Among the 2 C-SUV 2007–2011, the X1 sDrive20d ranks Combined consumption (5.3 L/100, behind the Bmw X1 sDrive18d), Tank range (1151 km, behind the Bmw X1 sDrive18d), 0–100 km/h (8.1 s, behind the Bmw X1 sDrive20d).
E84 · GENERATION 2009 → · COMPACT SUV
BMWICE
X1 sDrive20d
177 hp, 8,1 s 0-100 : among the 2 C-SUV 2007–2011, the X1 sDrive20d ranks Combined consumption, Tank range, 0–100 km/h. Here is what the Caralogy simulations say.
Power
177hp
350 Nm
0 → 100 km/h
8.1s
VMax 205 km/h
Cons.
5.3L
/100 km
Tank
61L
Technical identity card
Full specifications BMW X1 sDrive20d
Manufacturer data. Consumption and range estimated from the WLTP cycle; performance simulated by the Caralogy physics engine.
Powertrain
| Displacement | 1,995 cm³ |
| Power | 177 hp |
| Couple | 350 Nm |
| Gearbox | Manuelle 6 rapports Manuelle |
Consumption
| Cons. WLTP | 5.3 L/100km |
| Tank | 61 L |
Performance
| 0 → 100 km/h | 8,1 s |
| VMax | 205 km/h |
Dimensions and environment
| Length | 4,454 mm |
| Wheelbase | 2,760 mm |
| Width | 1,798 mm |
| Height | 1,545 mm |
| Boot | 420 L |
| Kerb weight | 1,490 kg |
| Cd | 0.32 |
| CO₂ WLTP | 139 g/km |
Caralogy Methodology
Performance (0-100, top speed) simulated by the Caralogy physics engine (SCx, Crr, real torque curves). Motorway consumption values estimated from the manufacturer WLTP cycle.
See full methodology →Manufacturer data · WLTP-estimated consumption · Caralogy-simulated performance
Among the 2 C-SUV, the X1 sDrive20d ranks in fuel consumption. Caralogy simulates its real-world cost: motorway simulation, consumption simulation and performance simulation.
Caralogy Analysis
Tailored to this vehicle?
Caralogy Verdict
Suitable for
Good compromise for regular use without available charging infrastructure. 0–100 km/h (8.1 s).
Alternatives to consider
If the priority is Combined consumption, the Bmw X1 sDrive18d (1st with 5.2 L/100) takes the lead. If the priority is Tank range, the Bmw X1 sDrive18d (1st with 1173 km) takes the lead.
Fuel consumption: 5.3 L/100 L/100 (Combined consumption)
The X1 sDrive20d consumes 5.3 L/100 on the WLTP combined cycle. The segment reference is the Bmw X1 sDrive18d (5.2 L/100).
Tank range: 1151 km (Tank range)
On a full tank, the X1 sDrive20d covers 1151 km on the combined cycle. The segment reference reaches 1173 km.
Go beyond this analysis
Recalculate everything for your own profile with the three physics simulators that power this page.
Running cost for your profile
Adjust mileage, driving mix and charging type to estimate your annual energy budget.
Launch simulator →Long-distance trip
Simulate any motorway trip: time, charging stops, total cost.
Simulate a trip →Chronos & accélération
0-100, 0-200, courbe de vitesse, positionnement segment.
Voir la performance →Segment positioning
Where the X1 sDrive20d stands against C-SUV
Comparison across 2 C-SUV marketed between 2007–2011.
Combined consumption2e / 2
5.3 L/100
Min 5.3 L/100 · Bmw X1 sDrive20dMax 5.2 L/100 · Bmw X1 sDrive18d
Tank range2e / 2
1 151 km
Min 1 151 km · Bmw X1 sDrive20dMax 1 173 km · Bmw X1 sDrive18d
0–100 km/h1e / 2
8,1 s
Min 9,6 s · Bmw X1 sDrive18dMax 8,1 s · Bmw X1 sDrive20d
Direct rivals (same segment, same energy)
Q3 Sportback150 hp · 0-100 9.2 s
3008 BlueHDi 130 EAT8131 hp · 0-100 10.8 s
Q3 Sportback193 hp · 0-100 7.5 s
XC40 B4197 hp · 0-100 8.3 s
Cross-energy alternatives
Same needs, different powertrain.
Compare
Popular duels involving the X1 sDrive20d
Frequently asked questions
BMW X1 sDrive20d: what you need to know
Well-argued answers to the most asked questions about this model, based on Caralogy data and simulations.
1151 km on a full tank (5.3 L/100 on the combined cycle) - autonomie du segment.
Running costs depend on your profile (mileage, charging type, city/highway mix). Use the Caralogy consumption simulator for a personalised estimate.
The Bmw X1 sDrive18d leads in Combined consumption (5.2 L/100 vs 5.3 L/100). The choice depends on your priorities: check the X1 sDrive20d vs Bmw X1 sDrive18d duel for a detailed comparison.
Caralogy does not reproduce manufacturer figures: we recalculate every number through physics simulation, starting from SCx, mass and the power curve. This is why our figures at 130 km/h differ from WLTP. Full methodology on the dedicated page.