F3 · GENERATION 2026 · COMPACT SUV
AudiICE

Q3 Sportback

150 hp, 9,2 s 0-100 : among the 10 C-SUV 2024–2028, the Q3 Sportback ranks 2nd of 10 in Combined consumption, 1st of 10 in Tank range, 9th of 10 in 0–100 km/h. Here is what the Caralogy simulations say.

Energy cost · estimate1,90515,000 km · UK mix · home 0,21 £/kWhConsumption →

Power

150hp

360 Nm

0 → 100 km/h

9.2s

VMax 207 km/h

Cons.

5.8L

/100 km

Tank

55L

Technical identity card

Full specifications Audi Q3 Sportback

Manufacturer data. Consumption and range estimated from the WLTP cycle; performance simulated by the Caralogy physics engine.

Powertrain

Displacement1,968 cm³
Power150 hp
Couple360 Nm
GearboxConvertisseur de couple 7 rapports Automatique
TransmissionTraction

Consumption

Cons. WLTP5.8 L/100km
Tank55 L

Performance

0 → 100 km/h9,2 s
VMax207 km/h

Dimensions and environment

Length4,531 mm
Wheelbase2,678 mm
Width1,859 mm
Height1,546 mm
Boot488 L
Kerb weight1,625 kg
Cd0.31
CO₂ WLTP152 g/km

Caralogy Methodology

Performance (0-100, top speed) simulated by the Caralogy physics engine (SCx, Crr, real torque curves). Motorway consumption values estimated from the manufacturer WLTP cycle.

See full methodology →

Manufacturer data · WLTP-estimated consumption · Caralogy-simulated performance

Among the 10 C-SUV, the Q3 Sportback ranks (top 2 in segment) in fuel consumption. Caralogy simulates its real-world cost: motorway simulation, consumption simulation and performance simulation.

Caralogy Analysis

Tailored to this vehicle?

Caralogy Verdict
Suitable for

Good compromise for regular use without available charging infrastructure. 2nd of 10 in Combined consumption (5.8 L/100), 1st of 10 in Tank range (948 km).

Less suitable for

Some metrics lag behind the segment. Check the rankings above to identify weak points.

Alternatives to consider

If the priority is Combined consumption, the Bmw X1 sDrive20d (1st with 5.1 L/100) takes the lead. If the priority is 0–100 km/h, the Audi Q3 Sportback (1st with 5.7 s) takes the lead.

Fuel consumption: 5.8 L/100 L/100 (2nd of 10 in Combined consumption)

The Q3 Sportback consumes 5.8 L/100 on the WLTP combined cycle. The segment reference is the Bmw X1 sDrive20d (5.1 L/100).

Tank range: 948 km (1st of 10 in Tank range)

On a full tank, the Q3 Sportback covers 948 km on the combined cycle. The segment reference reaches 948 km.

Segment positioning

Where the Q3 Sportback stands against C-SUV

Comparison across 10 C-SUV marketed between 2024–2028.

Combined consumption2e / 10
5.8 L/100
Min 9 L/100 · Audi Q3 SUVMax 5.1 L/100 · Bmw X1 sDrive20d
Tank range1e / 10
948 km
Min 667 km · Audi Q3 SUVMax 948 km · Audi Q3 Sportback
0–100 km/h9e / 10
9,2 s
Min 10,2 s · Kia Sportage 1.6 T-GDi 150 FWDMax 5,7 s · Audi Q3 Sportback

Direct rivals (same segment, same energy)

Cross-energy alternatives

Same needs, different powertrain.

Model family

The full Audi Q3 F3 range

Generation F3 launched in 2018. Available versions sorted by energy.

Other versions of the F3

Compare

Popular duels involving the Q3 Sportback

Frequently asked questions

Audi Q3 Sportback: what you need to know

Well-argued answers to the most asked questions about this model, based on Caralogy data and simulations.

Among the 10 C-SUV 2024–2028, the Q3 Sportback ranks 2nd of 10 in Combined consumption (5.8 L/100, behind the Bmw X1 sDrive20d), 1st of 10 in Tank range (948 km, behind the Audi Q3 Sportback), 9th of 10 in 0–100 km/h (9.2 s, behind the Audi Q3 Sportback).

948 km on a full tank (5.8 L/100 on the combined cycle) — 1st of 10 in autonomie du segment.

Running costs depend on your profile (mileage, charging type, city/highway mix). Use the Caralogy consumption simulator for a personalised estimate.

The Bmw X1 sDrive20d leads in Combined consumption (5.1 L/100 vs 5.8 L/100). The choice depends on your priorities: check the Q3 Sportback vs Bmw X1 sDrive20d duel for a detailed comparison.

Caralogy does not reproduce manufacturer figures: we recalculate every number through physics simulation, starting from SCx, mass and the power curve. This is why our figures at 130 km/h differ from WLTP. Full methodology on the dedicated page.