Over 0–100 km/h, M3 Competition F80 wins (3,88 s vs 4,14 s).
Performance comparison
Simulated drag race 0 → 1,000 m in real time. Synchronised speed counters and stopwatch. Physics calibration on 7 manufacturer measurements.
Simulation
Calibration
Physics model calibrated on manufacturer splits. The limited top speed is not the real aerodynamic top speed of the vehicles.
| e-tron GT quattro | M3 Competition F80 | |
|---|---|---|
| 0–100 km/h | 4,14 s | 3,88 s+0,26 s |
| 400 m standing start | 12,36 s | 11,65 s+0,71 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 22,46 s | 20,92 s+1,54 s |
| Top speed (electronically limited) | 245 km/h | 250 km/h−5 km/h |
| Power-to-weight ratio | 3,95 kg/hp | 3,39 kg/hpbetter ratio |
Standing-start drag race, calibrated on manufacturer splits. The gap shows at each stage.
Simulated performance at each stage. Winner in green.
| Palier | e-tron GT quattro | M3 Competition F80 |
|---|---|---|
| 0–30 km/h | 1,13 s | 1,14 stight gap |
| 0–50 km/h | 1,88 s | 1,90 stight gap |
| 0–80 km/h | 3,08 s | 3,01 stight gap |
| 0–100 km/h | 4,14 s | 3,88 s |
| 0–120 km/h | 5,47 s | 4,84 s |
| 0–160 km/h | 9,25 s | 7,51 s |
| 0–200 km/h | 14,74 s | 11,33 s |
| 400 m standing start | 12,36 s | 11,65 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 22,46 s | 20,92 s |
| Top speed limited | 245 km/h | 250 km/h |
Manufacturer technical specifications. The power-to-weight ratio is the key physical factor in a drag race.
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 577 hp | Pending |
| Torque | 830 Nm | |
| Weight | 2 280 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Integrale (AWD) | |
| Gearbox | Unknown |
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 510 hp | Pending |
| Torque | 650 Nm | |
| Weight | 1 730 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | - | |
| Gearbox | Eight-speed M Steptronic transmission with Drivelogic |
Off the line, the Bmw M3 Competition hits 100 km/h in 3.88 s versus 4.14 s for the e-tron GT quattro. Despite lacking instant torque, 510 hp of power compensates. The 0.26 s gap is negligible: both vehicles are neck and neck.
At 200 metres, the Bmw M3 Competition is doing 163 km/h against 149 km/h for the e-tron GT quattro. The gap is 0.32 s. The gap remains stable from the start.
At 400 metres standing start, the Bmw M3 Competition crosses the line in 11.64 s versus 12.36 s. The 0.72 s gap represents roughly 36 m of track - a gap visible to the naked eye.
Past 400 metres, the Bmw M3 Competition continues to build its lead. At 600 metres, it runs at 228 km/h versus 208 km/h. At 1,000 metres, the Bmw M3 Competition finishes in 20.91 s versus 22.46 s, with a 1.54 s lead. Both vehicles have similar top speeds (245 vs 250 (i.e. 155 mph - industry threshold) km/h), preventing any comeback.
Both rivals are electronically governed, but not at the same level: the e-tron GT quattro is capped at 245 km/h, the Bmw M3 Competition at 250 (i.e. 155 mph - industry threshold) km/h. This isn’t a physical engine limit - it’s a manufacturer choice, usually for tyre safety or homologation reasons. Neither car reaches its true aerodynamic top speed.
Instant electric torque gives an advantage off the line. The higher top speed of the combustion engine gives an advantage over longer distances. The distance at which one catches the other depends on the top speed differential.
In European road use (130 km/h max), both vehicles reach the legal speed limit in under 6.28 seconds. The 0.26 s difference in 0 to 100 km/h is mostly felt in motorway merging and overtaking.
Swap one of the two models to explore an equivalent duel in the same segment.
Over 0–100 km/h, M3 Competition F80 wins (3,88 s vs 4,14 s).
e-tron GT quattro goes from 0 to 100 km/h in 4,14 seconds (calibrated simulation).
e-tron GT quattro: 577 hp, ratio 3,95 kg/hp. M3 Competition F80: 510 hp, ratio 3,39 kg/hp.
e-tron GT quattro: 245 km/h. M3 Competition F80: 250 km/h.