Over 0–100 km/h, Megane 3 RS 265 wins (6,08 s vs 7,46 s).
Simulated drag race 0 → 1,000 m in real time. Synchronised speed counters and stopwatch. Physics calibration on 7 manufacturer measurements.
| Measure | Megane 3 RS 265 | 320e G20 | Gap |
|---|---|---|---|
| 0–100 km/h | 6.08 s | 7.46 s | 1.38 s · Megane 3 RS 265 |
| 400 m standing start | 14.03 s | 15.44 s | 1.41 s · Megane 3 RS 265 |
| 1,000 m standing start | 24.97 s | 28.77 s | 3.80 s · Megane 3 RS 265 |
| Top speed (electronically limited) | 250 km/h | 215 km/h | 35 km/h · Megane 3 RS 265 |
| Power-to-weight ratio | 5.19 kg/hp | 8.65 kg/hp | better ratio · Megane 3 RS 265 |
Standing-start drag race, calibrated on manufacturer splits. The gap shows at each stage.
| Stage | Megane 3 RS 265 | 320e G20 |
|---|---|---|
| 0–30 km/h | 1.64 s | 1.31 s |
| 0–50 km/h | 2.74 s | 2.37 s |
| 0–80 km/h | 4.58 s | 4.96 s |
| 0–100 km/h | 6.08 s | 7.46 s |
| 0–120 km/h | 7.69 s | 10.74 s |
| 0–160 km/h | 12.40 s | 20.97 s |
| 0–200 km/h | 19.91 s | 46.63 s |
| 400 m standing start | 14.03 s | 15.44 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 24.97 s | 28.77 s |
| Top speed limited | 250 km/h | 215 km/h |
Physics model calibrated on manufacturer splits. The limited top speed is not the real aerodynamic top speed of the vehicles.
Manufacturer technical specifications. The power-to-weight ratio is the key physical factor in a drag race.
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 265 hp | Pending |
| Torque | 360 Nm | |
| Weight | 1 376 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Traction | |
| Gearbox | 6-speed manual |
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 204 hp | Pending |
| Torque | 350 Nm | |
| Weight | 1 765 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | - | |
| Gearbox | 8-speed Steptronic |
Off the line, the Megane 3 RS 265 hits 100 km/h in 6.08 s versus 7.46 s for the 320e. Despite lacking instant torque, 265 hp of power compensates. Despite the faster sprint time, the 320e is 1 m further along the track at this moment: stronger low-speed acceleration offsets a slower run beyond 100 km/h.
At 200 metres, the Megane 3 RS 265 is doing 137 km/h against 115 km/h for the 320e. The gap is 0.49 s. The challenger starts to claw back ground.
At 400 metres standing start, the Megane 3 RS 265 crosses the line in 14.03 s versus 15.43 s. The 1.41 s gap represents roughly 54 m of track - a gap visible to the naked eye.
Past 400 metres, the Megane 3 RS 265 continues to build its lead. At 600 metres, it runs at 193 km/h versus 158 km/h. At 1,000 metres, the Megane 3 RS 265 finishes in 24.97 s versus 28.77 s, with a 3.80 s lead.
Both rivals are electronically governed, but not at the same level: the Megane 3 RS 265 is capped at 250 (i.e. 155 mph - industry threshold) km/h, the 320e at 220 km/h. This isn’t a physical engine limit - it’s a manufacturer choice, usually for tyre safety or homologation reasons. Neither car reaches its true aerodynamic top speed.
Instant electric torque gives an advantage off the line. The higher top speed of the combustion engine gives an advantage over longer distances. The distance at which one catches the other depends on the top speed differential.
In European road use (130 km/h max), both vehicles reach the legal speed limit in under 12.74 seconds. The 1.38 s difference in 0 to 100 km/h is mostly felt in motorway merging and overtaking.
Over 0–100 km/h, Megane 3 RS 265 wins (6,08 s vs 7,46 s).
Megane 3 RS 265 goes from 0 to 100 km/h in 6,08 seconds (calibrated simulation).
Megane 3 RS 265: 265 hp, ratio 5,19 kg/hp. 320e G20: 204 hp, ratio 8,65 kg/hp.
Megane 3 RS 265: 250 km/h. 320e G20: 215 km/h.