BMW X3 M40i

Petrolfamily SUVGENERATION G01, 2018

354 hp, 4,8 s 0-100 : among the 12 D-SUV 2016–2020, the X3 M40i ranks 4th of 12 in 0–100 km/h, 8th of 12 in Top speed, 4th of 12 in Power-to-weight, behind the only Alfa Romeo Stelvio Quadrifoglio. Here is what the Caralogy simulations say.

Power
354 hp
500 Nm
0 → 100 km/h
4.8 s
VMax 250 km/h
Cons.
9.1 L
/100 km
Tank
65 L

Full specifications

Manufacturer data. Consumption and range estimated from the WLTP cycle; performance simulated by the Caralogy physics engine.

Powertrain

Architecture
6 cyl.
Displacement
2,998 cm³
Power
354 hp
Couple
500 Nm
Gearbox
Convertisseur de couple 8 rapports Automatique
Transmission
Integrale (AWD)

Consumption

Cons. WLTP
9.1 L/100 km
Tank
65 L

Performance

0 → 100 km/h
4,8 s
VMax
250 km/h

Dimensions and environment

Length
4,716 mm
Wheelbase
2,864 mm
Width
1,897 mm
Height
1,676 mm
Boot
550 L
Kerb weight
1,810 kg
Cd
0.33
CO₂ WLTP
207 g/km

Caralogy Methodology

Performance (0-100, top speed) simulated by the Caralogy physics engine (SCx, Crr, real torque curves). Motorway consumption values estimated from the manufacturer WLTP cycle.

See full methodology

Manufacturer data · WLTP-estimated consumption · Caralogy-simulated performance

Among the 12 D-SUV, the X3 M40i ranks (top 4 in segment) in acceleration. Caralogy simulates its real-world performance: motorway simulation, performance simulation and consumption simulation.

Tailored to this vehicle?

Caralogy Verdict
Suitable for

Demanding drivers: 4th of 12 in 0–100 km/h (4.8 s), 4th of 12 in Power-to-weight (196 hp/t). 4th of 12 in 0–100 km/h (4.8 s), 4th of 12 in Power-to-weight (196 hp/t).

Less suitable for

Frequent urban trips with stop-and-go. At 9,1 L/100 km on the combined cycle, consumption rises in the city without electric assistance. An HEV or PHEV would be more economical for this use profile.

Alternatives to consider

If the priority is 0–100 km/h, the Alfa Romeo Stelvio Quadrifoglio (1st with 3.8 s) takes the lead. If the priority is Top speed, the Alfa Romeo Stelvio Quadrifoglio (1st with 283 km/h) takes the lead.

Acceleration: 4.8 s 0-100 (4th of 12 in 0–100 km/h)

In pure acceleration, the X3 M40i ranks 4th of 12 in 0–100 km/h, 1.0 s off the reference Alfa Romeo Stelvio Quadrifoglio (3.8 s).

Top speed: 250 km/h (8th of 12 in Top speed)

Top speed of 250 km/h. The segment reference reaches 283 km/h.

Where the X3 M40i stands against D-SUV

Comparison across 12 D-SUV marketed between 2016–2020.
0–100 km/h4e / 12
4,8 s
Min 5,3 s · Porsche Macan SMax 3,8 s · Alfa Romeo Stelvio Quadrifoglio
Top speed8e / 12
250 km/h
Min 250 km/h · BMW X3 M40dMax 283 km/h · Alfa Romeo Stelvio Quadrifoglio
Power-to-weight4e / 12
196 hp/t
Min 172 hp/t · BMW X3 M40dMax 279 hp/t · Alfa Romeo Stelvio Quadrifoglio

Direct rivals (same segment, same energy)

Cross-energy alternatives

Same needs, different powertrain.

The full BMW X3 G01 range

Generation G01 launched in 2018. Available versions sorted by energy.

Other versions of the G01

Popular duels involving the X3 M40i

Continue with the BMW X3 M40i

The same car, from other angles.

BMW X3 M40i: what you need to know

Well-argued answers to the most asked questions about this model, based on Caralogy data and simulations.

Where does the X3 M40i rank in its segment?

Among the 12 D-SUV 2016–2020, the X3 M40i ranks 4th of 12 in 0–100 km/h (4.8 s, behind the Alfa Romeo Stelvio Quadrifoglio), 8th of 12 in Top speed (250 km/h, behind the Alfa Romeo Stelvio Quadrifoglio), 4th of 12 in Power-to-weight (196 hp/t, behind the Alfa Romeo Stelvio Quadrifoglio).

How much does the X3 M40i cost to run?

Running costs depend on your profile (mileage, charging type, city/highway mix). Use the Caralogy consumption simulator for a personalised estimate.

Why not a Alfa Romeo Stelvio Quadrifoglio instead?

The Alfa Romeo Stelvio Quadrifoglio leads in 0–100 km/h (3.8 s vs 4.8 s). The choice depends on your priorities: check the X3 M40i vs Alfa Romeo Stelvio Quadrifoglio duel for a detailed comparison.

How does Caralogy calculate its figures?

Caralogy does not reproduce manufacturer figures: we recalculate every number through physics simulation, starting from SCx, mass and the power curve. This is why our figures at 130 km/h differ from WLTP. Full methodology on the dedicated page.