Peugeot 308 GTi 270
272 hp, 6,0 s 0-100 : among the 12 compacts 2013–2017, the 308 GTi 270 ranks 8th of 10 in Combined consumption, 5th of 6 in Tank range, 2nd of 12 in 0–100 km/h. Here is what the Caralogy simulations say.
- Power
- 272 hp
- 330 Nm
- 0 → 100 km/h
- 6.0 s
- VMax 250 km/h
- Cons.
- 6.6 L
- /100 km
- Tank
- 53 L
Full specifications
Manufacturer data. Consumption and range estimated from the WLTP cycle; performance simulated by the Caralogy physics engine.
Powertrain
- Displacement
- 1,598 cm³
- Power
- 272 hp
- Couple
- 330 Nm
- Gearbox
- Manuelle 6 rapports Manuelle
- Transmission
- Traction
Consumption
- Cons. WLTP
- 6.6 L/100 km
- Tank
- 53 L
Performance
- 0 → 100 km/h
- 6,0 s
- VMax
- 250 km/h
Dimensions and environment
- Length
- 4,253 mm
- Wheelbase
- 2,620 mm
- Width
- 1,804 mm
- Height
- 1,462 mm
- Kerb weight
- 1,260 kg
- Cd
- 0.28
Caralogy Methodology
Performance (0-100, top speed) simulated by the Caralogy physics engine (SCx, Crr, real torque curves). Motorway consumption values estimated from the manufacturer WLTP cycle.
See full methodologyManufacturer data · WLTP-estimated consumption · Caralogy-simulated performance
Among the 12 compacts, the 308 GTi 270 ranks (in the bottom third) in fuel consumption. Caralogy simulates its real-world cost: motorway simulation, consumption simulation and performance simulation.
Tailored to this vehicle?
compact among the best in segment: 2nd of 12 in 0–100 km/h (6.0 s).
Some metrics lag behind the segment. Check the rankings above to identify weak points.
If the priority is Combined consumption, the Kia Ceed 1.6 CRDi 136 FWD (1st with 4.5 L/100) takes the lead. If the priority is Tank range, the Kia Ceed 1.6 CRDi 136 FWD (1st with 1111 km) takes the lead.
Fuel consumption: 6.6 L/100 L/100 (8th of 10 in Combined consumption)
The 308 GTi 270 consumes 6.6 L/100 on the WLTP combined cycle. The segment reference is the Kia Ceed 1.6 CRDi 136 FWD (4.5 L/100).
Tank range: 803 km (5th of 6 in Tank range)
On a full tank, the 308 GTi 270 covers 803 km on the combined cycle. The segment reference reaches 1111 km.
Go beyond this analysis
Recalculate everything for your own profile with the three physics simulators that power this page.
Running cost for your profile
Adjust mileage, driving mix and charging type to estimate your annual energy budget.
Launch simulatorLong-distance trip
Simulate any motorway trip: time, charging stops, total cost.
Simulate a tripTimes & acceleration
0-100, 0-200, speed curve, segment position.
See the performanceWhere the 308 GTi 270 stands against compacts
Direct rivals (same segment, same energy)
Cross-energy alternatives
Same needs, different powertrain.
The full Peugeot 308 II range
Generation II launched in 2013. Available versions sorted by energy.
Other versions of the II
Popular duels involving the 308 GTi 270
Continue with the Peugeot 308 GTi 270
The same car, from other angles.
Peugeot 308 GTi 270: what you need to know
Well-argued answers to the most asked questions about this model, based on Caralogy data and simulations.
Where does the 308 GTi 270 rank in its segment?
Among the 12 compacts 2013–2017, the 308 GTi 270 ranks 8th of 10 in Combined consumption (6.6 L/100, behind the Kia Ceed 1.6 CRDi 136 FWD), 5th of 6 in Tank range (803 km, behind the Kia Ceed 1.6 CRDi 136 FWD), 2nd of 12 in 0–100 km/h (6.0 s, behind the Volkswagen Golf 7 R).
What is the range of the 308 GTi 270?
803 km on a full tank (6.6 L/100 on the combined cycle) - 5th of 6 in Tank range.
How much does the 308 GTi 270 cost to run?
Running costs depend on your profile (mileage, charging type, city/highway mix). Use the Caralogy consumption simulator for a personalised estimate.
Why not a Kia Ceed 1.6 CRDi 136 FWD instead?
The Kia Ceed 1.6 CRDi 136 FWD leads in Combined consumption (4.5 L/100 vs 6.6 L/100). The choice depends on your priorities: check the 308 GTi 270 vs Kia Ceed 1.6 CRDi 136 FWD duel for a detailed comparison.
How does Caralogy calculate its figures?
Caralogy does not reproduce manufacturer figures: we recalculate every number through physics simulation, starting from SCx, mass and the power curve. This is why our figures at 130 km/h differ from WLTP. Full methodology on the dedicated page.