Over 0–100 km/h, DS7 E-Tense 4x4 300 wins (5,98 s vs 8,51 s).
Performance comparison
Simulated drag race 0 → 1,000 m in real time. Synchronised speed counters and stopwatch. Physics calibration on 7 manufacturer measurements.
Simulation
Calibration
Physics model calibrated on manufacturer splits. The limited top speed is not the real aerodynamic top speed of the vehicles.
| G9 | DS7 E-Tense 4x4 300 | |
|---|---|---|
| 0–100 km/h | 8,51 s | 5,98 s+2,53 s |
| 400 m standing start | 16,32 s | 14,27 s+2,05 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 28,71 s | 26,41 s+2,30 s |
| Top speed (electronically limited) | 200 km/h | 230 km/h−30 km/h |
| Power-to-weight ratio | 7,18 kg/hp | 6,23 kg/hpbetter ratio |
Standing-start drag race, calibrated on manufacturer splits. The gap shows at each stage.
Simulated performance at each stage. Winner in green.
| Palier | G9 | DS7 E-Tense 4x4 300 |
|---|---|---|
| 0–30 km/h | 2,41 s | 1,31 s |
| 0–50 km/h | 4,03 s | 2,11 s |
| 0–80 km/h | 6,49 s | 4,09 s |
| 0–100 km/h | 8,51 s | 5,98 s |
| 0–120 km/h | 11,09 s | 8,25 s |
| 0–160 km/h | 18,51 s | 15,16 s |
| 0–200 km/h | 31,05 s | 28,87 s |
| 400 m standing start | 16,32 s | 14,27 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 28,71 s | 26,41 s |
| Top speed | 200 km/h | 230 km/h |
Manufacturer technical specifications. The power-to-weight ratio is the key physical factor in a drag race.
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 308 hp | Permanent Magnet Synchronous Motor |
| Torque | 430 Nm | |
| Weight | 2 210 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Propulsion | |
| Gearbox | Single-speed fixed gear |
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 305 hp | Pending |
| Torque | 500 Nm | |
| Weight | 1 900 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Integrale (4WD) | |
| Gearbox | 8-speed automatic |
Off the line, the DS7 E-Tense 4x4 300 hits 100 km/h in 5.98 s versus 8.51 s for the G9. At this point, the DS7 E-Tense 4x4 300 leads by 2.53 s and sits roughly 36 m ahead.
At 200 metres, the DS7 E-Tense 4x4 300 is doing 127 km/h against 120 km/h for the G9. The gap is 1.81 s. The challenger starts to claw back ground.
At 400 metres standing start, the DS7 E-Tense 4x4 300 crosses the line in 14.27 s versus 16.32 s. The 2.05 s gap represents roughly 82 m of track - a gap visible to the naked eye.
Past 400 metres, the DS7 E-Tense 4x4 300 continues to build its lead. At 600 metres, it runs at 174 km/h versus 169 km/h. At 1,000 metres, the DS7 E-Tense 4x4 300 finishes in 26.41 s versus 28.71 s, with a 2.30 s lead.
Electronically capped at 200 km/h, the G9 never reaches its natural aerodynamic ceiling in this duel. That’s not a physical limit of the motor - it’s a deliberate manufacturer decision, typically tied to standard-fit tyre ratings or model-range positioning.
With two plug-in hybrid powertrains, the difference comes down to power-to-weight ratio (7.18 kg/hp vs 6.23 kg/hp) and transmission (Automatic vs Automatic).
In European road use (130 km/h max), both vehicles reach the legal speed limit in under 12.63 seconds. The 2.53 s difference in 0 to 100 km/h is mostly felt in motorway merging and overtaking.
Swap one of the two models to explore an equivalent duel in the same segment.
Over 0–100 km/h, DS7 E-Tense 4x4 300 wins (5,98 s vs 8,51 s).
G9 goes from 0 to 100 km/h in 8,51 seconds (calibrated simulation).
G9: 308 hp, ratio 7,18 kg/hp. DS7 E-Tense 4x4 300: 305 hp, ratio 6,23 kg/hp.
G9: 200 km/h. DS7 E-Tense 4x4 300: 230 km/h.