Over 0–100 km/h, EQS 450 V297 wins (6,30 s vs 6,58 s).
Simulated drag race 0 → 1,000 m in real time. Synchronised speed counters and stopwatch. Physics calibration on 7 manufacturer measurements.
| Measure | EQS 450 V297 | P7 | Gap |
|---|---|---|---|
| 0–100 km/h | 6.30 s | 6.58 s | 0.28 s · EQS 450 V297 |
| 400 m standing start | 14.56 s | 14.81 s | 0.25 s · EQS 450 V297 |
| 1,000 m standing start | 26.38 s | 27.64 s | 1.26 s · EQS 450 V297 |
| Top speed (electronically limited) | 210 km/h | 170 km/h | 40 km/h · EQS 450 V297 |
| Power-to-weight ratio | 7.45 kg/hp | 7.59 kg/hp | better ratio · EQS 450 V297 |
Standing-start drag race, calibrated on manufacturer splits. The gap shows at each stage.
| Stage | EQS 450 V297 | P7 |
|---|---|---|
| 0–30 km/h | 1.62 s · tight gap | 1.75 s |
| 0–50 km/h | 2.71 s | 2.93 s |
| 0–80 km/h | 4.57 s | 4.84 s |
| 0–100 km/h | 6.30 s | 6.58 s |
| 0–120 km/h | 8.51 s | 8.81 s |
| 0–160 km/h | 15.04 s | 15.66 s |
| 0–200 km/h | 25.02 s | - |
| 400 m standing start | 14.56 s | 14.81 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 26.38 s | 27.64 s |
| Top speed | 210 km/h | 170 km/h |
Physics model calibrated on manufacturer splits. The limited top speed is not the real aerodynamic top speed of the vehicles.
Manufacturer technical specifications. The power-to-weight ratio is the key physical factor in a drag race.
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 333 hp | Pending |
| Torque | 568 Nm | |
| Weight | 2 480 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | - | |
| Gearbox | Single-speed fixed gear |
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 263 hp | Permanent Magnet Synchronous Motor |
| Torque | 390 Nm | |
| Weight | 1 995 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Propulsion | |
| Gearbox | Single-speed fixed gear |
Off the line, the EQS 450 hits 100 km/h in 6.30 s versus 6.58 s for the P7. At this point, the EQS 450 leads by 0.28 s and sits roughly 5 m ahead.
At 200 metres, the EQS 450 is doing 128 km/h against 127 km/h for the P7. The gap is 0.21 s. The gap remains stable from the start.
At 400 metres standing start, the EQS 450 crosses the line in 14.56 s versus 14.81 s. The 0.25 s gap represents roughly 11 m of track - two to three car lengths.
Past 400 metres, the EQS 450 continues to build its lead. At 600 metres, it runs at 177 km/h versus 170 km/h. At 1,000 metres, the EQS 450 finishes in 26.37 s versus 27.64 s, with a 1.27 s lead.
Both rivals are electronically governed, but not at the same level: the EQS 450 is capped at 210 km/h, the P7 at 170 km/h. This isn’t a physical engine limit - it’s a manufacturer choice, usually for tyre safety or homologation reasons. Neither car reaches its true aerodynamic top speed.
With two electric powertrains, the difference comes down to power-to-weight ratio (7.45 kg/hp vs 7.59 kg/hp) and transmission (Automatic vs Automatic).
In European road use (130 km/h max), both vehicles reach the legal speed limit in under 10.18 seconds. The 0.28 s difference in 0 to 100 km/h is mostly felt in motorway merging and overtaking.
Swap one of the two models to explore an equivalent duel in the same segment.
Over 0–100 km/h, EQS 450 V297 wins (6,30 s vs 6,58 s).
EQS 450 V297 goes from 0 to 100 km/h in 6,30 seconds (calibrated simulation).
EQS 450 V297: 333 hp, ratio 7,45 kg/hp. P7: 263 hp, ratio 7,59 kg/hp.
EQS 450 V297: 210 km/h. P7: 170 km/h.