Sur 0–100 km/h, P7 gagne (6,58 s vs 6,77 s).
Performance comparison
Simulated drag race 0 → 1,000 m in real time. Synchronised speed counters and stopwatch. Physics calibration on 7 manufacturer measurements.
Simulation
Calibration
Physics model calibrated on manufacturer splits. The limited top speed is not the real aerodynamic top speed of the vehicles.
| Q4 45 e-tron 210 kW | P7 | |
|---|---|---|
| 0–100 km/h | 6,77 s | 6,58 s+0,19 s |
| 400 m standing start | 14,99 s | 14,81 s+0,18 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 27,44 s−0,20 s | 27,64 s |
| Top speed (electronically limited) | 180 km/h+10 km/h | 170 km/h |
| Power-to-weight ratio | 7,50 kg/hpbetter ratio | 7,59 kg/hp |
Standing-start drag race, calibrated on manufacturer splits. The gap shows at each stage.
Simulated performance at each stage. Winner in green.
| Palier | Q4 45 e-tron 210 kW | P7 |
|---|---|---|
| 0–30 km/h | 1,79 s | 1,75 stight gap |
| 0–50 km/h | 2,99 s | 2,93 stight gap |
| 0–80 km/h | 4,96 s | 4,84 stight gap |
| 0–100 km/h | 6,77 s | 6,58 s |
| 0–120 km/h | 9,11 s | 8,81 s |
| 0–160 km/h | 16,30 s | 15,66 s |
| 400 m standing start | 14,99 s | 14,81 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 27,44 s | 27,64 s |
| Top speed | 180 km/h | 170 km/h |
Manufacturer technical specifications. The power-to-weight ratio is the key physical factor in a drag race.
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 286 hp | Pending |
| Torque | 545 Nm | |
| Weight | 2 145 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Propulsion | |
| Gearbox | Unknown |
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 263 hp | Permanent Magnet Synchronous Motor |
| Torque | 390 Nm | |
| Weight | 1 995 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Propulsion | |
| Gearbox | Single-speed fixed gear |
Off the line, the P7 hits 100 km/h in 6.58 s versus 6.77 s for the Q4 45 e-tron 210 kW. At this point, the P7 leads by 0.19 s and sits roughly 2 m ahead.
At 200 metres, the P7 is doing 127 km/h against 125 km/h for the Q4 45 e-tron 210 kW. The gap is 0.11 s. The gap remains stable from the start.
At 400 metres standing start, the P7 crosses the line in 14.81 s versus 14.98 s. The 0.17 s gap represents roughly 7 m of track — barely a car length.
Past 400 metres, the situation changes. The P7 maxes out at 170 km/h while the Q4 45 e-tron 210 kW keeps accelerating towards 180 km/h. At 600 metres, the gap has dropped to 0.21 s.
Around 823 metres, both vehicles are level. This is the inversion point: the Q4 45 e-tron 210 kW overcomes its launch deficit thanks to a 10 km/h higher top speed.
At 1,000 metres, the Q4 45 e-tron 210 kW finishes in 27.43 s versus 27.64 s. The 0.21 s delta shows an extremely tight race.
Both rivals are electronically governed, but not at the same level: the Q4 45 e-tron 210 kW is capped at 180 km/h, the P7 at 170 km/h. This isn’t a physical engine limit — it’s a manufacturer choice, usually for tyre safety or homologation reasons. Neither car reaches its true aerodynamic top speed.
With two electric powertrains, the difference comes down to power-to-weight ratio (7.50 kg/hp vs 7.59 kg/hp) and transmission (Unknown vs Automatic).
In European road use (130 km/h max), both vehicles reach the legal speed limit in under 10.55 seconds. The 0.19 s difference in 0 to 100 km/h is mostly felt in motorway merging and overtaking.
Swap one of the two models to explore an equivalent duel in the same segment.
Sur 0–100 km/h, P7 gagne (6,58 s vs 6,77 s).
Q4 45 e-tron 210 kW passe de 0 à 100 km/h en 6,77 secondes (simulation calibrée).
Q4 45 e-tron 210 kW : 286 hp, ratio 7,50 kg/hp. P7 : 263 hp, ratio 7,59 kg/hp.
Q4 45 e-tron 210 kW : 180 km/h. P7 : 170 km/h.