Over 0–100 km/h, V 300 d 4MATIC and E-PACE P200 are neck and neck (8,32 s vs 8,35 s, no significant gap).
Performance comparison
Simulated drag race 0 → 1,000 m in real time. Synchronised speed counters and stopwatch. Physics calibration on 7 manufacturer measurements.
Simulation
Calibration
Physics model calibrated on manufacturer splits. The limited top speed is not the real aerodynamic top speed of the vehicles.
| V 300 d 4MATIC | E-PACE P200 | |
|---|---|---|
| 0–100 km/h | 8,32 s−0,03 s | 8,35 s |
| 400 m standing start | 16,03 s−0,16 s | 16,19 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 29,56 s | 29,41 s+0,15 s |
| Top speed (electronically limited) | 210 km/h | 215 km/h−5 km/h |
| Power-to-weight ratio | 9,44 kg/hp | 8,74 kg/hpbetter ratio |
Standing-start drag race, calibrated on manufacturer splits. The gap shows at each stage.
Simulated performance at each stage. Winner in green.
| Palier | V 300 d 4MATIC | E-PACE P200 |
|---|---|---|
| 0–30 km/h | 1,60 s | 1,98 s |
| 0–50 km/h | 2,77 s | 3,33 s |
| 0–80 km/h | 5,51 s | 5,88 s |
| 0–100 km/h | 8,32 s | 8,35 stight gap |
| 0–120 km/h | 11,54 s | 11,44 stight gap |
| 0–160 km/h | 22,22 s | 21,17 s |
| 0–200 km/h | 51,69 s | 45,14 s |
| 400 m standing start | 16,03 s | 16,19 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 29,56 s | 29,41 stight gap |
| Top speed | 210 km/h | 215 km/h |
Manufacturer technical specifications. The power-to-weight ratio is the key physical factor in a drag race.
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 245 hp | Pending |
| Torque | 500 Nm | |
| Weight | 2 312 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Integrale (AWD) | |
| Gearbox | Unknown |
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 200 hp | Pending |
| Torque | 320 Nm | |
| Weight | 1 748 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | - | |
| Gearbox | 9-speed automatic ZF |
Off the line, the V 300 d 4MATIC hits 100 km/h in 8.32 s versus 8.35 s for the E-PACE P200. The 0.03 s gap is negligible: both vehicles are neck and neck.
At 200 metres, the V 300 d 4MATIC is doing 114 km/h against 115 km/h for the E-PACE P200. The gap is 0.30 s. The gap widens compared to the 0-100.
At 400 metres standing start, the V 300 d 4MATIC crosses the line in 16.03 s versus 16.19 s. The 0.16 s gap represents roughly 6 m of track - barely a car length.
Past 400 metres, the situation changes. The V 300 d 4MATIC maxes out at 210 km/h while the E-PACE P200 keeps accelerating towards 215 km/h. At 600 metres, the gap has dropped to 0.04 s.
Around 679 metres, both vehicles are level. This is the inversion point: the E-PACE P200 overcomes its launch deficit thanks to a 5 km/h higher top speed.
At 1,000 metres, the E-PACE P200 finishes in 29.41 s versus 29.55 s. The 0.14 s delta shows an extremely tight race.
Both rivals share the same electronic speed cap: the V 300 d 4MATIC and the E-PACE P200 are governed to 217 km/h. At that speed, standard-fit tyres approach their safety threshold - an industrial ceiling common to most electric vehicles in this segment. Neither car shows its true aerodynamic potential in this duel.
With two combustion powertrains, the difference comes down to power-to-weight ratio (9.44 kg/hp vs 8.74 kg/hp) and transmission (Unknown vs Automatic).
In European road use (130 km/h max), both vehicles reach the legal speed limit in under 14.08 seconds. The 0.03 s difference in 0 to 100 km/h is mostly felt in motorway merging and overtaking.
Over 0–100 km/h, V 300 d 4MATIC and E-PACE P200 are neck and neck (8,32 s vs 8,35 s, no significant gap).
V 300 d 4MATIC goes from 0 to 100 km/h in 8,32 seconds (calibrated simulation).
V 300 d 4MATIC: 245 hp, ratio 9,44 kg/hp. E-PACE P200: 200 hp, ratio 8,74 kg/hp.
V 300 d 4MATIC: 210 km/h. E-PACE P200: 215 km/h.