Over 0–100 km/h, SQ5 SUV wins (4,42 s vs 5,39 s).
Performance comparison
Simulated drag race 0 → 1,000 m in real time. Synchronised speed counters and stopwatch. Physics calibration on 7 manufacturer measurements.
Simulation
Calibration
Physics model calibrated on manufacturer splits. The limited top speed is not the real aerodynamic top speed of the vehicles.
| SQ5 SUV | Terramar VZ | |
|---|---|---|
| 0–100 km/h | 4,42 s−0,97 s | 5,39 s |
| 400 m standing start | 12,76 s−0,95 s | 13,71 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 23,50 s−1,22 s | 24,72 s |
| Top speed (electronically limited) | 250 km/h | 261 km/h−11 km/h |
| Power-to-weight ratio | 5,56 kg/hpbetter ratio | 5,57 kg/hp |
Standing-start drag race, calibrated on manufacturer splits. The gap shows at each stage.
Simulated performance at each stage. Winner in green.
| Palier | SQ5 SUV | Terramar VZ |
|---|---|---|
| 0–30 km/h | 1,06 s | 1,70 s |
| 0–50 km/h | 1,78 s | 2,50 s |
| 0–80 km/h | 3,15 s | 4,06 s |
| 0–100 km/h | 4,42 s | 5,39 s |
| 0–120 km/h | 6,02 s | 7,20 s |
| 0–160 km/h | 10,50 s | 12,09 s |
| 0–200 km/h | 17,55 s | 19,78 s |
| 400 m standing start | 12,76 s | 13,71 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 23,50 s | 24,72 s |
| Top speed limited | 250 km/h | 261 km/h |
Manufacturer technical specifications. The power-to-weight ratio is the key physical factor in a drag race.
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 367 hp | Pending |
| Torque | 550 Nm | |
| Weight | 2 040 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Integrale (AWD) | |
| Gearbox | 7-speed S tronic |
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 300 hp | Pending |
| Torque | 400 Nm | |
| Weight | 1 670 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Integrale (AWD) | |
| Gearbox | 7-speed DSG |
Off the line, the SQ5 SUV hits 100 km/h in 4.42 s versus 5.39 s for the Terramar VZ. At this point, the SQ5 SUV leads by 0.97 s and sits roughly 17 m ahead.
At 200 metres, the SQ5 SUV is doing 142 km/h against 138 km/h for the Terramar VZ. The gap is 0.81 s. The challenger starts to claw back ground.
At 400 metres standing start, the SQ5 SUV crosses the line in 12.76 s versus 13.70 s. The 0.95 s gap represents roughly 44 m of track - a gap visible to the naked eye.
Past 400 metres, the SQ5 SUV continues to build its lead. At 600 metres, it runs at 196 km/h versus 191 km/h. At 1,000 metres, the SQ5 SUV finishes in 23.50 s versus 24.72 s, with a 1.22 s lead. Both vehicles have similar top speeds (250 (i.e. 155 mph - industry threshold) vs 261 km/h), preventing any comeback.
Electronically capped at 250 (i.e. 155 mph - industry threshold) km/h, the SQ5 SUV never reaches its natural aerodynamic ceiling in this duel. That’s not a physical limit of the motor - it’s a deliberate manufacturer decision, typically tied to standard-fit tyre ratings or model-range positioning.
With two combustion powertrains, the difference comes down to power-to-weight ratio (5.56 kg/hp vs 5.57 kg/hp) and transmission (Automatic vs Automatic).
In European road use (130 km/h max), both vehicles reach the legal speed limit in under 8.18 seconds. The 0.97 s difference in 0 to 100 km/h is mostly felt in motorway merging and overtaking.
Swap one of the two models to explore an equivalent duel in the same segment.
Over 0–100 km/h, SQ5 SUV wins (4,42 s vs 5,39 s).
SQ5 SUV goes from 0 to 100 km/h in 4,42 seconds (calibrated simulation).
SQ5 SUV: 367 hp, ratio 5,56 kg/hp. Terramar VZ: 300 hp, ratio 5,57 kg/hp.
SQ5 SUV: 250 km/h. Terramar VZ: 261 km/h.