II · GENERATION 2017 · COMPACT
PeugeotICE

308 PureTech 130

131 hp, 9,9 s 0-100 : among the 65 compacts 2015–2019, the 308 PureTech 130 ranks 32th of 63 in Combined consumption, 24th of 56 in Tank range, 58th of 65 in 0–100 km/h. Here is what the Caralogy simulations say.

Energy cost · estimate1,75715,000 km · UK mix · home UK £/kWhConsommation →

Power

131hp

230 Nm

0 → 100 km/h

9.9s

VMax 210 km/h

Cons.

5.8L

/100 km

Tank

53L

Sur cette page

Technical identity card

Full specifications Peugeot 308 PureTech 130

Manufacturer data and values calibrated by the Caralogy simulation engine.

Powertrain

ArchitectureUnknown · 3 cyl.
Displacement1,199 cm\u00b3
Power131 hp
Couple230 Nm
GearboxTORQUE_CONVERTER 6 rapports Automatic
TransmissionFWD

Consumption

Cons. WLTP5,8 L/100km
Tank53 L

Performance

0 → 100 km/h9,9 s
VMax210 km/h

Dimensions and environment

Kerb weight1,220 kg
Cd0.28
CO₂ WLTP132 g/km

Caralogy Methodology

Motorway and performance values calibrated by the Caralogy physics simulation engine (SCx, Crr, real torque curves).

See full methodology →

Manufacturer data · motorway values calibrated by the Caralogy engine

Among the 65 compacts, the 308 PureTech 130 ranks (mid-table) in fuel consumption. Caralogy simulates its real-world cost: motorway simulation, consumption simulation and performance simulation.

Caralogy Analysis · tailored to this vehicle

Caralogy Verdict

Suitable for

Good compromise for regular use without available charging infrastructure.

Less suitable for

Some metrics lag behind the segment. Check the rankings above to identify weak points.

Alternatives to consider

If the priority is Combined consumption, the Bmw 116d (1st with 4.2 L/100) takes the lead. If the priority is Tank range, the Bmw 116d (1st with 1209 km) takes the lead.

Fuel consumption: 5.8 L/100 L/100 (32th of 63 in Combined consumption)

The 308 PureTech 130 consumes 5.8 L/100 on the WLTP combined cycle. The segment reference is the Bmw 116d (4.2 L/100).

Tank range: 914 km (24th of 56 in Tank range)

On a full tank, the 308 PureTech 130 covers 914 km on the combined cycle. The segment reference reaches 1209 km.

Segment positioning

Where the 308 PureTech 130 stands against compacts

Comparison across 65 compacts marketed between 2015–2019.

Combined consumption

32eout of 63

5.8 L/100
Min10 L/100 · Bmw M2 Competition
Max4.2 L/100 · Bmw 116d

Tank range

24eout of 56

914 km
Min520 km · Bmw M2 Competition
Max1 209 km · Bmw 116d

0–100 km/h

58eout of 65

9,9 s
Min11,7 s · Fiat Tipo 1.4 100 6M
Max4,4 s · Bmw M140i xDrive

Direct rivals (same segment, same energy)

Cross-energy alternatives

Same needs, different powertrain.

Model family

The full Peugeot 308 II range

Generation II launched in 2013. Available versions sorted by energy.

Other versions of the II

Compare

Popular duels involving the 308 PureTech 130

Take the next step

Find a 308 PureTech 130 or value yours

Caralogy receives no commission on these external links.

Frequently asked questions

Peugeot 308 PureTech 130: what you need to know

Well-argued answers to the most asked questions about this model, based on Caralogy data and simulations.

Where does the 308 PureTech 130 rank in its segment?#

Among the 65 compacts 2015–2019, the 308 PureTech 130 ranks 32th of 63 in Combined consumption (5.8 L/100, behind the Bmw 116d), 24th of 56 in Tank range (914 km, behind the Bmw 116d), 58th of 65 in 0–100 km/h (9.9 s, behind the Bmw M140i xDrive).

What is the range of the 308 PureTech 130?#

914 km on a full tank (5.8 L/100 on the combined cycle) — 24th of 56 in autonomie du segment.

How much does the 308 PureTech 130 cost to run?#

Running costs depend on your profile (mileage, charging type, city/highway mix). Use the Caralogy consumption simulator for a personalised estimate.

Why not a Bmw 116d instead?#

The Bmw 116d leads in Combined consumption (4.2 L/100 vs 5.8 L/100). The choice depends on your priorities: check the 308 PureTech 130 vs Bmw 116d duel for a detailed comparison.

How does Caralogy calculate its figures?#

Caralogy does not reproduce manufacturer figures: we recalculate every number through physics simulation, starting from SCx, mass and the power curve. This is why our figures at 130 km/h differ from WLTP. Full methodology on the dedicated page.