Over 0–100 km/h, 320d G20 wins (7,03 s vs 7,42 s).
Performance comparison
Simulated drag race 0 → 1,000 m in real time. Synchronised speed counters and stopwatch. Physics calibration on 7 manufacturer measurements.
Simulation
Calibration
Physics model calibrated on manufacturer splits. The limited top speed is not the real aerodynamic top speed of the vehicles.
| Octavia iV 1.4 TSI e-TEC PHEV 245 | 320d G20 | |
|---|---|---|
| 0–100 km/h | 7,42 s | 7,03 s+0,39 s |
| 400 m standing start | 15,48 s | 15,13 s+0,35 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 27,65 s | 27,24 s+0,41 s |
| Top speed (electronically limited) | 230 km/h | 240 km/h−10 km/h |
| Power-to-weight ratio | 6,98 kg/hpbetter ratio | 7,63 kg/hp |
Standing-start drag race, calibrated on manufacturer splits. The gap shows at each stage.
Simulated performance at each stage. Winner in green.
| Palier | Octavia iV 1.4 TSI e-TEC PHEV 245 | 320d G20 |
|---|---|---|
| 0–30 km/h | 2,08 s | 1,81 s |
| 0–50 km/h | 3,46 s | 3,00 s |
| 0–80 km/h | 5,66 s | 5,11 s |
| 0–100 km/h | 7,42 s | 7,03 s |
| 0–120 km/h | 9,79 s | 9,49 s |
| 0–160 km/h | 16,52 s | 16,32 s |
| 0–200 km/h | 30,13 s | 28,13 s |
| 400 m standing start | 15,48 s | 15,13 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 27,65 s | 27,24 s |
| Top speed | 230 km/h | 240 km/h |
Manufacturer technical specifications. The power-to-weight ratio is the key physical factor in a drag race.
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 245 hp | 4 cyl |
| Torque | 400 Nm | |
| Weight | 1 710 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | - | |
| Gearbox | 6-speed DSG PHEV (DQ400e) |
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 190 hp | Pending |
| Torque | 400 Nm | |
| Weight | 1 450 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | - | |
| Gearbox | Six-speed manual |
Off the line, the 320d hits 100 km/h in 7.03 s versus 7.42 s for the Octavia iV 1.4 TSI e-TEC PHEV 245. Despite lacking instant torque, 190 hp of power compensates. At this point, the 320d leads by 0.39 s and sits roughly 11 m ahead.
At 200 metres, the 320d is doing 123 km/h against 124 km/h for the Octavia iV 1.4 TSI e-TEC PHEV 245. The gap is 0.39 s. The gap remains stable from the start.
At 400 metres standing start, the 320d crosses the line in 15.13 s versus 15.47 s. The 0.35 s gap represents roughly 15 m of track - two to three car lengths.
Past 400 metres, the 320d continues to build its lead. At 600 metres, it runs at 173 km/h versus 173 km/h. At 1,000 metres, the 320d finishes in 27.23 s versus 27.64 s, with a 0.41 s lead. Both vehicles have similar top speeds (230 vs 240 km/h), preventing any comeback.
Electronically capped at 240 km/h, the 320d never reaches its natural aerodynamic ceiling in this duel. That’s not a physical limit of the motor - it’s a deliberate manufacturer decision, typically tied to standard-fit tyre ratings or model-range positioning.
Instant electric torque gives an advantage off the line. The higher top speed of the combustion engine gives an advantage over longer distances. The distance at which one catches the other depends on the top speed differential.
In European road use (130 km/h max), both vehicles reach the legal speed limit in under 11.15 seconds. The 0.39 s difference in 0 to 100 km/h is mostly felt in motorway merging and overtaking.
Over 0–100 km/h, 320d G20 wins (7,03 s vs 7,42 s).
Octavia iV 1.4 TSI e-TEC PHEV 245 goes from 0 to 100 km/h in 7,42 seconds (calibrated simulation).
Octavia iV 1.4 TSI e-TEC PHEV 245: 245 hp, ratio 6,98 kg/hp. 320d G20: 190 hp, ratio 7,63 kg/hp.
Octavia iV 1.4 TSI e-TEC PHEV 245: 230 km/h. 320d G20: 240 km/h.