958.1 · GENERATION 2012 · LARGE SUV
PorscheICE

Cayenne S (8-speed Tiptronic S)

420 hp, 5,7 s 0-100 : among the 17 E-SUV 2010–2014, the Cayenne S (8-speed Tiptronic S) ranks 8th of 17 in 0–100 km/h, 8th of 17 in Top speed, 6th of 17 in Power-to-weight, behind the only Porsche Cayenne Turbo S. Here is what the Caralogy simulations say.

Energy cost · estimate3,45415,000 km · UK mix · home 0,21 £/kWhConsumption →

Power

420hp

550 Nm

0 → 100 km/h

5.7s

VMax 258 km/h

Cons.

11.4L

/100 km

Tank

84.793184L

Technical identity card

Full specifications Porsche Cayenne S (8-speed Tiptronic S)

Manufacturer data. Consumption and range estimated from the WLTP cycle; performance simulated by the Caralogy physics engine.

Powertrain

ArchitectureV · 8 cyl. · Atmosphérique
Displacement4,806 cm³
Puissance thermique406 hp
Combined power420 hp
Combined torque550 Nm
GearboxConvertisseur de couple 8 rapports Automatique
TransmissionIntegrale (AWD)

Consumption

Cons. WLTP11.4 L/100km
Tank84.793184 L

Performance

0 → 100 km/h5,7 s
VMax258 km/h

Dimensions and environment

Length4,846 mm
Wheelbase2,895 mm
Width1,939 mm
Height1,705 mm
Boot671 L
Kerb weight2,065 kg
Cd0.36

Caralogy Methodology

Performance (0-100, top speed) simulated by the Caralogy physics engine (SCx, Crr, real torque curves). Motorway consumption values estimated from the manufacturer WLTP cycle.

See full methodology →

Manufacturer data · WLTP-estimated consumption · Caralogy-simulated performance

Among the 17 E-SUV, the Cayenne S (8-speed Tiptronic S) ranks (mid-table) in acceleration. Caralogy simulates its real-world performance: motorway simulation, performance simulation and consumption simulation.

Caralogy Analysis

Tailored to this vehicle?

Caralogy Verdict
Suitable for

Demanding drivers: 6th of 17 in Power-to-weight (203 hp/t). 6th of 17 in Power-to-weight (203 hp/t).

Less suitable for

Frequent urban trips with stop-and-go. At 11,4 L/100 km on the combined cycle, consumption rises in the city without electric assistance. An HEV or PHEV would be more economical for this use profile.

Alternatives to consider

If the priority is 0–100 km/h, the Porsche Cayenne Turbo S (1st with 4.4 s) takes the lead. If the priority is Top speed, the Porsche Cayenne Turbo S (1st with 282 km/h) takes the lead.

Acceleration: 5.7 s 0-100 (8th of 17 in 0–100 km/h)

In pure acceleration, the Cayenne S (8-speed Tiptronic S) ranks 8th of 17 in 0–100 km/h, 1.3 s off the reference Porsche Cayenne Turbo S (4.4 s).

Top speed: 258 km/h (8th of 17 in Top speed)

Top speed of 258 km/h. The segment reference reaches 282 km/h.

Segment positioning

Where the Cayenne S (8-speed Tiptronic S) stands against E-SUV

Comparison across 17 E-SUV marketed between 2010–2014.

0–100 km/h8e / 17
5,7 s
Min 7,5 s · Porsche Cayenne (8-speed Tiptronic S)Max 4,4 s · Porsche Cayenne Turbo S
Top speed8e / 17
258 km/h
Min 229 km/h · Porsche Cayenne Platinum EditionMax 282 km/h · Porsche Cayenne Turbo S
Power-to-weight6e / 17
203 hp/t
Min 150 hp/t · Porsche Cayenne (8-speed Tiptronic S)Max 263 hp/t · Porsche Cayenne Turbo S

Direct rivals (same segment, same energy)

Cross-energy alternatives

Same needs, different powertrain.

Compare

Popular duels involving the Cayenne S (8-speed Tiptronic S)

Frequently asked questions

Porsche Cayenne S (8-speed Tiptronic S): what you need to know

Well-argued answers to the most asked questions about this model, based on Caralogy data and simulations.

Among the 17 E-SUV 2010–2014, the Cayenne S (8-speed Tiptronic S) ranks 8th of 17 in 0–100 km/h (5.7 s, behind the Porsche Cayenne Turbo S), 8th of 17 in Top speed (258 km/h, behind the Porsche Cayenne Turbo S), 6th of 17 in Power-to-weight (203 hp/t, behind the Porsche Cayenne Turbo S).

Running costs depend on your profile (mileage, charging type, city/highway mix). Use the Caralogy consumption simulator for a personalised estimate.

Caralogy does not reproduce manufacturer figures: we recalculate every number through physics simulation, starting from SCx, mass and the power curve. This is why our figures at 130 km/h differ from WLTP. Full methodology on the dedicated page.