Insignia B Grand Sport 2.0 CDTi 210 8AT
209 hp, 7,8 s 0-100 : among the 30 saloons 2015–2019, the Insignia B Grand Sport 2.0 CDTi 210 8AT ranks 9th of 30 in Combined consumption, 25th of 30 in 0–100 km/h. Here is what the Caralogy simulations say.
Power
209hp
450 Nm
0 → 100 km/h
7.8s
VMax 240 km/h
Cons.
5.2L
/100 km
Tank
—L
Sur cette page
Technical identity card
Full specifications Opel Insignia B Grand Sport 2.0 CDTi 210 8AT
Manufacturer data and values calibrated by the Caralogy simulation engine.
Powertrain
| Architecture | Unknown |
| Power | 209 hp |
| Couple | 450 Nm |
| Gearbox | Torque Converter 8 rapports Automatic |
| Transmission | Insignia B Grand Sport 2.0 CDTi 210 8AT |
Consumption
| Cons. WLTP | 5,2 L/100km |
Performance
| 0 → 100 km/h | 7,8 s |
| VMax | 240 km/h |
Dimensions and environment
| Kerb weight | 1,700 kg |
| Cd | 0.26 |
Caralogy Methodology
Motorway and performance values calibrated by the Caralogy physics simulation engine (SCx, Crr, real torque curves).
See full methodology →Manufacturer data · motorway values calibrated by the Caralogy engine
Among the 30 saloons, the Insignia B Grand Sport 2.0 CDTi 210 8AT ranks (top 9 in segment) in fuel consumption. Caralogy simulates its real-world cost: motorway simulation, consumption simulation and performance simulation.
Caralogy Analysis · tailored to this vehicle
Caralogy Verdict
Suitable for
Good compromise for regular use without available charging infrastructure. 9th of 30 in Combined consumption (5.2 L/100).
Less suitable for
Some metrics lag behind the segment. Check the rankings above to identify weak points.
Alternatives to consider
If the priority is Combined consumption, the Bmw 318d Steptronic (1st with 4.5 L/100) takes the lead. If the priority is 0–100 km/h, the Alfa Romeo Giulia Quadrifoglio (1st with 3.9 s) takes the lead.
Fuel consumption: 5.2 L/100 L/100 (9th of 30 in Combined consumption)
The Insignia B Grand Sport 2.0 CDTi 210 8AT consumes 5.2 L/100 on the WLTP combined cycle. The segment reference is the Bmw 318d Steptronic (4.5 L/100).
Go beyond this analysis
Recalculate everything for your own profile with the three physics simulators that power this page.
Running cost for your profile
Adjust mileage, driving mix and charging type to estimate your annual energy budget.
Launch simulator →Long-distance trip
Simulate any motorway trip: time, charging stops, total cost.
Simulate a trip →Chronos & accélération
0-100, 0-200, courbe de vitesse, positionnement segment.
Voir la performance →Duel against a rival
Calibrated drag race, speed stages, comparative technical analysis.
Start a duel →Segment positioning
Where the Insignia B Grand Sport 2.0 CDTi 210 8AT stands against saloons
Comparison across 30 saloons marketed between 2015–2019.
Combined consumption
9eout of 30
0–100 km/h
25eout of 30
Direct rivals (same segment, same energy)
430i Convertible
258 hp · 0-100 6.2 s
330i
258 hp · 0-100 5.8 s
330i Sedan
258 hp · 0-100 5.9 s
330i xDrive Touring
258 hp · 0-100 5.8 s
Cross-energy alternatives
Same needs, different powertrain.
Compare
Popular duels involving the Insignia B Grand Sport 2.0 CDTi 210 8AT
Take the next step
Find a Insignia B Grand Sport 2.0 CDTi 210 8AT or value yours
Caralogy receives no commission on these external links.
Frequently asked questions
Opel Insignia B Grand Sport 2.0 CDTi 210 8AT: what you need to know
Well-argued answers to the most asked questions about this model, based on Caralogy data and simulations.
Among the 30 saloons 2015–2019, the Insignia B Grand Sport 2.0 CDTi 210 8AT ranks 9th of 30 in Combined consumption (5.2 L/100, behind the Bmw 318d Steptronic), 25th of 30 in 0–100 km/h (7.8 s, behind the Alfa Romeo Giulia Quadrifoglio).
Running costs depend on your profile (mileage, charging type, city/highway mix). Use the Caralogy consumption simulator for a personalised estimate.
The Bmw 318d Steptronic leads in Combined consumption (4.5 L/100 vs 5.2 L/100). The choice depends on your priorities: check the Insignia B Grand Sport 2.0 CDTi 210 8AT vs Bmw 318d Steptronic duel for a detailed comparison.
Caralogy does not reproduce manufacturer figures: we recalculate every number through physics simulation, starting from SCx, mass and the power curve. This is why our figures at 130 km/h differ from WLTP. Full methodology on the dedicated page.