Cayenne S (8-speed Tiptronic S)
420 hp, 5,7 s 0-100 : among the 21 E-SUV 2010–2014, the Cayenne S (8-speed Tiptronic S) ranks 10th of 21 in 0–100 km/h, 10th of 21 in Top speed, 8th of 21 in Power-to-weight, behind the only Porsche Cayenne Turbo S. Here is what the Caralogy simulations say.
Power
420hp
550 Nm
0 → 100 km/h
5.7s
VMax 258 km/h
Cons.
11.4L
/100 km
Tank
84.793184L
Sur cette page
Technical identity card
Full specifications Porsche Cayenne S (8-speed Tiptronic S)
Manufacturer data and values calibrated by the Caralogy simulation engine.
Powertrain
| Architecture | V · 8 cyl. · Naturally Aspirated |
| Displacement | 4,806 cm\u00b3 |
| Puissance thermique | 406 hp |
| Combined power | 420 hp |
| Combined torque | 550 Nm |
| Gearbox | TORQUE_CONVERTER 8 rapports Automatic |
| Transmission | AWD |
Consumption
| Cons. WLTP | 11,4 L/100km |
| Tank | 84.793184 L |
Performance
| 0 → 100 km/h | 5,7 s |
| VMax | 258 km/h |
Dimensions and environment
| Length | 4,846 mm |
| Wheelbase | 2,895 mm |
| Width | 1,939 mm |
| Height | 1,705 mm |
| Boot | 671 L |
| Kerb weight | 2,065 kg |
| Cd | 0.36 |
Caralogy Methodology
Motorway and performance values calibrated by the Caralogy physics simulation engine (SCx, Crr, real torque curves).
See full methodology →Manufacturer data · motorway values calibrated by the Caralogy engine
Among the 21 E-SUV, the Cayenne S (8-speed Tiptronic S) ranks (mid-table) in acceleration. Caralogy simulates its real-world performance: motorway simulation, performance simulation and consumption simulation.
Caralogy Analysis · tailored to this vehicle
Acceleration: 5.7 s 0-100 (10th of 21 in 0–100 km/h)
In pure acceleration, the Cayenne S (8-speed Tiptronic S) ranks 10th of 21 in 0–100 km/h, 1.3 s off the reference Porsche Cayenne Turbo S (4.4 s).
Top speed: 258 km/h (10th of 21 in Top speed)
Top speed of 258 km/h. The segment reference reaches 282 km/h.
Go beyond this analysis
Recalculate everything for your own profile with the three physics simulators that power this page.
Running cost for your profile
Adjust mileage, driving mix and charging type to estimate your annual energy budget.
Launch simulator →Long-distance trip
Simulate any motorway trip: time, charging stops, total cost.
Simulate a trip →Chronos & accélération
0-100, 0-200, courbe de vitesse, positionnement segment.
Voir la performance →Duel against a rival
Calibrated drag race, speed stages, comparative technical analysis.
Start a duel →Segment positioning
Where the Cayenne S (8-speed Tiptronic S) stands against E-SUV
Comparison across 21 E-SUV marketed between 2010–2014.
0–100 km/h
10eout of 21
Top speed
10eout of 21
Power-to-weight
8eout of 21
Direct rivals (same segment, same energy)
ActiveHybrid X6
485 hp · 0-100 5.6 s
X5 xDrive40i
340 hp · 0-100 5.5 s
Q7 SUV
340 hp · 0-100 5.6 s
Q7 SUV
340 hp · 0-100 5.6 s
Cross-energy alternatives
Same needs, different powertrain.
Compare
Popular duels involving the Cayenne S (8-speed Tiptronic S)
Take the next step
Find a Cayenne S (8-speed Tiptronic S) or value yours
Caralogy receives no commission on these external links.
Frequently asked questions
Porsche Cayenne S (8-speed Tiptronic S): what you need to know
Well-argued answers to the most asked questions about this model, based on Caralogy data and simulations.
Among the 21 E-SUV 2010–2014, the Cayenne S (8-speed Tiptronic S) ranks 10th of 21 in 0–100 km/h (5.7 s, behind the Porsche Cayenne Turbo S), 10th of 21 in Top speed (258 km/h, behind the Porsche Cayenne Turbo S), 8th of 21 in Power-to-weight (203 hp/t, behind the Porsche Cayenne Turbo S).
Running costs depend on your profile (mileage, charging type, city/highway mix). Use the Caralogy consumption simulator for a personalised estimate.
The Porsche Cayenne Turbo S leads in 0–100 km/h (4.4 s vs 5.7 s). The choice depends on your priorities: check the Cayenne S (8-speed Tiptronic S) vs Porsche Cayenne Turbo S duel for a detailed comparison.
Caralogy does not reproduce manufacturer figures: we recalculate every number through physics simulation, starting from SCx, mass and the power curve. This is why our figures at 130 km/h differ from WLTP. Full methodology on the dedicated page.