Skip to main content
CaralogyCaralogy
HomeBrandsRoad TripBudgetDuelGuides
Caralogy

The car comparison platform. Physics simulation, road trips, real costs.

Navigation
All brandsCar duelRunning costsMotorwayMethodology
Simulators
Motorway simulatorRunning costsPerformance duel
Brands
VolkswagenBMWMercedesToyotaTeslaAudi
FRENDEESIT
© 2026 Caralogy · All rights reserved
  1. Home
  2. /Motorway
  3. /saloon
ASealvsBModel 3BEV
  • MotorwayMotorwayRange and charging
  • PerformancePerformance0-100, top speed
  • ConsumptionConsumptionYearly cost
  • SpecsSeal · Model 3

BYD Seal 390 AWD vs Tesla Model 3 Performance

Trip mapped at a glance. Charging stops visible, total duration predictable. Caralogy simulation at 130 km/h.

saloon · 2022 vs 2021 · Paris → Marseille · 775 km · 130 km/h
BYDBEV

Seal 390 AWD

530 ch · 80 kWh · 2022

VS
TeslaBEVPlus rapide

Model 3 Performance

456 ch · 78 kWh · 2021

Simulation trip
Assumptions: 130 km/h · start 100 % · mild weather

Result · total trip time

ABYD Seal 390 AWD

7h45charging included

3 stops · 61.42 €

Gap21 minin favour of Model 3 Performance
BTesla Model 3 Performance

7h24charging included

3 stops · 64.65 €

Paris → Marseille · 130 km/h · Caralogy simulation
MeasureSeal 390 AWDModel 3 PerformanceGap
Total time7h457h2421 min · Model 3 Performance
Charging stops3 stops3 stopsSame
Cost of energy used61.42 €64.65 €3.23 € · Seal 390 AWD

Visualise the trip

Both vehicles drive at 130 km/h. The difference comes from charging stops.

BYDBEV
Seal 390 AWD
100%
412 km
Range
Paris
0 km · departure
Charge 1
17 min · +32 kWh · 19.20 €
Charge 2
17 min · +32 kWh · 19.20 €
Charge 3
11 min · +20 kWh · 12.10 €
Marseille
775 km · Arrival 7h45
3
Stops
7h45
Duration
61.42 €
Cost of energy used
TeslaBEVFastest
Model 3 Performance
100%
391 km
Range
Paris
0 km · departure
Charge 1
8 min · +31 kWh · 18.72 €
Charge 2
8 min · +31 kWh · 18.72 €
Charge 3
7 min · +28 kWh · 16.75 €
Marseille
775 km · Arrival 7h24
3
Stops
7h24
Duration
64.65 €
Cost of energy used

The 21-minute lead of the Model 3 Performance does not come from driving speed, but from shorter stops on this route (23 min vs 44 min).

Both vehicles drove at 130 km/h for the entire trip. The gap is built at the stops: 3 stops totalling 23 min for the Model 3 Performance versus 3 stops totalling 44 min for the Seal 390 AWD.

Motorway consumption: the Caralogy methodology

The official WLTP figures (18,0 kWh/100km for Seal 390 AWD and 16,5 kWh/100km for Model 3 Performance) are measured on a mixed cycle averaging ~46 km/h. At a steady 130 km/h, aerodynamic drag weighs much more heavily - it grows with the square of speed. Caralogy calculates a motorway consumption specific to each vehicle based on its aerodynamic profile (SCx), weight and power curve - not a uniform correction factor. For this trip, the simulation yields 19,4 kWh/100km (Seal 390 AWD) and 19,9 kWh/100km (Model 3 Performance). Full methodology: see the assumptions below the controls.

Recovery speed: 19,7 km/min versus 9,9 km/min

During the 23 minutes of charging for the Model 3 Performance, range recovers by 454 km. During the 44 cumulative minutes for the Seal 390 AWD, range recovers by 434 km. Per minute: the Model 3 Performance recovers 2,0× faster. At this rate, the charging stop blends into the trip rhythm - just enough time for a coffee. At a lower rate, it dictates the pace.

For reference: how much would an equivalent petrol car cost?

