Sur 0–100 km/h, Mustang Mach-E RWD gagne (6,04 s vs 7,65 s).
Performance comparison
Simulated drag race 0 → 1,000 m in real time. Synchronised speed counters and stopwatch. Physics calibration on 7 manufacturer measurements.
Simulation
Calibration
Physics model calibrated on manufacturer splits. The limited top speed is not the real aerodynamic top speed of the vehicles.
| Mustang Mach-E RWD | 3008 Hybrid 225 e-EAT8 | |
|---|---|---|
| 0–100 km/h | 6,04 s−1,61 s | 7,65 s |
| 400 m standing start | 14,39 s−1,29 s | 15,68 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 26,74 s−1,51 s | 28,25 s |
| Top speed (electronically limited) | 180 km/h | 233 km/h−53 km/h |
| Power-to-weight ratio | 7,01 kg/hpbetter ratio | 8,22 kg/hp |
Standing-start drag race, calibrated on manufacturer splits. The gap shows at each stage.
Simulated performance at each stage. Winner in green.
| Palier | Mustang Mach-E RWD | 3008 Hybrid 225 e-EAT8 |
|---|---|---|
| 0–30 km/h | 1,57 s | 2,01 s |
| 0–50 km/h | 2,63 s | 3,35 s |
| 0–80 km/h | 4,39 s | 5,58 s |
| 0–100 km/h | 6,04 s | 7,65 s |
| 0–120 km/h | 8,18 s | 10,33 s |
| 0–160 km/h | 14,98 s | 18,22 s |
| 0–200 km/h | — | 33,56 s |
| 400 m standing start | 14,39 s | 15,68 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 26,74 s | 28,25 s |
| Top speed | 180 km/h | 233 km/h |
Manufacturer technical specifications. The power-to-weight ratio is the key physical factor in a drag race.
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 269 hp | Pending |
| Torque | 430 Nm | |
| Weight | 1 886 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Propulsion | |
| Gearbox | single-speed reduction |
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 225 hp | 4 cyl |
| Torque | 360 Nm | |
| Weight | 1 850 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Traction | |
| Gearbox | 8-speed automatic (EAT8) |
Off the line, the Mustang Mach-E RWD hits 100 km/h in 6.04 s versus 7.65 s for the 3008 Hybrid 225 e-EAT8. At this point, the Mustang Mach-E RWD leads by 1.61 s and sits roughly 17 m ahead.
At 200 metres, the Mustang Mach-E RWD is doing 129 km/h against 120 km/h for the 3008 Hybrid 225 e-EAT8. The gap is 0.98 s. The challenger starts to claw back ground.
At 400 metres standing start, the Mustang Mach-E RWD crosses the line in 14.39 s versus 15.68 s. The 1.29 s gap represents roughly 52 m of track — a gap visible to the naked eye.
Past 400 metres, the Mustang Mach-E RWD continues to build its lead. At 600 metres, it runs at 175 km/h versus 167 km/h. At 1,000 metres, the Mustang Mach-E RWD finishes in 26.73 s versus 28.25 s, with a 1.51 s lead. Despite a higher top speed (233 km/h), the 3008 Hybrid 225 e-EAT8 never recovers its launch deficit.
Electronically capped at 180 km/h, the Mustang Mach-E RWD never reaches its natural aerodynamic ceiling in this duel. That’s not a physical limit of the motor — it’s a deliberate manufacturer decision, typically tied to standard-fit tyre ratings or model-range positioning.
With two plug-in hybrid powertrains, the difference comes down to power-to-weight ratio (7.01 kg/hp vs 8.22 kg/hp) and transmission (Automatic vs Automatic).
In European road use (130 km/h max), both vehicles reach the legal speed limit in under 11.95 seconds. The 1.61 s difference in 0 to 100 km/h is mostly felt in motorway merging and overtaking.
Swap one of the two models to explore an equivalent duel in the same segment.
Sur 0–100 km/h, Mustang Mach-E RWD gagne (6,04 s vs 7,65 s).
Mustang Mach-E RWD passe de 0 à 100 km/h en 6,04 secondes (simulation calibrée).
Mustang Mach-E RWD : 269 hp, ratio 7,01 kg/hp. 3008 Hybrid 225 e-EAT8 : 225 hp, ratio 8,22 kg/hp.
Mustang Mach-E RWD : 180 km/h. 3008 Hybrid 225 e-EAT8 : 233 km/h.