Over 0–100 km/h, XC40 B4 and 318i G20 are neck and neck (8,23 s vs 8,33 s, no significant gap).
Performance comparison
Simulated drag race 0 → 1,000 m in real time. Synchronised speed counters and stopwatch. Physics calibration on 7 manufacturer measurements.
Simulation
Calibration
Physics model calibrated on manufacturer splits. The limited top speed is not the real aerodynamic top speed of the vehicles.
| XC40 B4 | 318i G20 | |
|---|---|---|
| 0–100 km/h | 8,23 s−0,10 s | 8,33 s |
| 400 m standing start | 16,11 s | 16,07 s+0,04 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 29,39 s−0,05 s | 29,44 s |
| Top speed (electronically limited) | 180 km/h | 223 km/h−43 km/h |
| Power-to-weight ratio | 8,17 kg/hpbetter ratio | 9,55 kg/hp |
Standing-start drag race, calibrated on manufacturer splits. The gap shows at each stage.
Simulated performance at each stage. Winner in green.
| Palier | XC40 B4 | 318i G20 |
|---|---|---|
| 0–30 km/h | 1,98 s | 1,65 s |
| 0–50 km/h | 3,12 s | 2,89 s |
| 0–80 km/h | 5,74 s | 5,71 stight gap |
| 0–100 km/h | 8,23 s | 8,33 stight gap |
| 0–120 km/h | 11,35 s | 11,68 s |
| 0–160 km/h | 21,46 s | 21,84 s |
| 0–200 km/h | - | 43,57 s |
| 400 m standing start | 16,11 s | 16,07 stight gap |
| 1,000 m standing start | 29,39 s | 29,44 stight gap |
| Top speed | 180 km/h | 223 km/h |
Manufacturer technical specifications. The power-to-weight ratio is the key physical factor in a drag race.
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 197 hp | Pending |
| Torque | 300 Nm | |
| Weight | 1 610 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Traction | |
| Gearbox | 8-speed Geartronic |
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 156 hp | 4 cyl |
| Torque | 250 Nm | |
| Weight | 1 490 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | - | |
| Gearbox | Eight-speed Steptronic transmission |
Off the line, the XC40 B4 hits 100 km/h in 8.23 s versus 8.33 s for the Bmw 318i. The 0.10 s gap is negligible: both vehicles are neck and neck.
At 200 metres, the Bmw 318i is doing 113 km/h against 115 km/h for the XC40 B4. The gap is 0.13 s. The gap remains stable from the start.
At 400 metres standing start, the Bmw 318i crosses the line in 16.06 s versus 16.10 s. The 0.04 s gap represents roughly 2 m of track
Past 400 metres, the situation changes. The XC40 B4 maxes out at 180 km/h while the Bmw 318i keeps accelerating towards 223 km/h. At 600 metres, the gap has dropped to 0.01 s.
Around 526 metres, both vehicles are level. This is the inversion point: the XC40 B4 overcomes its launch deficit thanks to a 43 km/h higher top speed.
At 1,000 metres, the XC40 B4 finishes in 29.39 s versus 29.44 s. The 0.05 s delta shows an extremely tight race.
Both rivals are electronically governed, but not at the same level: the XC40 B4 is capped at 180 km/h, the Bmw 318i at 223 km/h. This isn’t a physical engine limit - it’s a manufacturer choice, usually for tyre safety or homologation reasons. Neither car reaches its true aerodynamic top speed.
With two combustion powertrains, the difference comes down to power-to-weight ratio (8.17 kg/hp vs 9.55 kg/hp) and transmission (Automatic vs Automatic).
In European road use (130 km/h max), both vehicles reach the legal speed limit in under 13.71 seconds. The 0.10 s difference in 0 to 100 km/h is mostly felt in motorway merging and overtaking.
Swap one of the two models to explore an equivalent duel in the same segment.
Over 0–100 km/h, XC40 B4 and 318i G20 are neck and neck (8,23 s vs 8,33 s, no significant gap).
XC40 B4 goes from 0 to 100 km/h in 8,23 seconds (calibrated simulation).
XC40 B4: 197 hp, ratio 8,17 kg/hp. 318i G20: 156 hp, ratio 9,55 kg/hp.
XC40 B4: 180 km/h. 318i G20: 223 km/h.