BMW 420d Convertible

DieselsaloonGENERATION G22, 2021

190 hp, 7,6 s 0-100 : among the 86 saloons 2019–2023, the 420d Convertible ranks 6th of 86 in Combined consumption, 3rd of 73 in Tank range, 72th of 86 in 0–100 km/h. Here is what the Caralogy simulations say.

Power
190 hp
400 Nm
0 → 100 km/h
7.6 s
VMax 236 km/h
Cons.
4.5 L
/100 km
Tank
59 L

Full specifications

Manufacturer data. Consumption and range estimated from the WLTP cycle; performance simulated by the Caralogy physics engine.

Powertrain

Architecture
4 cyl.
Displacement
1,995 cm³
Power
190 hp
Couple
400 Nm
Gearbox
Convertisseur de couple 8 rapports Automatique

Consumption

Cons. WLTP
4.5 L/100 km
Tank
59 L

Performance

0 → 100 km/h
7,6 s
VMax
236 km/h

Dimensions and environment

Length
4,768 mm
Wheelbase
2,851 mm
Width
1,852 mm
Height
1,384 mm
Boot
385 L
Kerb weight
1,775 kg
Cd
0.27
CO₂ WLTP
119 g/km

Caralogy Methodology

Performance (0-100, top speed) simulated by the Caralogy physics engine (SCx, Crr, real torque curves). Motorway consumption values estimated from the manufacturer WLTP cycle.

See full methodology

Manufacturer data · WLTP-estimated consumption · Caralogy-simulated performance

Among the 86 saloons, the 420d Convertible ranks (top 6 in segment) in fuel consumption. Caralogy simulates its real-world cost: motorway simulation, consumption simulation and performance simulation.

Tailored to this vehicle?

Caralogy Verdict
Suitable for

Good compromise for regular use without available charging infrastructure. 6th of 86 in Combined consumption (4.5 L/100), 3rd of 73 in Tank range (1311 km).

Less suitable for

Some metrics lag behind the segment. Check the rankings above to identify weak points.

Alternatives to consider

If the priority is Combined consumption, the BMW 420d (1st with 4.2 L/100) takes the lead. If the priority is Tank range, the BMW 420d (1st with 1405 km) takes the lead.

Fuel consumption: 4.5 L/100 L/100 (6th of 86 in Combined consumption)

The 420d Convertible consumes 4.5 L/100 on the WLTP combined cycle. The segment reference is the BMW 420d (4.2 L/100).

Tank range: 1311 km (3rd of 73 in Tank range)

On a full tank, the 420d Convertible covers 1311 km on the combined cycle. The segment reference reaches 1405 km.

Where the 420d Convertible stands against saloons

Comparison across 86 saloons marketed between 2019–2023.
Combined consumption6e / 86
4.5 L/100
Min 14.9 L/100 · Lexus IS 500 F Sport RWDMax 4.2 L/100 · BMW 420d
Tank range3e / 73
1 311 km
Min 500 km · Kia Stinger GT 3.3T AWDMax 1 405 km · BMW 420d
0–100 km/h72e / 86
7,6 s
Min 8,9 s · BMW 318d TouringMax 3,5 s · BMW M3 Competition xDrive

Direct rivals (same segment, same energy)

Cross-energy alternatives

Same needs, different powertrain.

The full BMW 4 Series G22 range

Generation G22 launched in 2021. Available versions sorted by energy.

Other versions of the G22

Popular duels involving the 420d Convertible

Continue with the BMW 420d Convertible

The same car, from other angles.

BMW 420d Convertible: what you need to know

Well-argued answers to the most asked questions about this model, based on Caralogy data and simulations.

Where does the 420d Convertible rank in its segment?

Among the 86 saloons 2019–2023, the 420d Convertible ranks 6th of 86 in Combined consumption (4.5 L/100, behind the BMW 420d), 3rd of 73 in Tank range (1311 km, behind the BMW 420d), 72th of 86 in 0–100 km/h (7.6 s, behind the BMW M3 Competition xDrive).

What is the range of the 420d Convertible?

1311 km on a full tank (4.5 L/100 on the combined cycle) - 3rd of 73 in Tank range.

How much does the 420d Convertible cost to run?

Running costs depend on your profile (mileage, charging type, city/highway mix). Use the Caralogy consumption simulator for a personalised estimate.

Why not a BMW 420d instead?

The BMW 420d leads in Combined consumption (4.2 L/100 vs 4.5 L/100). The choice depends on your priorities: check the 420d Convertible vs BMW 420d duel for a detailed comparison.

How does Caralogy calculate its figures?

Caralogy does not reproduce manufacturer figures: we recalculate every number through physics simulation, starting from SCx, mass and the power curve. This is why our figures at 130 km/h differ from WLTP. Full methodology on the dedicated page.