Over 0–100 km/h, Compass 4xe wins (7,58 s vs 8,05 s).
Performance comparison
Simulated drag race 0 → 1,000 m in real time. Synchronised speed counters and stopwatch. Physics calibration on 7 manufacturer measurements.
Simulation
Calibration
Physics model calibrated on manufacturer splits. The limited top speed is not the real aerodynamic top speed of the vehicles.
| Scenic E-Tech Electric 220 | Compass 4xe | |
|---|---|---|
| 0–100 km/h | 8,05 s | 7,58 s+0,47 s |
| 400 m standing start | 16,06 s | 15,62 s+0,44 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 28,98 s | 28,88 s+0,10 s |
| Top speed (electronically limited) | 233 km/h+33 km/h | 200 km/h |
| Power-to-weight ratio | 9,12 kg/hpbetter ratio | 9,56 kg/hp |
Standing-start drag race, calibrated on manufacturer splits. The gap shows at each stage.
Simulated performance at each stage. Winner in green.
| Palier | Scenic E-Tech Electric 220 | Compass 4xe |
|---|---|---|
| 0–30 km/h | 2,24 s | 1,62 s |
| 0–50 km/h | 3,75 s | 2,72 s |
| 0–80 km/h | 6,07 s | 5,25 s |
| 0–100 km/h | 8,05 s | 7,58 s |
| 0–120 km/h | 10,66 s | 10,77 stight gap |
| 0–160 km/h | 19,80 s | 20,78 s |
| 0–200 km/h | 38,38 s | 50,50 s |
| 400 m standing start | 16,06 s | 15,62 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 28,98 s | 28,88 stight gap |
| Top speed | 233 km/h | 200 km/h |
Manufacturer technical specifications. The power-to-weight ratio is the key physical factor in a drag race.
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 218 hp | Pending |
| Torque | 300 Nm | |
| Weight | 1 989 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Traction | |
| Gearbox | Single-speed |
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 190 hp | Pending |
| Torque | 400 Nm | |
| Weight | 1 817 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | - | |
| Gearbox | 6-speed automatic |
Off the line, the Compass 4xe hits 100 km/h in 7.58 s versus 8.05 s for the Scenic E-Tech Electric 220. At this point, the Compass 4xe leads by 0.47 s and sits roughly 19 m ahead.
At 200 metres, the Compass 4xe is doing 116 km/h against 120 km/h for the Scenic E-Tech Electric 220. The gap is 0.61 s. The gap remains stable from the start.
At 400 metres standing start, the Compass 4xe crosses the line in 15.62 s versus 16.06 s. The 0.44 s gap represents roughly 18 m of track - two to three car lengths.
Past 400 metres, the gap narrows. The Compass 4xe maxes out at 200 km/h while the Scenic E-Tech Electric 220 keeps accelerating towards 233 km/h. At 600 metres, the gap is down to 0.33 s from 0.44 s at 400 metres.
At 1,000 metres, the Compass 4xe finishes in 28.87 s versus 28.98 s, with just 0.11 s to spare. The Scenic E-Tech Electric 220 fails to fully close the launch gap.
Electronically capped at 200 km/h, the Compass 4xe never reaches its natural aerodynamic ceiling in this duel. That’s not a physical limit of the motor - it’s a deliberate manufacturer decision, typically tied to standard-fit tyre ratings or model-range positioning.
With two plug-in hybrid powertrains, the difference comes down to power-to-weight ratio (9.12 kg/hp vs 9.56 kg/hp) and transmission (Automatic vs Automatic).
In European road use (130 km/h max), both vehicles reach the legal speed limit in under 12.66 seconds. The 0.47 s difference in 0 to 100 km/h is mostly felt in motorway merging and overtaking.
Swap one of the two models to explore an equivalent duel in the same segment.
Over 0–100 km/h, Compass 4xe wins (7,58 s vs 8,05 s).
Scenic E-Tech Electric 220 goes from 0 to 100 km/h in 8,05 seconds (calibrated simulation).
Scenic E-Tech Electric 220: 218 hp, ratio 9,12 kg/hp. Compass 4xe: 190 hp, ratio 9,56 kg/hp.
Scenic E-Tech Electric 220: 233 km/h. Compass 4xe: 200 km/h.