Skip to main content
CaralogyCaralogy
HomeBrandsRoad TripBudgetDuelGuides
Caralogy

The car comparison platform. Physics simulation, road trips, real costs.

Navigation
All brandsCar duelRunning costsMotorwayMethodology
Simulators
Motorway simulatorRunning costsPerformance duel
Brands
VolkswagenBMWMercedesToyotaTeslaAudi
FRENDEESIT
© 2026 Caralogy · All rights reserved
  1. Home
  2. /Duel
  3. /SUV
ACayennevsBX3Petrol
  • MotorwayMotorwayRange and charging
  • PerformancePerformance0-100, top speed
  • ConsumptionConsumptionYearly cost
  • SpecsCayenne · X3

Porsche Cayenne Turbo S vs BMW X3 M Competition G01: which is truly faster?

Simulated drag race 0 → 1,000 m in real time. Synchronised speed counters and stopwatch. Physics calibration on 7 manufacturer measurements.

large SUV · 2014 vs 2021 · Methodology
PorschePetrol

Cayenne Turbo S

570 hp · 800 Nm · 2,170 kg · 2014

VS
BMWPetrolFaster

X3 M Competition G01

510 hp · 600 Nm · 1,995 kg · 2021

Result · 0–100 km/h

APorsche Cayenne Turbo S

4.36 s

Gap0.23 sin favour of X3 M Competition
BBMW X3 M Competition G01

4.13 s

Summary · Caralogy simulation
MeasureCayenne Turbo SX3 M Competition G01Gap
0–100 km/h4.36 s4.13 s0.23 s · X3 M Competition G01
400 m standing start12.42 s12.23 s0.19 s · X3 M Competition G01
1,000 m standing start22.42 s22.37 s0.05 s · X3 M Competition G01
Top speed (electronically limited)279 km/h250 km/h29 km/h · Cayenne Turbo S
Power-to-weight ratio3.81 kg/hp3.91 kg/hpbetter ratio · Cayenne Turbo S

Watch the race

Standing-start drag race, calibrated on manufacturer splits. The gap shows at each stage.

PorschePetrolCayenne Turbo S
Speed
0km/h
Timer
0,00s
Distance
0m
BMWPetrolX3 M Competition G01
Speed
0km/h
Timer
0,00s
Distance
0m
100 m
200 m
300 m
400 m
500 m
600 m
700 m
800 m
900 m
1000 m
0m → 1000m
Gap0m

Stage-by-stage comparison

Simulated performance at each stage. Best value in bold.
StageCayenne Turbo SX3 M Competition G01
0–30 km/h1.27 s1.07 s
0–50 km/h2.12 s1.78 s
0–80 km/h3.37 s2.97 s
0–100 km/h4.36 s4.13 s
0–120 km/h5.67 s5.38 s
0–160 km/h9.04 s8.99 s · tight gap
0–200 km/h14.24 s14.51 s
400 m standing start12.42 s12.23 s
1,000 m standing start22.42 s22.37 s · tight gap
Top speed limited279 km/h250 km/h

Parameters and assumptions

Simulation

Start
Standing, straight line
Surface
Dry asphalt, 23°C
Wind
None
Driver
1 person, 75 kg

Calibration

Splits
0–100, 0–200 manufacturer
Power curve
Real measurement (Caralogy)
VMax
Manufacturer limited
Transmission
Losses integrated in model

Physics model calibrated on manufacturer splits. The limited top speed is not the real aerodynamic top speed of the vehicles.

Under the bonnet

Manufacturer technical specifications. The power-to-weight ratio is the key physical factor in a drag race.

Porsche

Cayenne Turbo S

3,81kg/hpratio better by 0,10 kg/hp
CharacteristicValueDetail
Power570 hpEngine block and cylinder heads formed in aluminum
Torque800 Nm
Weight2 170 kgmanufacturer kerb weight
DrivetrainIntegrale (AWD)
Gearbox8-speed Tiptronic S; all-wheel drive with electronically controlled, map-based multiple-plate clutch with Auto Start Stop function
BMW

X3 M Competition G01

3,91kg/hpcompensated by −175 kg
CharacteristicValueDetail
Power510 hp6 cyl
Torque600 Nm
Weight1 995 kgmanufacturer kerb weight
DrivetrainIntegrale (AWD)
GearboxEight-speed M Steptronic transmission with Drivelogic

The start: 0 to 100 km/h

Off the line, the X3 M Competition hits 100 km/h in 4.13 s versus 4.36 s for the Cayenne Turbo S. At this point, the X3 M Competition leads by 0.23 s and sits roughly 7 m ahead.

From 100 km/h to 400 metres

At 200 metres, the X3 M Competition is doing 151 km/h against 152 km/h for the Cayenne Turbo S. The gap is 0.25 s. The gap remains stable from the start.

At 400 metres standing start, the X3 M Competition crosses the line in 12.22 s versus 12.42 s. The 0.19 s gap represents roughly 10 m of track - two to three car lengths.

Beyond 400 metres: top speed comes into play

Past 400 metres, the gap narrows. The X3 M Competition maxes out at 250 (i.e. 155 mph - industry threshold) km/h while the Cayenne Turbo S keeps accelerating towards 279 km/h. At 600 metres, the gap has dropped to 0.15 s.

At 1,000 metres, the X3 M Competition finishes in 22.37 s versus 22.41 s, with just 0.05 s to spare. The Cayenne Turbo S fails to fully close the launch gap.

What the numbers don’t tell you

Both rivals are electronically governed, but not at the same level: the Cayenne Turbo S is capped at 282 km/h, the X3 M Competition at 250 (i.e. 155 mph - industry threshold) km/h. This isn’t a physical engine limit - it’s a manufacturer choice, usually for tyre safety or homologation reasons. Neither car reaches its true aerodynamic top speed.

With two combustion powertrains, the difference comes down to power-to-weight ratio (3.81 kg/hp vs 3.91 kg/hp) and transmission (Automatic vs Automatic).

In European road use (130 km/h max), both vehicles reach the legal speed limit in under 6.36 seconds. The 0.23 s difference in 0 to 100 km/h is mostly felt in motorway merging and overtaking.

Compare with other alternatives

Swap one of the two models to explore an equivalent duel in the same segment.

Instead of Cayenne Turbo S
Jaguar F-PACE SVRAlfa Romeo Stelvio QuadrifoglioPorsche Macan Turbo
Instead of X3 M Competition G01
BMW X5 M CompetitionBMW X5 M50iBMW X5 M50i

Other duels you might be interested in

AudiVSPorsche

RS Q8 SUV vs Cayenne Turbo S

JaguarVSBMW

F-PACE SVR vs X3 M Competition

PorscheVSBMW

Cayenne Turbo S vs X5 M50i

BMWVSPorsche

X3 M Competition vs Macan Turbo with Performance Package

Frequently asked questions

Over 0–100 km/h, X3 M Competition G01 wins (4,13 s vs 4,36 s).

Cayenne Turbo S goes from 0 to 100 km/h in 4,36 seconds (calibrated simulation).

Cayenne Turbo S: 570 hp, ratio 3,81 kg/hp. X3 M Competition G01: 510 hp, ratio 3,91 kg/hp.

Cayenne Turbo S: 279 km/h. X3 M Competition G01: 250 km/h.