | 14,25 s+0,68 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 27,10 s | 25,58 s+1,52 s |
| Top speed (electronically limited) | 220 km/h+11 km/h | 209 km/h |
| Power-to-weight ratio | 6,70 kg/hp | 6,20 kg/hpbetter ratio |
Standing-start drag race, calibrated on manufacturer splits. The gap shows at each stage.
Simulated performance at each stage. Winner in green.
| Palier | Explorer EcoBoost 300 | Model Y Juniper RWD |
|---|---|---|
| 0–30 km/h | 1,82 s | 1,74 stight gap |
| 0–50 km/h | 3,04 s | 2,91 stight gap |
| 0–80 km/h | 4,96 s | 4,67 s |
| 0–100 km/h | 6,71 s | 6,04 s |
| 0–120 km/h | 8,99 s | 7,80 s |
| 0–160 km/h | 15,83 s | 13,29 s |
| 0–200 km/h | 30,71 s | 22,11 s |
| 400 m standing start | 14,93 s | 14,25 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 27,10 s | 25,58 s |
| Top speed | 220 km/h | 209 km/h |
Manufacturer technical specifications. The power-to-weight ratio is the key physical factor in a drag race.
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 305 hp | Pending |
| Torque | 420 Nm | |
| Weight | 2 043 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Integrale (AWD) | |
| Gearbox | 10-speed torque-converter automatic |
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 299 hp | Permanent Magnet Synchronous Motor |
| Torque | 419 Nm | |
| Weight | 1 853 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Propulsion | |
| Gearbox | Single-speed fixed gear |
Off the line, the Model Y Juniper RWD hits 100 km/h in 6.04 s versus 6.71 s for the Explorer EcoBoost 300. The instant torque of 419 Nm from the electric motor makes the difference. At this point, the Model Y Juniper RWD leads by 0.67 s and sits roughly 5 m ahead.
At 200 metres, the Model Y Juniper RWD is doing 135 km/h against 127 km/h for the Explorer EcoBoost 300. The gap is 0.39 s. The challenger starts to claw back ground.
At 400 metres standing start, the Model Y Juniper RWD crosses the line in 14.24 s versus 14.92 s. The 0.68 s gap represents roughly 29 m of track - two to three car lengths.
Past 400 metres, the Model Y Juniper RWD continues to build its lead. At 600 metres, it runs at 185 km/h versus 173 km/h. At 1,000 metres, the Model Y Juniper RWD finishes in 25.58 s versus 27.09 s, with a 1.51 s lead. Both vehicles have similar top speeds (220 vs 209 km/h), preventing any comeback.
Both rivals are electronically governed, but not at the same level: the Explorer EcoBoost 300 is capped at 220 km/h, the Model Y Juniper RWD at 209 km/h. This isn’t a physical engine limit - it’s a manufacturer choice, usually for tyre safety or homologation reasons. Neither car reaches its true aerodynamic top speed.
Instant electric torque gives an advantage off the line. The higher top speed of the combustion engine gives an advantage over longer distances. The distance at which one catches the other depends on the top speed differential.
In European road use (130 km/h max), both vehicles reach the legal speed limit in under 10.35 seconds. The 0.67 s difference in 0 to 100 km/h is mostly felt in motorway merging and overtaking.
Over 0–100 km/h, Model Y Juniper RWD wins (6,04 s vs 6,71 s).
Explorer EcoBoost 300 goes from 0 to 100 km/h in 6,71 seconds (calibrated simulation).
Explorer EcoBoost 300: 305 hp, ratio 6,70 kg/hp. Model Y Juniper RWD: 299 hp, ratio 6,20 kg/hp.
Explorer EcoBoost 300: 220 km/h. Model Y Juniper RWD: 209 km/h.