G30 · GENERATION 2018 · GRAND TOURER
BMWICE

M550d xDrive

400 hp, 4,4 s 0-100 : among the 32 grand tourers 2016–2020, the M550d xDrive ranks 8th of 32 in 0–100 km/h, 26th of 32 in Top speed, 8th of 32 in Power-to-weight, behind the only Bmw M5 Competition. Here is what the Caralogy simulations say.

Energy cost · estimate2,10215,000 km · UK mix · home 0,21 £/kWhConsumption →

Power

400hp

760 Nm

0 → 100 km/h

4.4s

VMax 250 km/h

Cons.

6.4L

/100 km

Tank

66L

Technical identity card

Full specifications BMW M550d xDrive

Manufacturer data. Consumption and range estimated from the WLTP cycle; performance simulated by the Caralogy physics engine.

Powertrain

Architecture6 cyl.
Displacement2,993 cm³
Power400 hp
Couple760 Nm
GearboxConvertisseur de couple 8 rapports Automatique
TransmissionIntegrale (AWD)

Consumption

Cons. WLTP6.4 L/100km
Tank66 L

Performance

0 → 100 km/h4,4 s
VMax250 km/h

Dimensions and environment

Length4,962 mm
Wheelbase2,975 mm
Width1,868 mm
Height1,467 mm
Boot530 L
Kerb weight1,860 kg
Cd0.26
CO₂ WLTP168 g/km

Caralogy Methodology

Performance (0-100, top speed) simulated by the Caralogy physics engine (SCx, Crr, real torque curves). Motorway consumption values estimated from the manufacturer WLTP cycle.

See full methodology →

Manufacturer data · WLTP-estimated consumption · Caralogy-simulated performance

Among the 32 grand tourers, the M550d xDrive ranks (top 8 in segment) in acceleration. Caralogy simulates its real-world performance: motorway simulation, performance simulation and consumption simulation.

Caralogy Analysis

Tailored to this vehicle?

Caralogy Verdict
Suitable for

Demanding drivers: 8th of 32 in 0–100 km/h (4.4 s), 8th of 32 in Power-to-weight (215 hp/t). 8th of 32 in 0–100 km/h (4.4 s), 8th of 32 in Power-to-weight (215 hp/t).

Less suitable for

Regular family use with bulky luggage. The space and boot are sport-calibrated, not utility. A sedan or SUV from the same manufacturer would be more practical daily.

Alternatives to consider

If the priority is 0–100 km/h, the Bmw M5 Competition (1st with 3.3 s) takes the lead. If the priority is Top speed, the Bmw M5 Competition (1st with 250 km/h) takes the lead.

Acceleration: 4.4 s 0-100 (8th of 32 in 0–100 km/h)

In pure acceleration, the M550d xDrive ranks 8th of 32 in 0–100 km/h, 1.1 s off the reference Bmw M5 Competition (3.3 s).

Top speed: 250 km/h (26th of 32 in Top speed)

Top speed of 250 km/h. The segment reference reaches 250 km/h.

Segment positioning

Where the M550d xDrive stands against grand tourers

Comparison across 32 grand tourers marketed between 2016–2020.

0–100 km/h8e / 32
4,4 s
Min 5,4 s · Bmw 640i Gran TurismoMax 3,3 s · Bmw M5 Competition
Top speed26e / 32
250 km/h
Min 250 km/h · Bmw 640d xDrive Gran TurismoMax 250 km/h · Bmw M5 Competition
Power-to-weight8e / 32
215 hp/t
Min 165 hp/t · Bmw 640d xDrive Gran TurismoMax 335 hp/t · Bmw M5 Competition

Direct rivals (same segment, same energy)

Cross-energy alternatives

Same needs, different powertrain.

Model family

The full BMW 5 Series G30 range

Generation G30 launched in 2017. Available versions sorted by energy.

Other versions of the G30

Compare

Popular duels involving the M550d xDrive

Frequently asked questions

BMW M550d xDrive: what you need to know

Well-argued answers to the most asked questions about this model, based on Caralogy data and simulations.

Among the 32 grand tourers 2016–2020, the M550d xDrive ranks 8th of 32 in 0–100 km/h (4.4 s, behind the Bmw M5 Competition), 26th of 32 in Top speed (250 km/h, behind the Bmw M5 Competition), 8th of 32 in Power-to-weight (215 hp/t, behind the Bmw M5 Competition).

Running costs depend on your profile (mileage, charging type, city/highway mix). Use the Caralogy consumption simulator for a personalised estimate.

The Bmw M5 Competition leads in 0–100 km/h (3.3 s vs 4.4 s). The choice depends on your priorities: check the M550d xDrive vs Bmw M5 Competition duel for a detailed comparison.

Caralogy does not reproduce manufacturer figures: we recalculate every number through physics simulation, starting from SCx, mass and the power curve. This is why our figures at 130 km/h differ from WLTP. Full methodology on the dedicated page.