Among the 93 grand tourers 2016–2020, the 630i Gran Turismo ranks 70th of 93 in Combined consumption (6.7 L/100, behind the Bmw 520d), 67th of 91 in Tank range (1015 km, behind the Bmw 520d), 56th of 93 in 0–100 km/h (6.3 s, behind the Bmw M5 Competition).
G32 · GENERATION 2018 → · GRAND TOURER
BMWICE
630i Gran Turismo
258 hp, 6,3 s 0-100 : among the 93 grand tourers 2016–2020, the 630i Gran Turismo ranks 70th of 93 in Combined consumption, 67th of 91 in Tank range, 56th of 93 in 0–100 km/h. Here is what the Caralogy simulations say.
Power
258hp
400 Nm
0 → 100 km/h
6.3s
VMax 250 km/h
Cons.
6.7L
/100 km
Tank
68L
Technical identity card
Full specifications BMW 630i Gran Turismo
Manufacturer data and values calibrated by the Caralogy simulation engine.
Powertrain
| Architecture | 4 cyl. |
| Displacement | 1,998 cm³ |
| Power | 258 hp |
| Couple | 400 Nm |
| Gearbox | Convertisseur de couple 8 rapports Automatique |
Consumption
| Cons. WLTP | 6.7 L/100km |
| Tank | 68 L |
Performance
| 0 → 100 km/h | 6,3 s |
| VMax | 250 km/h |
Dimensions and environment
| Length | 5,091 mm |
| Wheelbase | 3,070 mm |
| Width | 1,902 mm |
| Height | 1,538 mm |
| Boot | 610 L |
| Kerb weight | 1,720 kg |
| Cd | 0.26 |
| CO₂ WLTP | 153 g/km |
Caralogy Methodology
Motorway and performance values calibrated by the Caralogy physics simulation engine (SCx, Crr, real torque curves).
See full methodology →Manufacturer data · motorway values calibrated by the Caralogy engine
Among the 93 grand tourers, the 630i Gran Turismo ranks (in the bottom third) in fuel consumption. Caralogy simulates its real-world cost: motorway simulation, consumption simulation and performance simulation.
Caralogy Analysis
Tailored to this vehicle?
Fuel consumption: 6.7 L/100 L/100 (70th of 93 in Combined consumption)
The 630i Gran Turismo consumes 6.7 L/100 on the WLTP combined cycle. The segment reference is the Bmw 520d (4.3 L/100).
Tank range: 1015 km (67th of 91 in Tank range)
On a full tank, the 630i Gran Turismo covers 1015 km on the combined cycle. The segment reference reaches 1535 km.
Go beyond this analysis
Recalculate everything for your own profile with the three physics simulators that power this page.
Running cost for your profile
Adjust mileage, driving mix and charging type to estimate your annual energy budget.
Launch simulator →Long-distance trip
Simulate any motorway trip: time, charging stops, total cost.
Simulate a trip →Chronos & accélération
0-100, 0-200, courbe de vitesse, positionnement segment.
Voir la performance →Segment positioning
Where the 630i Gran Turismo stands against grand tourers
Comparison across 93 grand tourers marketed between 2016–2020.
Combined consumption70e / 93
6.7 L/100
Min 10.8 L/100 · Bmw M5Max 4.3 L/100 · Bmw 520d
Tank range67e / 91
1 015 km
Min 630 km · Bmw M5Max 1 535 km · Bmw 520d
0–100 km/h56e / 93
6,3 s
Min 8,2 s · Bmw 520iMax 3,3 s · Bmw M5 Competition
Direct rivals (same segment, same energy)
S90 B5 AWD250 hp · 0-100 6.6 s
V90 B5 AWD250 hp · 0-100 6.7 s
A6 45 TFSI245 hp · 0-100 6.4 s
A6 Avant TFSI S tronic 150 kW204 hp · 0-100 8.3 s
Cross-energy alternatives
Same needs, different powertrain.
Model family
The full BMW 6 Series G32 range
Generation G32 launched in 2017. Available versions sorted by energy.
Other versions of the G32
Compare
Popular duels involving the 630i Gran Turismo
Frequently asked questions
BMW 630i Gran Turismo: what you need to know
Well-argued answers to the most asked questions about this model, based on Caralogy data and simulations.
1015 km on a full tank (6.7 L/100 on the combined cycle) — 67th of 91 in autonomie du segment.
Running costs depend on your profile (mileage, charging type, city/highway mix). Use the Caralogy consumption simulator for a personalised estimate.
The Bmw 520d leads in Combined consumption (4.3 L/100 vs 6.7 L/100). The choice depends on your priorities: check the 630i Gran Turismo vs Bmw 520d duel for a detailed comparison.
Caralogy does not reproduce manufacturer figures: we recalculate every number through physics simulation, starting from SCx, mass and the power curve. This is why our figures at 130 km/h differ from WLTP. Full methodology on the dedicated page.