G01 · GENERATION 2021 · FAMILY SUV
BMWICE

X3 M Competition

510 hp, 4,1 s 0-100 : among the 13 D-SUV 2019–2023, the X3 M Competition ranks 1st of 13 in 0–100 km/h, 5th of 13 in Top speed, 2nd of 13 in Power-to-weight. Here is what the Caralogy simulations say.

Energy cost · estimate2,83815,000 km · UK mix · home UK £/kWhCustomise →

Power

510hp

600 Nm

0 → 100 km/h

4.1s

VMax 250 km/h

Cons.

11.0L

/100 km

Tank

65L

Sur cette page

Technical identity card

Full specifications BMW X3 M Competition

Manufacturer data and values calibrated by the Caralogy simulation engine.

Powertrain

ArchitectureUnknown · 6 cyl.
Displacement2,993 cm\u00b3
Power510 hp
Couple600 Nm
GearboxTorque Converter 8 rapports Automatic
TransmissionAWD

Consumption

Cons. WLTP11,0 L/100km
Tank65 L

Performance

0 → 100 km/h4,1 s
VMax250 km/h

Dimensions and environment

Length4,726 mm
Wheelbase2,864 mm
Width1,897 mm
Height1,669 mm
Boot550 L
Kerb weight1,995 kg
Cd0.36
CO₂ WLTP253 g/km

Caralogy Methodology

Motorway and performance values calibrated by the Caralogy physics simulation engine (SCx, Crr, real torque curves).

See full methodology →

Manufacturer data · motorway values calibrated by the Caralogy engine

Among the 13 D-SUV, the X3 M Competition ranks (best in segment) in acceleration. Caralogy simulates its real-world performance: motorway simulation, performance simulation and consumption simulation.

Caralogy Analysis · tailored to this vehicle

Caralogy Verdict

Suitable for

Demanding drivers: 1st of 13 in 0–100 km/h (4.1 s), 5th of 13 in Top speed (250 km/h), 2nd of 13 in Power-to-weight (256 hp/t). 1st of 13 in 0–100 km/h (4.1 s), 5th of 13 in Top speed (250 km/h), 2nd of 13 in Power-to-weight (256 hp/t).

Less suitable for

Frequent urban trips with stop-and-go. At 11,0 L/100 km on the combined cycle, consumption rises in the city without electric assistance. An HEV or PHEV would be more economical for this use profile.

Alternatives to consider

If the priority is Top speed, the Jaguar F-PACE SVR (1st with 285 km/h) takes the lead. If the priority is Power-to-weight, the Jaguar F-PACE SVR (1st with 272 hp/t) takes the lead.

Acceleration: 4.1 s 0-100 (1st of 13 in 0–100 km/h)

In pure acceleration, the X3 M Competition ranks 1st of 13 in 0–100 km/h, 0.0 s off the reference Bmw X3 M Competition (4.1 s).

Top speed: 250 km/h (5th of 13 in Top speed)

Top speed of 250 km/h. The segment reference reaches 285 km/h.

Segment positioning

Where the X3 M Competition stands against D-SUV

Comparison across 13 D-SUV marketed between 2019–2023.

0–100 km/h

1eout of 13

4,1 s
Min5,7 s · Renault Rafale E-Tech Full Hybrid 4x4 300
Max4,1 s · Bmw X3 M Competition

Top speed

5eout of 13

250 km/h
Min200 km/h · Renault Rafale E-Tech Full Hybrid 4x4 300
Max285 km/h · Jaguar F-PACE SVR

Power-to-weight

2eout of 13

256 hp/t
Min157 hp/t · Renault Rafale E-Tech Full Hybrid 4x4 300
Max272 hp/t · Jaguar F-PACE SVR

Direct rivals (same segment, same energy)

Cross-energy alternatives

Same needs, different powertrain.

Model family

The full BMW X3 G01 range

Generation G01 launched in 2018. Available versions sorted by energy.

Other versions of the G01

Compare

Popular duels involving the X3 M Competition

Take the next step

Find a X3 M Competition or value yours

Caralogy receives no commission on these external links.

Frequently asked questions

BMW X3 M Competition: what you need to know

Well-argued answers to the most asked questions about this model, based on Caralogy data and simulations.

Where does the X3 M Competition rank in its segment?#

Among the 13 D-SUV 2019–2023, the X3 M Competition ranks 1st of 13 in 0–100 km/h (4.1 s, behind the Bmw X3 M Competition), 5th of 13 in Top speed (250 km/h, behind the Jaguar F-PACE SVR), 2nd of 13 in Power-to-weight (256 hp/t, behind the Jaguar F-PACE SVR).

How much does the X3 M Competition cost to run?#

Running costs depend on your profile (mileage, charging type, city/highway mix). Use the Caralogy consumption simulator for a personalised estimate.

How does Caralogy calculate its figures?#

Caralogy does not reproduce manufacturer figures: we recalculate every number through physics simulation, starting from SCx, mass and the power curve. This is why our figures at 130 km/h differ from WLTP. Full methodology on the dedicated page.