Among the 28 D-SUV electric 2020–2024, the Ariya 63kWh 2WD 218 ranks 26th of 28 in WLTP range (403 km, behind the Audi SQ6 Sportback e-tron), 24th of 28 in 0–100 km/h (7.5 s, behind the Kia EV6 GT AWD).
FJ0 · GENERATION 2022 → · FAMILY SUV
NissanBEV
Ariya 63kWh 2WD 218
218 hp, 403 km range, 7,5 s 0-100 : among the 28 D-SUV electric 2020–2024, the Ariya 63kWh 2WD 218 ranks 26th of 28 in WLTP range, 24th of 28 in 0–100 km/h. Here is what the Caralogy simulations say.
Power
218hp
300 Nm · 218 hp elec
0 → 100 km/h
7.5s
VMax 160 km/h
Range
403km
WLTP
DC charging
-kW
Technical identity card
Full specifications Nissan Ariya 63kWh 2WD 218
Manufacturer data. Consumption and range estimated from the WLTP cycle; performance simulated by the Caralogy physics engine.
Powertrain
| Puissance électrique | 218 hp |
| Combined power | 218 hp |
| Couple | 300 Nm |
| Gearbox | Mono-rapport Automatique |
Battery and charging
| Battery capacity | 63 kWh |
| Range WLTP | 403 km |
| Conso élec WLTP | 18.0 kWh/100km |
Performance
| 0 → 100 km/h | 7,5 s |
| VMax | 160 km/h |
Dimensions and environment
| Kerb weight | 1,920 kg |
| Cd | 0.29 |
Caralogy Methodology
Performance (0-100, top speed) simulated by the Caralogy physics engine (SCx, Crr, real torque curves). Motorway consumption values estimated from the manufacturer WLTP cycle.
See full methodology →Manufacturer data · WLTP-estimated consumption · Caralogy-simulated performance
Among the 28 D-SUV electric, the Ariya 63kWh 2WD 218 ranks (in the bottom third) in WLTP range. Caralogy simulates its real-world behaviour: motorway simulation, consumption simulation and performance simulation.
Caralogy Analysis
Tailored to this vehicle?
Caralogy Verdict
Suitable for
Long daily commute (>50 km/day) without range anxiety.
Less suitable for
Some metrics lag behind the segment. Check the rankings above to identify weak points.
Alternatives to consider
If the priority is WLTP range, the Audi SQ6 Sportback e-tron (1st with 607 km) takes the lead. If the priority is 0–100 km/h, the Kia EV6 GT AWD (1st with 3.5 s) takes the lead.
Real-world range: 403 km WLTP (26th of 28 in WLTP range)
The Ariya 63kWh 2WD 218 offers 403 km of WLTP range. The segment reference is the Audi SQ6 Sportback e-tron (607 km).
Go beyond this analysis
Recalculate everything for your own profile with the three physics simulators that power this page.
Running cost for your profile
Adjust mileage, driving mix and charging type to estimate your annual energy budget.
Launch simulator →Long-distance trip
Simulate any motorway trip: time, charging stops, total cost.
Simulate a trip →Chronos & accélération
0-100, 0-200, courbe de vitesse, positionnement segment.
Voir la performance →Autonomie réelle
Simulez l’autonomie selon la vitesse, la température et le style.
Simuler l’autonomie →Segment positioning
Where the Ariya 63kWh 2WD 218 stands against D-SUV electric
Comparison across 28 D-SUV electric marketed between 2020–2024.
WLTP range26e / 28
403 km
Min 394 km · Kia EV6 RWD Standard RangeMax 607 km · Audi SQ6 Sportback e-tron
0–100 km/h24e / 28
7,5 s
Min 8,7 s · Skoda Enyaq iV 80 150kWMax 3,5 s · Kia EV6 GT AWD
Direct rivals (same segment, same energy)
ID.4 Pro211 hp · 0-100 8.5 s
Enyaq iV 80 150kW204 hp · 0-100 8.7 s
bZ4X 2WD204 hp · 0-100 8.4 s
Q6 Sportback e-tron252 hp · 0-100 7.6 s
Cross-energy alternatives
Same needs, different powertrain.
Compare
Popular duels involving the Ariya 63kWh 2WD 218
Frequently asked questions
Nissan Ariya 63kWh 2WD 218: what you need to know
Well-argued answers to the most asked questions about this model, based on Caralogy data and simulations.
403 km WLTP announced - making it the 26th of 28 in autonomie du segment out of 28 models. The reference is the Audi SQ6 Sportback e-tron (607 km).
Running costs depend on your profile (mileage, charging type, city/highway mix). Use the Caralogy consumption simulator for a personalised estimate.
The Audi SQ6 Sportback e-tron leads in WLTP range (607 km vs 403 km). The choice depends on your priorities: check the Ariya 63kWh 2WD 218 vs Audi SQ6 Sportback e-tron duel for a detailed comparison.
Caralogy does not reproduce manufacturer figures: we recalculate every number through physics simulation, starting from SCx, mass and the power curve. This is why our figures at 130 km/h differ from WLTP. Full methodology on the dedicated page.