Over 0–100 km/h, SQ2 wins (4,94 s vs 5,63 s).
Performance comparison
Simulated drag race 0 → 1,000 m in real time. Synchronised speed counters and stopwatch. Physics calibration on 7 manufacturer measurements.
Simulation
Calibration
Physics model calibrated on manufacturer splits. The limited top speed is not the real aerodynamic top speed of the vehicles.
| SQ2 | F-TYPE P300 | |
|---|---|---|
| 0–100 km/h | 4,94 s−0,68 s | 5,63 s |
| 400 m standing start | 13,47 s−0,22 s | 13,69 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 24,55 s | 24,35 s+0,20 s |
| Top speed (electronically limited) | 257 km/h+7 km/h | 250 km/h |
| Power-to-weight ratio | 5,12 kg/hpbetter ratio | 5,32 kg/hp |
Standing-start drag race, calibrated on manufacturer splits. The gap shows at each stage.
Simulated performance at each stage. Winner in green.
| Palier | SQ2 | F-TYPE P300 |
|---|---|---|
| 0–30 km/h | 1,24 s | 1,61 s |
| 0–50 km/h | 2,07 s | 2,69 s |
| 0–80 km/h | 3,54 s | 4,30 s |
| 0–100 km/h | 4,94 s | 5,63 s |
| 0–120 km/h | 7,19 s | 7,17 stight gap |
| 0–160 km/h | 12,14 s | 11,54 s |
| 0–200 km/h | 19,93 s | 18,21 s |
| 400 m standing start | 13,47 s | 13,69 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 24,55 s | 24,35 s |
| Top speed limited | 257 km/h | 250 km/h |
Manufacturer technical specifications. The power-to-weight ratio is the key physical factor in a drag race.
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 300 hp | Pending |
| Torque | 400 Nm | |
| Weight | 1 535 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Integrale (AWD) | |
| Gearbox | 7-speed S tronic |
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 300 hp | Pending |
| Torque | 400 Nm | |
| Weight | 1 595 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | - | |
| Gearbox | 8-speed automatic ZF |
Off the line, the SQ2 hits 100 km/h in 4.94 s versus 5.63 s for the F-TYPE P300. At this point, the SQ2 leads by 0.68 s and sits roughly 14 m ahead.
At 200 metres, the SQ2 is doing 133 km/h against 140 km/h for the F-TYPE P300. The gap is 0.43 s. The challenger starts to claw back ground.
At 400 metres standing start, the SQ2 crosses the line in 13.47 s versus 13.69 s. The 0.22 s gap represents roughly 11 m of track - two to three car lengths.
Past 400 metres, the situation changes. The F-TYPE P300 maxes out at 250 (i.e. 155 mph - industry threshold) km/h while the SQ2 keeps accelerating towards 257 km/h. At 600 metres, the gap has dropped to 0.07 s.
Around 699 metres, both vehicles are level. This is the inversion point: the F-TYPE P300 overcomes its launch deficit thanks to a 7 km/h higher top speed.
At 1,000 metres, the F-TYPE P300 finishes in 24.35 s versus 24.55 s. The 0.20 s delta shows an extremely tight race.
Electronically capped at 250 (i.e. 155 mph - industry threshold) km/h, the F-TYPE P300 never reaches its natural aerodynamic ceiling in this duel. That’s not a physical limit of the motor - it’s a deliberate manufacturer decision, typically tied to standard-fit tyre ratings or model-range positioning.
With two combustion powertrains, the difference comes down to power-to-weight ratio (5.12 kg/hp vs 5.32 kg/hp) and transmission (Automatic vs Automatic).
In European road use (130 km/h max), both vehicles reach the legal speed limit in under 8.36 seconds. The 0.68 s difference in 0 to 100 km/h is mostly felt in motorway merging and overtaking.
Over 0–100 km/h, SQ2 wins (4,94 s vs 5,63 s).
SQ2 goes from 0 to 100 km/h in 4,94 seconds (calibrated simulation).
SQ2: 300 hp, ratio 5,12 kg/hp. F-TYPE P300: 300 hp, ratio 5,32 kg/hp.
SQ2: 257 km/h. F-TYPE P300: 250 km/h.