G30 · GENERATION 2018 · GRAND TOURER
BMWICE

540i xDrive

340 hp, 4,8 s 0-100 : among the 32 grand tourers 2016–2020, the 540i xDrive ranks 15th of 32 in 0–100 km/h, 4th of 32 in Top speed, 11th of 32 in Power-to-weight. Here is what the Caralogy simulations say.

Energy cost · estimate2,39415,000 km · UK mix · home 0,21 £/kWhConsumption →

Power

340hp

450 Nm

0 → 100 km/h

4.8s

VMax 250 km/h

Cons.

7.9L

/100 km

Tank

68L

Technical identity card

Full specifications BMW 540i xDrive

Manufacturer data. Consumption and range estimated from the WLTP cycle; performance simulated by the Caralogy physics engine.

Powertrain

Architecture6 cyl.
Displacement2,998 cm³
Power340 hp
Couple450 Nm
GearboxConvertisseur de couple 8 rapports Automatique
TransmissionIntegrale (AWD)

Consumption

Cons. WLTP7.9 L/100km
Tank68 L

Performance

0 → 100 km/h4,8 s
VMax250 km/h

Dimensions and environment

Length4,936 mm
Wheelbase2,975 mm
Width1,868 mm
Height1,479 mm
Boot530 L
Kerb weight1,660 kg
Cd0.25
CO₂ WLTP179 g/km

Caralogy Methodology

Performance (0-100, top speed) simulated by the Caralogy physics engine (SCx, Crr, real torque curves). Motorway consumption values estimated from the manufacturer WLTP cycle.

See full methodology →

Manufacturer data · WLTP-estimated consumption · Caralogy-simulated performance

Among the 32 grand tourers, the 540i xDrive ranks (mid-table) in acceleration. Caralogy simulates its real-world performance: motorway simulation, performance simulation and consumption simulation.

Caralogy Analysis

Tailored to this vehicle?

Caralogy Verdict
Suitable for

Demanding drivers: 4th of 32 in Top speed (250 km/h), 11th of 32 in Power-to-weight (205 hp/t). 4th of 32 in Top speed (250 km/h), 11th of 32 in Power-to-weight (205 hp/t).

Less suitable for

Frequent urban trips with stop-and-go. At 7,9 L/100 km on the combined cycle, consumption rises in the city without electric assistance. An HEV or PHEV would be more economical for this use profile.

Alternatives to consider

If the priority is 0–100 km/h, the Bmw M5 Competition (1st with 3.3 s) takes the lead. If the priority is Top speed, the Bmw 540i xDrive (1st with 250 km/h) takes the lead.

Acceleration: 4.8 s 0-100 (15th of 32 in 0–100 km/h)

In pure acceleration, the 540i xDrive ranks 15th of 32 in 0–100 km/h, 1.5 s off the reference Bmw M5 Competition (3.3 s).

Top speed: 250 km/h (4th of 32 in Top speed)

Top speed of 250 km/h. The segment reference reaches 250 km/h.

Segment positioning

Where the 540i xDrive stands against grand tourers

Comparison across 32 grand tourers marketed between 2016–2020.

0–100 km/h15e / 32
4,8 s
Min 5,4 s · Bmw 640i Gran TurismoMax 3,3 s · Bmw M5 Competition
Top speed4e / 32
250 km/h
Min 250 km/h · Bmw M550i xDriveMax 250 km/h · Bmw 540i xDrive
Power-to-weight11e / 32
205 hp/t
Min 165 hp/t · Bmw 640d xDrive Gran TurismoMax 335 hp/t · Bmw M5 Competition

Direct rivals (same segment, same energy)

Cross-energy alternatives

Same needs, different powertrain.

Model family

The full BMW 5 Series G30 range

Generation G30 launched in 2017. Available versions sorted by energy.

Other versions of the G30

Compare

Popular duels involving the 540i xDrive

Frequently asked questions

BMW 540i xDrive: what you need to know

Well-argued answers to the most asked questions about this model, based on Caralogy data and simulations.

Among the 32 grand tourers 2016–2020, the 540i xDrive ranks 15th of 32 in 0–100 km/h (4.8 s, behind the Bmw M5 Competition), 4th of 32 in Top speed (250 km/h, behind the Bmw 540i xDrive), 11th of 32 in Power-to-weight (205 hp/t, behind the Bmw M5 Competition).

Running costs depend on your profile (mileage, charging type, city/highway mix). Use the Caralogy consumption simulator for a personalised estimate.

The Bmw M5 Competition leads in 0–100 km/h (3.3 s vs 4.8 s). The choice depends on your priorities: check the 540i xDrive vs Bmw M5 Competition duel for a detailed comparison.

Caralogy does not reproduce manufacturer figures: we recalculate every number through physics simulation, starting from SCx, mass and the power curve. This is why our figures at 130 km/h differ from WLTP. Full methodology on the dedicated page.