SEAT Leon 1.5 TSI 150 7DSG
150 hp, 8,4 s 0-100 : among the 92 compacts 2020–2024, the Leon 1.5 TSI 150 7DSG ranks 33th of 88 in Combined consumption, 32th of 84 in Tank range, 48th of 92 in 0–100 km/h. Here is what the Caralogy simulations say.
- Power
- 150 hp
- 250 Nm
- 0 → 100 km/h
- 8.4 s
- VMax 224 km/h
- Cons.
- 5.4 L
- /100 km
- Tank
- 50 L
Full specifications
Manufacturer data. Consumption and range estimated from the WLTP cycle; performance simulated by the Caralogy physics engine.
Powertrain
- Architecture
- 4 cyl.
- Displacement
- 1,498 cm³
- Power
- 150 hp
- Couple
- 250 Nm
- Gearbox
- Double embrayage 7 rapports Automatique
Consumption
- Cons. WLTP
- 5.4 L/100 km
- Tank
- 50 L
Performance
- 0 → 100 km/h
- 8,4 s
- VMax
- 224 km/h
Dimensions and environment
- Kerb weight
- 1,280 kg
- Cd
- 0.27
- CO₂ WLTP
- 123 g/km
Caralogy Methodology
Performance (0-100, top speed) simulated by the Caralogy physics engine (SCx, Crr, real torque curves). Motorway consumption values estimated from the manufacturer WLTP cycle.
See full methodologyManufacturer data · WLTP-estimated consumption · Caralogy-simulated performance
Among the 92 compacts, the Leon 1.5 TSI 150 7DSG ranks (mid-table) in fuel consumption. Caralogy simulates its real-world cost: motorway simulation, consumption simulation and performance simulation.
Tailored to this vehicle?
Good compromise for regular use without available charging infrastructure.
If the priority is Combined consumption, the BMW 216d Steptronic (1st with 3.9 L/100) takes the lead. If the priority is Tank range, the BMW 216d Steptronic (1st with 1308 km) takes the lead.
Fuel consumption: 5.4 L/100 L/100 (33th of 88 in Combined consumption)
The Leon 1.5 TSI 150 7DSG consumes 5.4 L/100 on the WLTP combined cycle. The segment reference is the BMW 216d Steptronic (3.9 L/100).
Tank range: 926 km (32th of 84 in Tank range)
On a full tank, the Leon 1.5 TSI 150 7DSG covers 926 km on the combined cycle. The segment reference reaches 1308 km.
Go beyond this analysis
Recalculate everything for your own profile with the three physics simulators that power this page.
Running cost for your profile
Adjust mileage, driving mix and charging type to estimate your annual energy budget.
Launch simulatorLong-distance trip
Simulate any motorway trip: time, charging stops, total cost.
Simulate a tripTimes & acceleration
0-100, 0-200, speed curve, segment position.
See the performanceWhere the Leon 1.5 TSI 150 7DSG stands against compacts
Direct rivals (same segment, same energy)
Cross-energy alternatives
Same needs, different powertrain.
The full SEAT Leon IV range
Generation IV launched in 2020. Available versions sorted by energy.
Other versions of the IV
Popular duels involving the Leon 1.5 TSI 150 7DSG
Continue with the SEAT Leon 1.5 TSI 150 7DSG
The same car, from other angles.
SEAT Leon 1.5 TSI 150 7DSG: what you need to know
Well-argued answers to the most asked questions about this model, based on Caralogy data and simulations.
Where does the Leon 1.5 TSI 150 7DSG rank in its segment?
Among the 92 compacts 2020–2024, the Leon 1.5 TSI 150 7DSG ranks 33th of 88 in Combined consumption (5.4 L/100, behind the BMW 216d Steptronic), 32th of 84 in Tank range (926 km, behind the BMW 216d Steptronic), 48th of 92 in 0–100 km/h (8.4 s, behind the BMW M2).
What is the range of the Leon 1.5 TSI 150 7DSG?
926 km on a full tank (5.4 L/100 on the combined cycle) - 32th of 84 in Tank range.
How much does the Leon 1.5 TSI 150 7DSG cost to run?
Running costs depend on your profile (mileage, charging type, city/highway mix). Use the Caralogy consumption simulator for a personalised estimate.
Why not a BMW 216d Steptronic instead?
The BMW 216d Steptronic leads in Combined consumption (3.9 L/100 vs 5.4 L/100). The choice depends on your priorities: check the Leon 1.5 TSI 150 7DSG vs BMW 216d Steptronic duel for a detailed comparison.
How does Caralogy calculate its figures?
Caralogy does not reproduce manufacturer figures: we recalculate every number through physics simulation, starting from SCx, mass and the power curve. This is why our figures at 130 km/h differ from WLTP. Full methodology on the dedicated page.