A Peugeot 508 1.6 PureTech 180 (equivalent segment) consumes about 7,2 L/100km on the motorway at 130 km/h. At 1,9 €/L, this Paris → Marseille trip would cost ~103 €. That is 1,7× the electric cost of the Seal 390 AWD and 1,6× that of the Model 3 Performance. The gap narrows in winter but never reverses.

Energy cost breakdown for your trip Paris → Marseille

The cost per kilometre depends on the electricity rate applied to each segment - based on the energy source used at that point of the trip.

BYD Seal 390 AWD

SegmentEnergy usedDistanceConsumption€/kmCost (€)
Paris → Tournus, A6initial energy charged at home · 0.20 €/kWh371 km72 kWh consumed0.039 €/km14.41 €
Tournus, A6 → Valence, A7energy charged at Ionity 113 kW · 0.60 €/kWh165 km32 kWh consumed0.116 €/km19.20 €
Valence, A7 → Manosque, A51energy charged at Ionity 113 kW · 0.60 €/kWh165 km32 kWh consumed0.116 €/km19.20 €
Manosque, A51 → Marseilleenergy charged at Ionity 110 kW · 0.60 €/kWh74 km14 kWh consumed0.116 €/km8.61 €
Trip total61.42 €

Tesla Model 3 Performance

SegmentEnergy usedDistanceConsumption€/kmCost (€)
Paris → Tournus, A6initial energy charged at home · 0.20 €/kWh352 km70 kWh consumed0.040 €/km14.05 €
Tournus, A6 → Valence, A7energy charged at Supercharger 234 kW · 0.60 €/kWh156 km31 kWh consumed0.120 €/km18.72 €
Valence, A7 → Manosque, A51energy charged at Supercharger 234 kW · 0.60 €/kWh156 km31 kWh consumed0.120 €/km18.72 €
Manosque, A51 → Marseilleenergy charged at Supercharger 239 kW · 0.60 €/kWh110 km22 kWh consumed0.120 €/km13.16 €
Trip total64.65 €

Range recovered by stop duration

How many kilometres do you recover depending on the time spent at the charger? Comparison at nominal peak power.
Charging stop durationBYD Seal 390 AWDTesla Model 3 Performance
5 minutes-~73 km
10 minutes-~146 km
20 minutes-~293 km
Full session 10 → 80 %-~274 km · 20 min

What produces these figures

WLTP combined consumption
18.0 kWh/100 km · 16.5 kWh/100 km
Net battery
80 kWh · 78 kWh

Compare with another vehicle

Replace one of the two with an alternative from the same segment

BYDBEV

Seal 390 AWD

530 ch · 80 kWh · 2022

TeslaBEV

Model 3 Performance

456 ch · 78 kWh · 2021

Other duels you might be interested in

BMWVSBYD

i4 M50 xDrive vs Seal 390 AWD

TeslaVSVolvo

Model 3 Performance vs V60 T8 AWD Recharge

BYDVSTesla

Seal 390 AWD vs Model 3 Performance

BMWVSTesla

i4 M50 xDrive vs Model 3 Performance

Frequently asked questions

The advantage comes from the combo real range + charging speed. On Paris → Marseille (775 km at 130 km/h), the Model 3 Performance arrives in 7h24 with 3 charging stops.

WLTP consumption does not reflect motorway reality. Aerodynamic drag grows with the square of speed, so real consumption is 15 to 25 % higher than WLTP combined. Caralogy calculates a highway consumption specific to each vehicle based on its aerodynamic profile (SCx), weight and power curve.

Total time = driving time + charging time. Driving time is calculated at an average speed of 130 km/h on the motorway (adjustable). Charging time is calculated based on the real power curve of each vehicle, respecting the optimal 10 → 80 % range and the maximum power accepted by the chargers on the route.

No. The displayed cost covers only the energy consumed during the trip: kWh × energy rate, with a mix of home charging and DC fast chargers. Battery wear is a long-term ownership cost, not a trip cost.

On this trip, the energy used costs 61.42 € (Seal 390 AWD) and 64.65 € (Model 3 Performance). For reference, an equivalent Peugeot 508 1.6 PureTech 180 (~7.2 L/100 km) would cost about 103 € in fuel.