Sur 0–100 km/h, EQS 450 V297 gagne (6,30 s vs 6,86 s).
Performance comparison
Simulated drag race 0 → 1,000 m in real time. Synchronised speed counters and stopwatch. Physics calibration on 7 manufacturer measurements.
Simulation
Calibration
Physics model calibrated on manufacturer splits. The limited top speed is not the real aerodynamic top speed of the vehicles.
| EQS 450 V297 | iX3 G08 | |
|---|---|---|
| 0–100 km/h | 6,30 s−0,56 s | 6,86 s |
| 400 m standing start | 14,56 s−0,52 s | 15,08 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 26,38 s−1,16 s | 27,54 s |
| Top speed (electronically limited) | 210 km/h+30 km/h | 180 km/h |
| Power-to-weight ratio | 7,45 kg/hpbetter ratio | 7,64 kg/hp |
Standing-start drag race, calibrated on manufacturer splits. The gap shows at each stage.
Simulated performance at each stage. Winner in green.
| Palier | EQS 450 V297 | iX3 G08 |
|---|---|---|
| 0–30 km/h | 1,62 s | 1,89 s |
| 0–50 km/h | 2,71 s | 3,16 s |
| 0–80 km/h | 4,57 s | 5,13 s |
| 0–100 km/h | 6,30 s | 6,86 s |
| 0–120 km/h | 8,51 s | 9,11 s |
| 0–160 km/h | 15,04 s | 16,42 s |
| 0–200 km/h | 25,02 s | — |
| 400 m standing start | 14,56 s | 15,08 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 26,38 s | 27,54 s |
| Top speed | 210 km/h | 180 km/h |
Manufacturer technical specifications. The power-to-weight ratio is the key physical factor in a drag race.
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 333 hp | Pending |
| Torque | 568 Nm | |
| Weight | 2 480 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | EQS 450 | |
| Gearbox | Single-speed fixed gear |
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 286 hp | Pending |
| Torque | 400 Nm | |
| Weight | 2 185 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | iX3 | |
| Gearbox | Automatic transmission, single-speed with fixed ratio |
Off the line, the EQS 450 hits 100 km/h in 6.30 s versus 6.86 s for the Bmw iX3. At this point, the EQS 450 leads by 0.56 s and sits roughly 10 m ahead.
At 200 metres, the EQS 450 is doing 128 km/h against 126 km/h for the Bmw iX3. The gap is 0.43 s. The challenger starts to claw back ground.
At 400 metres standing start, the EQS 450 crosses the line in 14.56 s versus 15.07 s. The 0.51 s gap represents roughly 22 m of track — two to three car lengths.
Past 400 metres, the EQS 450 continues to build its lead. At 600 metres, it runs at 177 km/h versus 172 km/h. At 1,000 metres, the EQS 450 finishes in 26.37 s versus 27.54 s, with a 1.16 s lead.
Both rivals are electronically governed, but not at the same level: the EQS 450 is capped at 210 km/h, the Bmw iX3 at 180 km/h. This isn’t a physical engine limit — it’s a manufacturer choice, usually for tyre safety or homologation reasons. Neither car reaches its true aerodynamic top speed.
With two electric powertrains, the difference comes down to power-to-weight ratio (7.45 kg/hp vs 7.64 kg/hp) and transmission (Automatic vs Automatic).
In European road use (130 km/h max), both vehicles reach the legal speed limit in under 10.53 seconds. The 0.56 s difference in 0 to 100 km/h is mostly felt in motorway merging and overtaking.
Swap one of the two models to explore an equivalent duel in the same segment.
Sur 0–100 km/h, EQS 450 V297 gagne (6,30 s vs 6,86 s).
EQS 450 V297 passe de 0 à 100 km/h en 6,30 secondes (simulation calibrée).
EQS 450 V297 : 333 hp, ratio 7,45 kg/hp. iX3 G08 : 286 hp, ratio 7,64 kg/hp.
EQS 450 V297 : 210 km/h. iX3 G08 : 180 km/h.