Over 0–100 km/h, P7 wins (4,21 s vs 5,15 s).
Simulated drag race 0 → 1,000 m in real time. Synchronised speed counters and stopwatch. Physics calibration on 7 manufacturer measurements.
| Measure | Q7 SUV | P7 | Gap |
|---|---|---|---|
| 0–100 km/h | 5.15 s | 4.21 s | 0.94 s · P7 |
| 400 m standing start | 13.41 s | 12.55 s | 0.86 s · P7 |
| 1,000 m standing start | 24.35 s | 25.25 s | 0.90 s · Q7 SUV |
| Top speed (electronically limited) | 240 km/h | 170 km/h | 70 km/h · Q7 SUV |
| Power-to-weight ratio | 4.88 kg/hp | 4.81 kg/hp | better ratio · P7 |
Standing-start drag race, calibrated on manufacturer splits. The gap shows at each stage.
| Stage | Q7 SUV | P7 |
|---|---|---|
| 0–30 km/h | 1.35 s | 1.11 s |
| 0–50 km/h | 2.26 s | 1.85 s |
| 0–80 km/h | 3.77 s | 3.09 s |
| 0–100 km/h | 5.15 s | 4.21 s |
| 0–120 km/h | 6.87 s | 5.64 s |
| 0–160 km/h | 11.60 s | 9.67 s |
| 0–200 km/h | 19.18 s | - |
| 400 m standing start | 13.41 s | 12.55 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 24.35 s | 25.25 s |
| Top speed | 240 km/h | 170 km/h |
Physics model calibrated on manufacturer splits. The limited top speed is not the real aerodynamic top speed of the vehicles.
Manufacturer technical specifications. The power-to-weight ratio is the key physical factor in a drag race.
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 489 hp | Pending |
| Torque | 700 Nm | |
| Weight | 2 385 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Integrale (AWD) | |
| Gearbox | 8-speed tiptronic |
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 424 hp | Dual Permanent Magnet Synchronous Motor |
| Torque | 655 Nm | |
| Weight | 2 040 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Integrale (AWD) | |
| Gearbox | Single-speed fixed gear |
Off the line, the P7 hits 100 km/h in 4.22 s versus 5.15 s for the Q7 SUV. At this point, the P7 leads by 0.94 s and sits roughly 10 m ahead.
At 200 metres, the P7 is doing 147 km/h against 139 km/h for the Q7 SUV. The gap is 0.67 s. The challenger starts to claw back ground.
At 400 metres standing start, the P7 crosses the line in 12.54 s versus 13.41 s. The 0.86 s gap represents roughly 40 m of track - a gap visible to the naked eye.
Past 400 metres, the situation changes. The P7 maxes out at 170 km/h while the Q7 SUV keeps accelerating towards 240 km/h. At 600 metres, the gap has dropped to 0.57 s.
Around 786 metres, both vehicles are level. This is the inversion point: the Q7 SUV overcomes its launch deficit thanks to a 70 km/h higher top speed.
At 1,000 metres, the Q7 SUV finishes in 24.35 s versus 25.24 s. The 0.90 s delta in favour of the Q7 SUV shows that top speed makes a clear difference.
Both rivals are electronically governed, but not at the same level: the Q7 SUV is capped at 240 km/h, the P7 at 170 km/h. This isn’t a physical engine limit - it’s a manufacturer choice, usually for tyre safety or homologation reasons. Neither car reaches its true aerodynamic top speed.
With two plug-in hybrid powertrains, the difference comes down to power-to-weight ratio (4.88 kg/hp vs 4.81 kg/hp) and transmission (Automatic vs Automatic).
In European road use (130 km/h max), both vehicles reach the legal speed limit in under 7.86 seconds. The 0.94 s difference in 0 to 100 km/h is mostly felt in motorway merging and overtaking.
Over 0–100 km/h, P7 wins (4,21 s vs 5,15 s).
Q7 SUV goes from 0 to 100 km/h in 5,15 seconds (calibrated simulation).
Q7 SUV: 489 hp, ratio 4,88 kg/hp. P7: 424 hp, ratio 4,81 kg/hp.
Q7 SUV: 240 km/h. P7: 170 km/h.