II · GENERATION 2015 · COMPACT
PeugeotICE

308 GTi 270

272 hp, 6,0 s 0-100 : among the 12 compacts 2013–2017, the 308 GTi 270 ranks 8th of 10 in Combined consumption, 5th of 6 in Tank range, 2nd of 12 in 0–100 km/h. Here is what the Caralogy simulations say.

Energy cost · estimate2,00015,000 km · UK mix · home 0,21 £/kWhConsumption →

Power

272hp

330 Nm

0 → 100 km/h

6.0s

VMax 250 km/h

Cons.

6.6L

/100 km

Tank

53L

Technical identity card

Full specifications Peugeot 308 GTi 270

Manufacturer data. Consumption and range estimated from the WLTP cycle; performance simulated by the Caralogy physics engine.

Powertrain

Displacement1,598 cm³
Power272 hp
Couple330 Nm
GearboxManuelle 6 rapports Manuelle
TransmissionTraction

Consumption

Cons. WLTP6.6 L/100km
Tank53 L

Performance

0 → 100 km/h6,0 s
VMax250 km/h

Dimensions and environment

Length4,253 mm
Wheelbase2,620 mm
Width1,804 mm
Height1,462 mm
Kerb weight1,260 kg
Cd0.28

Caralogy Methodology

Performance (0-100, top speed) simulated by the Caralogy physics engine (SCx, Crr, real torque curves). Motorway consumption values estimated from the manufacturer WLTP cycle.

See full methodology →

Manufacturer data · WLTP-estimated consumption · Caralogy-simulated performance

Among the 12 compacts, the 308 GTi 270 ranks (in the bottom third) in fuel consumption. Caralogy simulates its real-world cost: motorway simulation, consumption simulation and performance simulation.

Caralogy Analysis

Tailored to this vehicle?

Caralogy Verdict
Suitable for

compact among the best in segment: 2nd of 12 in 0–100 km/h (6.0 s).

Less suitable for

Some metrics lag behind the segment. Check the rankings above to identify weak points.

Alternatives to consider

If the priority is Combined consumption, the Kia Ceed 1.6 CRDi 136 FWD (1st with 4.5 L/100) takes the lead. If the priority is Tank range, the Kia Ceed 1.6 CRDi 136 FWD (1st with 1111 km) takes the lead.

Fuel consumption: 6.6 L/100 L/100 (8th of 10 in Combined consumption)

The 308 GTi 270 consumes 6.6 L/100 on the WLTP combined cycle. The segment reference is the Kia Ceed 1.6 CRDi 136 FWD (4.5 L/100).

Tank range: 803 km (5th of 6 in Tank range)

On a full tank, the 308 GTi 270 covers 803 km on the combined cycle. The segment reference reaches 1111 km.

Segment positioning

Where the 308 GTi 270 stands against compacts

Comparison across 12 compacts marketed between 2013–2017.

Combined consumption8e / 10
6.6 L/100
Min 6.8 L/100 · Ford Focus ST 250 Gen3Max 4.5 L/100 · Kia Ceed 1.6 CRDi 136 FWD
Tank range5e / 6
803 km
Min 762 km · Fiat Tipo 1.4 100 6MMax 1 111 km · Kia Ceed 1.6 CRDi 136 FWD
0–100 km/h2e / 12
6,0 s
Min 11,7 s · Fiat Tipo 1.4 100 6MMax 4,9 s · Volkswagen Golf 7 R

Direct rivals (same segment, same energy)

Cross-energy alternatives

Same needs, different powertrain.

Model family

The full Peugeot 308 II range

Generation II launched in 2013. Available versions sorted by energy.

Other versions of the II

Compare

Popular duels involving the 308 GTi 270

Frequently asked questions

Peugeot 308 GTi 270: what you need to know

Well-argued answers to the most asked questions about this model, based on Caralogy data and simulations.

Among the 12 compacts 2013–2017, the 308 GTi 270 ranks 8th of 10 in Combined consumption (6.6 L/100, behind the Kia Ceed 1.6 CRDi 136 FWD), 5th of 6 in Tank range (803 km, behind the Kia Ceed 1.6 CRDi 136 FWD), 2nd of 12 in 0–100 km/h (6.0 s, behind the Volkswagen Golf 7 R).

803 km on a full tank (6.6 L/100 on the combined cycle) - 5th of 6 in autonomie du segment.

Running costs depend on your profile (mileage, charging type, city/highway mix). Use the Caralogy consumption simulator for a personalised estimate.

The Kia Ceed 1.6 CRDi 136 FWD leads in Combined consumption (4.5 L/100 vs 6.6 L/100). The choice depends on your priorities: check the 308 GTi 270 vs Kia Ceed 1.6 CRDi 136 FWD duel for a detailed comparison.

Caralogy does not reproduce manufacturer figures: we recalculate every number through physics simulation, starting from SCx, mass and the power curve. This is why our figures at 130 km/h differ from WLTP. Full methodology on the dedicated page.