Renault Megane 4 RS Trophy 300

PetrolcompactGENERATION IV, 2019

300 hp, 5,4 s 0-100 : among the 22 compacts 2017–2021, the Megane 4 RS Trophy 300 ranks 20th of 22 in 0–100 km/h, 1st of 22 in Top speed, 11th of 22 in Power-to-weight. Here is what the Caralogy simulations say.

Power
300 hp
420 Nm
0 → 100 km/h
5.4 s
VMax 260 km/h
Cons.
8.4 L
/100 km
Tank
50 L

Full specifications

Manufacturer data. Consumption and range estimated from the WLTP cycle; performance simulated by the Caralogy physics engine.

Powertrain

Architecture
Inline · 4 cyl. · Turbo
Displacement
2 cm³
Power
300 hp
Couple
420 Nm
Gearbox
Double embrayage 6 rapports Automatique
Transmission
Traction

Consumption

Cons. WLTP
8.4 L/100 km
Tank
50 L

Performance

0 → 100 km/h
5,4 s
VMax
260 km/h

Dimensions and environment

Length
4,359 mm
Wheelbase
2,669 mm
Width
1,873 mm
Height
1,437 mm
Kerb weight
1,450 kg
Cd
0.29

Caralogy Methodology

Performance (0-100, top speed) simulated by the Caralogy physics engine (SCx, Crr, real torque curves). Motorway consumption values estimated from the manufacturer WLTP cycle.

See full methodology

Manufacturer data · WLTP-estimated consumption · Caralogy-simulated performance

Among the 22 compacts, the Megane 4 RS Trophy 300 ranks (in the bottom third) in acceleration. Caralogy simulates its real-world performance: motorway simulation, performance simulation and consumption simulation.

Tailored to this vehicle?

Caralogy Verdict
Suitable for

Demanding drivers: 1st of 22 in Top speed (260 km/h). 1st of 22 in Top speed (260 km/h).

Less suitable for

Frequent urban trips with stop-and-go. At 8,4 L/100 km on the combined cycle, consumption rises in the city without electric assistance. An HEV or PHEV would be more economical for this use profile.

Alternatives to consider

If the priority is 0–100 km/h, the BMW M140i xDrive (1st with 4.4 s) takes the lead. If the priority is Power-to-weight, the BMW M2 Competition (1st with 265 hp/t) takes the lead.

Acceleration: 5.4 s 0-100 (20th of 22 in 0–100 km/h)

In pure acceleration, the Megane 4 RS Trophy 300 ranks 20th of 22 in 0–100 km/h, 1.0 s off the reference BMW M140i xDrive (4.4 s).

Top speed: 260 km/h (1st of 22 in Top speed)

Top speed of 260 km/h. The segment reference reaches 260 km/h.

Where the Megane 4 RS Trophy 300 stands against compacts

Comparison across 22 compacts marketed between 2017–2021.
0–100 km/h20e / 22
5,4 s
Min 5,6 s · Volkswagen Golf 8 GTI ClubsportMax 4,4 s · BMW M140i xDrive
Top speed1e / 22
260 km/h
Min 250 km/h · BMW M240iMax 260 km/h · Renault Megane 4 RS Trophy 300
Power-to-weight11e / 22
207 hp/t
Min 195 hp/t · BMW M235i xDriveMax 265 hp/t · BMW M2 Competition

Direct rivals (same segment, same energy)

Cross-energy alternatives

Same needs, different powertrain.

The full Renault Megane IV range

Generation IV launched in 2016. Available versions sorted by energy.

Other versions of the IV

Popular duels involving the Megane 4 RS Trophy 300

Continue with the Renault Megane 4 RS Trophy 300

The same car, from other angles.

Renault Megane 4 RS Trophy 300: what you need to know

Well-argued answers to the most asked questions about this model, based on Caralogy data and simulations.

Where does the Megane 4 RS Trophy 300 rank in its segment?

Among the 22 compacts 2017–2021, the Megane 4 RS Trophy 300 ranks 20th of 22 in 0–100 km/h (5.4 s, behind the BMW M140i xDrive), 1st of 22 in Top speed (260 km/h, behind the Renault Megane 4 RS Trophy 300), 11th of 22 in Power-to-weight (207 hp/t, behind the BMW M2 Competition).

How much does the Megane 4 RS Trophy 300 cost to run?

Running costs depend on your profile (mileage, charging type, city/highway mix). Use the Caralogy consumption simulator for a personalised estimate.

Why not a BMW M140i xDrive instead?

The BMW M140i xDrive leads in 0–100 km/h (4.4 s vs 5.4 s). The choice depends on your priorities: check the Megane 4 RS Trophy 300 vs BMW M140i xDrive duel for a detailed comparison.

How does Caralogy calculate its figures?

Caralogy does not reproduce manufacturer figures: we recalculate every number through physics simulation, starting from SCx, mass and the power curve. This is why our figures at 130 km/h differ from WLTP. Full methodology on the dedicated page.