Over 0–100 km/h, e:Ny1 wins (7,76 s vs 8,35 s).
Simulated drag race 0 → 1,000 m in real time. Synchronised speed counters and stopwatch. Physics calibration on 7 manufacturer measurements.
| Measure | e:Ny1 | E-PACE P200 | Gap |
|---|---|---|---|
| 0–100 km/h | 7.76 s | 8.35 s | 0.59 s · e:Ny1 |
| 400 m standing start | 15.82 s | 16.19 s | 0.37 s · e:Ny1 |
| 1,000 m standing start | 29.41 s | 29.41 s | Same |
| Top speed (electronically limited) | 160 km/h | 215 km/h | 55 km/h · E-PACE P200 |
| Power-to-weight ratio | 8.34 kg/hp | 8.74 kg/hp | better ratio · e:Ny1 |
Standing-start drag race, calibrated on manufacturer splits. The gap shows at each stage.
| Stage | e:Ny1 | E-PACE P200 |
|---|---|---|
| 0–30 km/h | 2.17 s | 1.98 s |
| 0–50 km/h | 3.63 s | 3.33 s |
| 0–80 km/h | 5.87 s · tight gap | 5.88 s |
| 0–100 km/h | 7.76 s | 8.35 s |
| 0–120 km/h | 10.24 s | 11.44 s |
| 0–160 km/h | 18.60 s | 21.17 s |
| 0–200 km/h | - | 45.14 s |
| 400 m standing start | 15.82 s | 16.19 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 29.41 s | 29.41 s |
| Top speed | 160 km/h | 215 km/h |
Physics model calibrated on manufacturer splits. The limited top speed is not the real aerodynamic top speed of the vehicles.
Manufacturer technical specifications. The power-to-weight ratio is the key physical factor in a drag race.
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 201 hp | Permanent Magnet Synchronous Motor |
| Torque | 310 Nm | |
| Weight | 1 677 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Traction | |
| Gearbox | Single-speed fixed gear |
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 200 hp | Pending |
| Torque | 320 Nm | |
| Weight | 1 748 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | - | |
| Gearbox | 9-speed automatic ZF |
Off the line, the e:Ny1 hits 100 km/h in 7.76 s versus 8.35 s for the E-PACE P200. The instant torque of 310 Nm from the electric motor makes the difference. Despite the faster sprint time, the E-PACE P200 is 2 m further along the track at this moment: stronger low-speed acceleration offsets a slower run beyond 100 km/h.
At 200 metres, the e:Ny1 is doing 122 km/h against 115 km/h for the E-PACE P200. The gap is 0.07 s. The challenger starts to claw back ground.
At 400 metres standing start, the e:Ny1 crosses the line in 15.82 s versus 16.19 s. The 0.37 s gap represents roughly 15 m of track - two to three car lengths.
Past 400 metres, the gap narrows. The e:Ny1 maxes out at 160 km/h while the E-PACE P200 keeps accelerating towards 215 km/h. At 600 metres, the gap is down to 0.54 s from 0.37 s at 400 metres.
At 1,000 metres, the e:Ny1 finishes in 29.40 s versus 29.41 s, with just 0.01 s to spare. The E-PACE P200 fails to fully close the launch gap.
Both rivals are electronically governed, but not at the same level: the e:Ny1 is capped at 160 km/h, the E-PACE P200 at 215 km/h. This isn’t a physical engine limit - it’s a manufacturer choice, usually for tyre safety or homologation reasons. Neither car reaches its true aerodynamic top speed.
Instant electric torque gives an advantage off the line. The higher top speed of the combustion engine gives an advantage over longer distances. The distance at which one catches the other depends on the top speed differential.
In European road use (130 km/h max), both vehicles reach the legal speed limit in under 13.46 seconds. The 0.59 s difference in 0 to 100 km/h is mostly felt in motorway merging and overtaking.
Over 0–100 km/h, e:Ny1 wins (7,76 s vs 8,35 s).
e:Ny1 goes from 0 to 100 km/h in 7,76 seconds (calibrated simulation).
e:Ny1: 201 hp, ratio 8,34 kg/hp. E-PACE P200: 200 hp, ratio 8,74 kg/hp.
e:Ny1: 160 km/h. E-PACE P200: 215 km/h.