Enyaq iV 80 150kW
204 hp, 517 km range, 8,7 s 0-100 : among the 28 D-SUV electric 2020–2024, the Enyaq iV 80 150kW ranks 7th of 20 in WLTP range, 28th of 28 in 0–100 km/h. Here is what the Caralogy simulations say.
Power
204hp
310 Nm · 204 hp elec
0 → 100 km/h
8.7s
VMax 180 km/h
Range
517km
WLTP
DC charging
—kW
Sur cette page
Technical identity card
Full specifications Skoda Enyaq iV 80 150kW
Manufacturer data and values calibrated by the Caralogy simulation engine.
Powertrain
| Architecture | Unknown |
| Puissance électrique | 204 hp |
| Combined power | 204 hp |
| Couple | 310 Nm |
| Gearbox | REDUCER_2SPEED Automatic |
| Transmission | Enyaq iV 80 150kW |
Battery and charging
| Battery capacity | 77 kWh |
| Range WLTP | 517 km |
| Conso élec WLTP | 16,0 kWh/100km |
| Cons. WLTP | 16,0 L/100km |
Performance
| 0 → 100 km/h | 8,7 s |
| VMax | 180 km/h |
Dimensions and environment
| Kerb weight | 2,078 kg |
| Cd | 0.27 |
Caralogy Methodology
Motorway and performance values calibrated by the Caralogy physics simulation engine (SCx, Crr, real torque curves).
See full methodology →Manufacturer data · motorway values calibrated by the Caralogy engine
Among the 28 D-SUV electric, the Enyaq iV 80 150kW ranks (top 7 in segment) in WLTP range. Caralogy simulates its real-world behaviour: motorway simulation, consumption simulation and performance simulation.
Caralogy Analysis · tailored to this vehicle
Caralogy Verdict
Suitable for
Long daily commute (>50 km/day) without range anxiety. 7th of 20 in WLTP range (517 km).
Less suitable for
Some metrics lag behind the segment. Check the rankings above to identify weak points.
Alternatives to consider
If the priority is WLTP range, the Audi SQ6 Sportback e-tron (1st with 607 km) takes the lead. If the priority is 0–100 km/h, the Kia EV6 GT AWD (1st with 3.5 s) takes the lead.
Real-world range: 517 km WLTP (7th of 20 in WLTP range)
The Enyaq iV 80 150kW offers 517 km of WLTP range. The segment reference is the Audi SQ6 Sportback e-tron (607 km).
Go beyond this analysis
Recalculate everything for your own profile with the three physics simulators that power this page.
Running cost for your profile
Adjust mileage, driving mix and charging type to estimate your annual energy budget.
Launch simulator →Long-distance trip
Simulate any motorway trip: time, charging stops, total cost.
Simulate a trip →Chronos & accélération
0-100, 0-200, courbe de vitesse, positionnement segment.
Voir la performance →Duel against a rival
Calibrated drag race, speed stages, comparative technical analysis.
Start a duel →Segment positioning
Where the Enyaq iV 80 150kW stands against D-SUV electric
Comparison across 28 D-SUV electric marketed between 2020–2024.
WLTP range
7eout of 20
0–100 km/h
28eout of 28
Direct rivals (same segment, same energy)
bZ4X 2WD
204 hp · 0-100 8.4 s
ID.4 Pro
211 hp · 0-100 8.5 s
Q6 Sportback e-tron
252 hp · 0-100 7.6 s
Mustang Mach-E RWD
269 hp · 0-100 6.1 s
Cross-energy alternatives
Same needs, different powertrain.
Compare
Popular duels involving the Enyaq iV 80 150kW
Take the next step
Find a Enyaq iV 80 150kW or value yours
Caralogy receives no commission on these external links.
Frequently asked questions
Skoda Enyaq iV 80 150kW: what you need to know
Well-argued answers to the most asked questions about this model, based on Caralogy data and simulations.
Among the 28 D-SUV electric 2020–2024, the Enyaq iV 80 150kW ranks 7th of 20 in WLTP range (517 km, behind the Audi SQ6 Sportback e-tron), 28th of 28 in 0–100 km/h (8.7 s, behind the Kia EV6 GT AWD).
517 km WLTP announced — making it the 7th of 20 in autonomie du segment out of 20 models. The reference is the Audi SQ6 Sportback e-tron (607 km).
Running costs depend on your profile (mileage, charging type, city/highway mix). Use the Caralogy consumption simulator for a personalised estimate.
The Audi SQ6 Sportback e-tron leads in WLTP range (607 km vs 517 km). The choice depends on your priorities: check the Enyaq iV 80 150kW vs Audi SQ6 Sportback e-tron duel for a detailed comparison.
Caralogy does not reproduce manufacturer figures: we recalculate every number through physics simulation, starting from SCx, mass and the power curve. This is why our figures at 130 km/h differ from WLTP. Full methodology on the dedicated page.