Over 0–100 km/h, Model 3 Performance wins (3,04 s vs 4,33 s).
Performance comparison
Simulated drag race 0 → 1,000 m in real time. Synchronised speed counters and stopwatch. Physics calibration on 7 manufacturer measurements.
Simulation
Calibration
Physics model calibrated on manufacturer splits. The limited top speed is not the real aerodynamic top speed of the vehicles.
| Model 3 Performance | GLC 400 4MATIC with EQ Technology X254 | |
|---|---|---|
| 0–100 km/h | 3,04 s−1,29 s | 4,33 s |
| 400 m standing start | 11,13 s−1,53 s | 12,66 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 20,49 s−2,86 s | 23,35 s |
| Top speed (electronically limited) | 261 km/h+51 km/h | 210 km/h |
| Power-to-weight ratio | 3,62 kg/hpbetter ratio | 5,18 kg/hp |
Standing-start drag race, calibrated on manufacturer splits. The gap shows at each stage.
Simulated performance at each stage. Winner in green.
| Palier | Model 3 Performance | GLC 400 4MATIC with EQ Technology X254 |
|---|---|---|
| 0–30 km/h | 0,82 s | 1,17 s |
| 0–50 km/h | 1,37 s | 1,94 s |
| 0–80 km/h | 2,26 s | 3,21 s |
| 0–100 km/h | 3,04 s | 4,33 s |
| 0–120 km/h | 4,03 s | 5,77 s |
| 0–160 km/h | 6,97 s | 10,06 s |
| 0–200 km/h | 11,20 s | 16,35 s |
| 400 m standing start | 11,13 s | 12,66 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 20,49 s | 23,35 s |
| Top speed | 261 km/h | 210 km/h |
Manufacturer technical specifications. The power-to-weight ratio is the key physical factor in a drag race.
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 510 hp | Dual Permanent Magnet Synchronous Motor |
| Torque | 769 Nm | |
| Weight | 1 844 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Integrale (AWD) | |
| Gearbox | Single-speed fixed gear |
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 489 hp | Pending |
| Torque | 800 Nm | |
| Weight | 2 535 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Integrale (AWD) | |
| Gearbox | Unknown |
Off the line, the Model 3 Performance hits 100 km/h in 3.04 s versus 4.34 s for the GLC 400 4MATIC with EQ Technology. At this point, the Model 3 Performance leads by 1.30 s and sits roughly 12 m ahead.
At 200 metres, the Model 3 Performance is doing 162 km/h against 145 km/h for the GLC 400 4MATIC with EQ Technology. The gap is 1.07 s. The challenger starts to claw back ground.
At 400 metres standing start, the Model 3 Performance crosses the line in 11.12 s versus 12.66 s. The 1.53 s gap represents roughly 74 m of track - a gap visible to the naked eye.
Past 400 metres, the Model 3 Performance continues to build its lead. At 600 metres, it runs at 224 km/h versus 201 km/h. At 1,000 metres, the Model 3 Performance finishes in 20.48 s versus 23.35 s, with a 2.86 s lead.
Both rivals are electronically governed, but not at the same level: the Model 3 Performance is capped at 261 km/h, the GLC 400 4MATIC with EQ Technology at 210 km/h. This isn’t a physical engine limit - it’s a manufacturer choice, usually for tyre safety or homologation reasons. Neither car reaches its true aerodynamic top speed.
With two electric powertrains, the difference comes down to power-to-weight ratio (3.62 kg/hp vs 5.18 kg/hp) and transmission (Automatic vs Unknown).
In European road use (130 km/h max), both vehicles reach the legal speed limit in under 6.65 seconds. The 1.30 s difference in 0 to 100 km/h is mostly felt in motorway merging and overtaking.
Over 0–100 km/h, Model 3 Performance wins (3,04 s vs 4,33 s).
Model 3 Performance goes from 0 to 100 km/h in 3,04 seconds (calibrated simulation).
Model 3 Performance: 510 hp, ratio 3,62 kg/hp. GLC 400 4MATIC with EQ Technology X254: 489 hp, ratio 5,18 kg/hp.
Model 3 Performance: 261 km/h. GLC 400 4MATIC with EQ Technology X254: 210 km/h.