Sur 0–100 km/h, Seal 313 2WD gagne (6,00 s vs 6,30 s).
Performance comparison
Simulated drag race 0 → 1,000 m in real time. Synchronised speed counters and stopwatch. Physics calibration on 7 manufacturer measurements.
Simulation
Calibration
Physics model calibrated on manufacturer splits. The limited top speed is not the real aerodynamic top speed of the vehicles.
| EQS 450 V297 | Seal 313 2WD | |
|---|---|---|
| 0–100 km/h | 6,30 s | 6,00 s+0,30 s |
| 400 m standing start | 14,56 s | 14,21 s+0,35 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 26,38 s | 26,32 s+0,06 s |
| Top speed (electronically limited) | 210 km/h+30 km/h | 180 km/h |
| Power-to-weight ratio | 7,45 kg/hp | 6,35 kg/hpbetter ratio |
Standing-start drag race, calibrated on manufacturer splits. The gap shows at each stage.
Simulated performance at each stage. Winner in green.
| Palier | EQS 450 V297 | Seal 313 2WD |
|---|---|---|
| 0–30 km/h | 1,62 s | 1,74 stight gap |
| 0–50 km/h | 2,71 s | 2,90 s |
| 0–80 km/h | 4,57 s | 4,66 stight gap |
| 0–100 km/h | 6,30 s | 6,00 s |
| 0–120 km/h | 8,51 s | 7,72 s |
| 0–160 km/h | 15,04 s | 13,20 s |
| 0–200 km/h | 25,02 s | — |
| 400 m standing start | 14,56 s | 14,21 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 26,38 s | 26,32 stight gap |
| Top speed | 210 km/h | 180 km/h |
Manufacturer technical specifications. The power-to-weight ratio is the key physical factor in a drag race.
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 333 hp | Pending |
| Torque | 568 Nm | |
| Weight | 2 480 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | EQS 450 | |
| Gearbox | Single-speed fixed gear |
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 313 hp | Pending |
| Torque | 360 Nm | |
| Weight | 1 988 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Seal 313 2WD | |
| Gearbox | single-speed reduction |
Off the line, the Seal 313 2WD hits 100 km/h in 6.00 s versus 6.30 s for the EQS 450. Despite the faster sprint time, the EQS 450 is 3 m further along the track at this moment: stronger low-speed acceleration offsets a slower run beyond 100 km/h.
At 200 metres, the Seal 313 2WD is doing 135 km/h against 128 km/h for the EQS 450. The gap is 0.10 s. The challenger starts to claw back ground.
At 400 metres standing start, the Seal 313 2WD crosses the line in 14.21 s versus 14.56 s. The 0.36 s gap represents roughly 15 m of track — two to three car lengths.
Past 400 metres, the gap narrows. The Seal 313 2WD maxes out at 180 km/h while the EQS 450 keeps accelerating towards 210 km/h. At 600 metres, the gap is down to 0.54 s from 0.36 s at 400 metres.
At 1,000 metres, the Seal 313 2WD finishes in 26.31 s versus 26.37 s, with just 0.06 s to spare. The EQS 450 fails to fully close the launch gap.
Both rivals are electronically governed, but not at the same level: the EQS 450 is capped at 210 km/h, the Seal 313 2WD at 180 km/h. This isn’t a physical engine limit — it’s a manufacturer choice, usually for tyre safety or homologation reasons. Neither car reaches its true aerodynamic top speed.
With two electric powertrains, the difference comes down to power-to-weight ratio (7.45 kg/hp vs 6.35 kg/hp) and transmission (Automatic vs Automatic).
In European road use (130 km/h max), both vehicles reach the legal speed limit in under 9.86 seconds. The 0.30 s difference in 0 to 100 km/h is mostly felt in motorway merging and overtaking.
Swap one of the two models to explore an equivalent duel in the same segment.
Sur 0–100 km/h, Seal 313 2WD gagne (6,00 s vs 6,30 s).
EQS 450 V297 passe de 0 à 100 km/h en 6,30 secondes (simulation calibrée).
EQS 450 V297 : 333 hp, ratio 7,45 kg/hp. Seal 313 2WD : 313 hp, ratio 6,35 kg/hp.
EQS 450 V297 : 210 km/h. Seal 313 2WD : 180 km/h.