Over 0–100 km/h, P7 wins (4,21 s vs 4,92 s).
Simulated drag race 0 → 1,000 m in real time. Synchronised speed counters and stopwatch. Physics calibration on 7 manufacturer measurements.
| Measure | P7 | EX40 Twin Motor AWD | Gap |
|---|---|---|---|
| 0–100 km/h | 4.21 s | 4.92 s | 0.71 s · P7 |
| 400 m standing start | 12.55 s | 13.15 s | 0.60 s · P7 |
| 1,000 m standing start | 25.25 s | 25.14 s | 0.11 s · EX40 Twin Motor AWD |
| Top speed (electronically limited) | 170 km/h | 180 km/h | 10 km/h · EX40 Twin Motor AWD |
| Power-to-weight ratio | 4.81 kg/hp | 5.17 kg/hp | better ratio · P7 |
Standing-start drag race, calibrated on manufacturer splits. The gap shows at each stage.
| Stage | P7 | EX40 Twin Motor AWD |
|---|---|---|
| 0–30 km/h | 1.11 s | 1.60 s |
| 0–50 km/h | 1.85 s | 2.47 s |
| 0–80 km/h | 3.09 s | 3.74 s |
| 0–100 km/h | 4.21 s | 4.92 s |
| 0–120 km/h | 5.64 s | 6.42 s |
| 0–160 km/h | 9.67 s | 10.52 s |
| 400 m standing start | 12.55 s | 13.15 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 25.25 s | 25.14 s · tight gap |
| Top speed | 170 km/h | 180 km/h |
Physics model calibrated on manufacturer splits. The limited top speed is not the real aerodynamic top speed of the vehicles.
Manufacturer technical specifications. The power-to-weight ratio is the key physical factor in a drag race.
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 424 hp | Dual Permanent Magnet Synchronous Motor |
| Torque | 655 Nm | |
| Weight | 2 040 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Integrale (AWD) | |
| Gearbox | Single-speed fixed gear |
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 408 hp | Pending |
| Torque | 670 Nm | |
| Weight | 2 110 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Integrale (AWD) | |
| Gearbox | single-speed reduction AWD |
Off the line, the P7 hits 100 km/h in 4.22 s versus 4.93 s for the EX40 Twin Motor AWD. At this point, the P7 leads by 0.71 s and sits roughly 13 m ahead.
At 200 metres, the P7 is doing 147 km/h against 144 km/h for the EX40 Twin Motor AWD. The gap is 0.60 s. The challenger starts to claw back ground.
At 400 metres standing start, the P7 crosses the line in 12.54 s versus 13.14 s. The 0.60 s gap represents roughly 30 m of track - two to three car lengths.
Past 400 metres, the situation changes. The P7 maxes out at 170 km/h while the EX40 Twin Motor AWD keeps accelerating towards 180 km/h. At 600 metres, the gap has dropped to 0.36 s.
Around 910 metres, both vehicles are level. This is the inversion point: the EX40 Twin Motor AWD overcomes its launch deficit thanks to a 10 km/h higher top speed.
At 1,000 metres, the EX40 Twin Motor AWD finishes in 25.14 s versus 25.24 s. The 0.10 s delta shows an extremely tight race.
Both rivals are electronically governed, but not at the same level: the P7 is capped at 170 km/h, the EX40 Twin Motor AWD at 180 km/h. This isn’t a physical engine limit - it’s a manufacturer choice, usually for tyre safety or homologation reasons. Neither car reaches its true aerodynamic top speed.
With two electric powertrains, the difference comes down to power-to-weight ratio (4.81 kg/hp vs 5.17 kg/hp) and transmission (Automatic vs Automatic).
In European road use (130 km/h max), both vehicles reach the legal speed limit in under 7.30 seconds. The 0.71 s difference in 0 to 100 km/h is mostly felt in motorway merging and overtaking.
Over 0–100 km/h, P7 wins (4,21 s vs 4,92 s).
P7 goes from 0 to 100 km/h in 4,21 seconds (calibrated simulation).
P7: 424 hp, ratio 4,81 kg/hp. EX40 Twin Motor AWD: 408 hp, ratio 5,17 kg/hp.
P7: 170 km/h. EX40 Twin Motor AWD: 180 km/h.