Skip to main content
CaralogyCaralogy
HomeBrandsRoad TripBudgetDuelGuides
Caralogy

The car comparison platform. Physics simulation, road trips, real costs.

Navigation
All brandsCar duelRunning costsMotorwayMethodology
Simulators
Motorway simulatorRunning costsPerformance duel
Brands
VolkswagenBMWMercedesToyotaTeslaAudi
FRENDEESIT
© 2026 Caralogy · All rights reserved
  1. Home
  2. /Duel
  3. /SUV
AE-PACEPetrolvsBX1Diesel
  • MotorwayMotorwayRange and charging
  • PerformancePerformance0-100, top speed
  • ConsumptionConsumptionYearly cost
  • SpecsE-PACE · X1

Jaguar E-PACE P200 vs BMW X1 sDrive20d U11: which is truly faster?

Simulated drag race 0 → 1,000 m in real time. Synchronised speed counters and stopwatch. Physics calibration on 7 manufacturer measurements.

compact SUV · 2018 vs 2024 · Methodology
JaguarPetrol

E-PACE P200

200 hp · 320 Nm · 1,748 kg · 2018

VS
BMWDiesel

X1 sDrive20d U11

163 hp · 400 Nm · 1,610 kg · 2024

Result · 0–100 km/h

AJaguar E-PACE P200

8.35 s

Gap0.03 sNot a significant gap
BBMW X1 sDrive20d U11

8.38 s

Summary · Caralogy simulation
MeasureE-PACE P200X1 sDrive20d U11Gap
0–100 km/h8.35 s8.38 s0.03 s · E-PACE P200
400 m standing start16.19 s16.20 s0.01 s · E-PACE P200
1,000 m standing start29.41 s29.75 s0.34 s · E-PACE P200
Top speed (electronically limited)215 km/h210 km/h5 km/h · E-PACE P200
Power-to-weight ratio8.74 kg/hp9.88 kg/hpbetter ratio · E-PACE P200

Watch the race

Standing-start drag race, calibrated on manufacturer splits. The gap shows at each stage.

JaguarPetrolE-PACE P200
Speed
0km/h
Timer
0,00s
Distance
0m
BMWDieselX1 sDrive20d U11
Speed
0km/h
Timer
0,00s
Distance
0m
100 m
200 m
300 m
400 m
500 m
600 m
700 m
800 m
900 m
1000 m
0m → 1000m
Gap0m

Stage-by-stage comparison

Simulated performance at each stage. Best value in bold.
StageE-PACE P200X1 sDrive20d U11
0–30 km/h1.98 s1.88 s · tight gap
0–50 km/h3.33 s3.09 s
0–80 km/h5.88 s5.77 s · tight gap
0–100 km/h8.35 s · tight gap8.38 s
0–120 km/h11.44 s11.82 s
0–160 km/h21.17 s22.77 s
0–200 km/h45.14 s52.85 s
400 m standing start16.19 s · tight gap16.20 s
1,000 m standing start29.41 s29.75 s
Top speed215 km/h210 km/h

Parameters and assumptions

Simulation

Start
Standing, straight line
Surface
Dry asphalt, 23°C
Wind
None
Driver
1 person, 75 kg

Calibration

Splits
0–100, 0–200 manufacturer
Power curve
Real measurement (Caralogy)
VMax
Manufacturer limited
Transmission
Losses integrated in model

Physics model calibrated on manufacturer splits. The limited top speed is not the real aerodynamic top speed of the vehicles.

Under the bonnet

Manufacturer technical specifications. The power-to-weight ratio is the key physical factor in a drag race.

Jaguar

E-PACE P200

8,74kg/hpratio better by 1,14 kg/hp
CharacteristicValueDetail
Power200 hpPending
Torque320 Nm
Weight1 748 kgmanufacturer kerb weight
Drivetrain-
Gearbox9-speed automatic ZF
BMW

X1 sDrive20d U11

9,88kg/hpcompensated by −138 kg
CharacteristicValueDetail
Power163 hp4 cyl
Torque400 Nm
Weight1 610 kgmanufacturer kerb weight
Drivetrain-
GearboxSeven-speed Steptronic transmission with double clutch

The start: 0 to 100 km/h

Off the line, the E-PACE P200 hits 100 km/h in 8.35 s versus 8.38 s for the X1 sDrive20d. The 0.03 s gap is negligible: both vehicles are neck and neck.

From 100 km/h to 400 metres

At 200 metres, the X1 sDrive20d is doing 113 km/h against 115 km/h for the E-PACE P200. The gap is 0.09 s. The gap widens compared to the 0-100.

At 400 metres standing start, the E-PACE P200 crosses the line in 16.19 s versus 16.20 s. The 0.01 s gap represents roughly 0 m of track

Beyond 400 metres: top speed comes into play

Past 400 metres, the E-PACE P200 continues to build its lead. At 600 metres, it runs at 159 km/h versus 155 km/h. At 1,000 metres, the E-PACE P200 finishes in 29.41 s versus 29.75 s, with a 0.34 s lead. Both vehicles have similar top speeds (215 vs 210 km/h), preventing any comeback.

What the numbers don’t tell you

Both rivals are electronically governed, but not at the same level: the E-PACE P200 is capped at 215 km/h, the X1 sDrive20d at 210 km/h. This isn’t a physical engine limit - it’s a manufacturer choice, usually for tyre safety or homologation reasons. Neither car reaches its true aerodynamic top speed.

With two combustion powertrains, the difference comes down to power-to-weight ratio (8.74 kg/hp vs 9.88 kg/hp) and transmission (Automatic vs Automatic).

In European road use (130 km/h max), both vehicles reach the legal speed limit in under 13.95 seconds. The 0.03 s difference in 0 to 100 km/h is mostly felt in motorway merging and overtaking.

Compare with other alternatives

Swap one of the two models to explore an equivalent duel in the same segment.

Instead of E-PACE P200
Audi Q3 SportbackAudi Q3 SUVAudi Q3 Sportback
Instead of X1 sDrive20d U11
Audi Q3 SUVAudi Q3 Sportback TFSI quattro S tronic 150 kWAudi Q3 Sportback

Other duels you might be interested in

JaguarVSVolvo

E-PACE P200 vs XC40 B4

BMWVSAudi

X1 sDrive20d vs Q3 Sportback

AudiVSJaguar

Q3 Sportback TFSI quattro S tronic 150 kW vs E-PACE P200

BMWVSPeugeot

X1 sDrive20d vs 3008 BlueHDi 130 EAT8

Frequently asked questions

Over 0–100 km/h, E-PACE P200 and X1 sDrive20d U11 are neck and neck (8,35 s vs 8,38 s, no significant gap).

E-PACE P200 goes from 0 to 100 km/h in 8,35 seconds (calibrated simulation).

E-PACE P200: 200 hp, ratio 8,74 kg/hp. X1 sDrive20d U11: 163 hp, ratio 9,88 kg/hp.

E-PACE P200: 215 km/h. X1 sDrive20d U11: 210 km/h.