Among the 22 compacts 2017–2021, the Megane 4 RS Trophy-R ranks 21th of 22 in 0–100 km/h (5.4 s, behind the Bmw M140i xDrive), 2nd of 22 in Top speed (260 km/h, behind the Renault Megane 4 RS Trophy 300), 3rd of 22 in Power-to-weight (230 hp/t, behind the Bmw M2 Competition).
Megane 4 RS Trophy-R
300 hp, 5,4 s 0-100 : among the 22 compacts 2017–2021, the Megane 4 RS Trophy-R ranks 21th of 22 in 0–100 km/h, 2nd of 22 in Top speed, 3rd of 22 in Power-to-weight. Here is what the Caralogy simulations say.
Power
300hp
400 Nm
0 → 100 km/h
5.4s
VMax 260 km/h
Cons.
9.5L
/100 km
Tank
50L
Full specifications Renault Megane 4 RS Trophy-R
Manufacturer data. Consumption and range estimated from the WLTP cycle; performance simulated by the Caralogy physics engine.
Powertrain
| Architecture | Inline · 4 cyl. · Turbo |
| Displacement | 2 cm³ |
| Power | 300 hp |
| Couple | 400 Nm |
| Gearbox | Manuelle 6 rapports Manuelle |
| Transmission | Traction |
Consumption
| Cons. WLTP | 9.5 L/100km |
| Tank | 50 L |
Performance
| 0 → 100 km/h | 5,4 s |
| VMax | 260 km/h |
Dimensions and environment
| Length | 4,359 mm |
| Wheelbase | 2,669 mm |
| Width | 1,873 mm |
| Height | 1,437 mm |
| Kerb weight | 1,306 kg |
| Cd | 0.29 |
Caralogy Methodology
Performance (0-100, top speed) simulated by the Caralogy physics engine (SCx, Crr, real torque curves). Motorway consumption values estimated from the manufacturer WLTP cycle.
See full methodology →Manufacturer data · WLTP-estimated consumption · Caralogy-simulated performance
Among the 22 compacts, the Megane 4 RS Trophy-R ranks (in the bottom third) in acceleration. Caralogy simulates its real-world performance: motorway simulation, performance simulation and consumption simulation.
Tailored to this vehicle?
Demanding drivers: 2nd of 22 in Top speed (260 km/h), 3rd of 22 in Power-to-weight (230 hp/t). 2nd of 22 in Top speed (260 km/h), 3rd of 22 in Power-to-weight (230 hp/t).
Frequent urban trips with stop-and-go. At 9,5 L/100 km on the combined cycle, consumption rises in the city without electric assistance. An HEV or PHEV would be more economical for this use profile.
If the priority is 0–100 km/h, the Bmw M140i xDrive (1st with 4.4 s) takes the lead. If the priority is Top speed, the Renault Megane 4 RS Trophy 300 (1st with 260 km/h) takes the lead.
Acceleration: 5.4 s 0-100 (21th of 22 in 0–100 km/h)
In pure acceleration, the Megane 4 RS Trophy-R ranks 21th of 22 in 0–100 km/h, 1.0 s off the reference Bmw M140i xDrive (4.4 s).
Top speed: 260 km/h (2nd of 22 in Top speed)
Top speed of 260 km/h. The segment reference reaches 260 km/h.
Recalculate everything for your own profile with the three physics simulators that power this page.
Running cost for your profile
Adjust mileage, driving mix and charging type to estimate your annual energy budget.
Launch simulator →Long-distance trip
Simulate any motorway trip: time, charging stops, total cost.
Simulate a trip →Chronos & accélération
0-100, 0-200, courbe de vitesse, positionnement segment.
Voir la performance →Where the Megane 4 RS Trophy-R stands against compacts
Comparison across 22 compacts marketed between 2017–2021.
Direct rivals (same segment, same energy)
Cross-energy alternatives
Same needs, different powertrain.
The full Renault Megane IV range
Generation IV launched in 2016. Available versions sorted by energy.
Other versions of the IV
Popular duels involving the Megane 4 RS Trophy-R
Renault Megane 4 RS Trophy-R: what you need to know
Well-argued answers to the most asked questions about this model, based on Caralogy data and simulations.
Running costs depend on your profile (mileage, charging type, city/highway mix). Use the Caralogy consumption simulator for a personalised estimate.
The Bmw M140i xDrive leads in 0–100 km/h (4.4 s vs 5.4 s). The choice depends on your priorities: check the Megane 4 RS Trophy-R vs Bmw M140i xDrive duel for a detailed comparison.
Caralogy does not reproduce manufacturer figures: we recalculate every number through physics simulation, starting from SCx, mass and the power curve. This is why our figures at 130 km/h differ from WLTP. Full methodology on the dedicated page.