Among the 17 E-SUV 2010–2014, the Cayenne S (8-speed Tiptronic S) ranks 8th of 17 in 0–100 km/h (5.7 s, behind the Porsche Cayenne Turbo S), 8th of 17 in Top speed (258 km/h, behind the Porsche Cayenne Turbo S), 6th of 17 in Power-to-weight (203 hp/t, behind the Porsche Cayenne Turbo S).
Cayenne S (8-speed Tiptronic S)
420 hp, 5,7 s 0-100 : among the 17 E-SUV 2010–2014, the Cayenne S (8-speed Tiptronic S) ranks 8th of 17 in 0–100 km/h, 8th of 17 in Top speed, 6th of 17 in Power-to-weight, behind the only Porsche Cayenne Turbo S. Here is what the Caralogy simulations say.
Power
420hp
550 Nm
0 → 100 km/h
5.7s
VMax 258 km/h
Cons.
11.4L
/100 km
Tank
84.793184L
Full specifications Porsche Cayenne S (8-speed Tiptronic S)
Manufacturer data. Consumption and range estimated from the WLTP cycle; performance simulated by the Caralogy physics engine.
Powertrain
| Architecture | V · 8 cyl. · Atmosphérique |
| Displacement | 4,806 cm³ |
| Puissance thermique | 406 hp |
| Combined power | 420 hp |
| Combined torque | 550 Nm |
| Gearbox | Convertisseur de couple 8 rapports Automatique |
| Transmission | Integrale (AWD) |
Consumption
| Cons. WLTP | 11.4 L/100km |
| Tank | 84.793184 L |
Performance
| 0 → 100 km/h | 5,7 s |
| VMax | 258 km/h |
Dimensions and environment
| Length | 4,846 mm |
| Wheelbase | 2,895 mm |
| Width | 1,939 mm |
| Height | 1,705 mm |
| Boot | 671 L |
| Kerb weight | 2,065 kg |
| Cd | 0.36 |
Caralogy Methodology
Performance (0-100, top speed) simulated by the Caralogy physics engine (SCx, Crr, real torque curves). Motorway consumption values estimated from the manufacturer WLTP cycle.
See full methodology →Manufacturer data · WLTP-estimated consumption · Caralogy-simulated performance
Among the 17 E-SUV, the Cayenne S (8-speed Tiptronic S) ranks (mid-table) in acceleration. Caralogy simulates its real-world performance: motorway simulation, performance simulation and consumption simulation.
Tailored to this vehicle?
Demanding drivers: 6th of 17 in Power-to-weight (203 hp/t). 6th of 17 in Power-to-weight (203 hp/t).
Frequent urban trips with stop-and-go. At 11,4 L/100 km on the combined cycle, consumption rises in the city without electric assistance. An HEV or PHEV would be more economical for this use profile.
If the priority is 0–100 km/h, the Porsche Cayenne Turbo S (1st with 4.4 s) takes the lead. If the priority is Top speed, the Porsche Cayenne Turbo S (1st with 282 km/h) takes the lead.
Acceleration: 5.7 s 0-100 (8th of 17 in 0–100 km/h)
In pure acceleration, the Cayenne S (8-speed Tiptronic S) ranks 8th of 17 in 0–100 km/h, 1.3 s off the reference Porsche Cayenne Turbo S (4.4 s).
Top speed: 258 km/h (8th of 17 in Top speed)
Top speed of 258 km/h. The segment reference reaches 282 km/h.
Recalculate everything for your own profile with the three physics simulators that power this page.
Running cost for your profile
Adjust mileage, driving mix and charging type to estimate your annual energy budget.
Launch simulator →Long-distance trip
Simulate any motorway trip: time, charging stops, total cost.
Simulate a trip →Chronos & accélération
0-100, 0-200, courbe de vitesse, positionnement segment.
Voir la performance →Where the Cayenne S (8-speed Tiptronic S) stands against E-SUV
Comparison across 17 E-SUV marketed between 2010–2014.
Direct rivals (same segment, same energy)
Cross-energy alternatives
Same needs, different powertrain.
Popular duels involving the Cayenne S (8-speed Tiptronic S)
Porsche Cayenne S (8-speed Tiptronic S): what you need to know
Well-argued answers to the most asked questions about this model, based on Caralogy data and simulations.
Running costs depend on your profile (mileage, charging type, city/highway mix). Use the Caralogy consumption simulator for a personalised estimate.
The Porsche Cayenne Turbo S leads in 0–100 km/h (4.4 s vs 5.7 s). The choice depends on your priorities: check the Cayenne S (8-speed Tiptronic S) vs Porsche Cayenne Turbo S duel for a detailed comparison.
Caralogy does not reproduce manufacturer figures: we recalculate every number through physics simulation, starting from SCx, mass and the power curve. This is why our figures at 130 km/h differ from WLTP. Full methodology on the dedicated page.