Sur 0–100 km/h, SQ6 SUV e-tron gagne (4,37 s vs 4,37 s).
Performance comparison
Simulated drag race 0 → 1,000 m in real time. Synchronised speed counters and stopwatch. Physics calibration on 7 manufacturer measurements.
Simulation
Calibration
Physics model calibrated on manufacturer splits. The limited top speed is not the real aerodynamic top speed of the vehicles.
| SQ6 Sportback e-tron | SQ6 SUV e-tron | |
|---|---|---|
| 0–100 km/h | 4,37 s | 4,37 s+0,00 s |
| 400 m standing start | 12,68 s−0,02 s | 12,70 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 23,17 s−0,12 s | 23,29 s |
| Top speed (electronically limited) | 230 km/h | 230 km/h |
| Power-to-weight ratio | 4,76 kg/hp | 4,76 kg/hp |
Standing-start drag race, calibrated on manufacturer splits. The gap shows at each stage.
Simulated performance at each stage. Winner in green.
| Palier | SQ6 Sportback e-tron | SQ6 SUV e-tron |
|---|---|---|
| 0–30 km/h | 1,16 s | 1,16 s |
| 0–50 km/h | 1,94 s | 1,93 stight gap |
| 0–80 km/h | 3,21 s | 3,21 stight gap |
| 0–100 km/h | 4,37 s | 4,37 s |
| 0–120 km/h | 5,83 s | 5,84 stight gap |
| 0–160 km/h | 10,08 s | 10,17 stight gap |
| 0–200 km/h | 16,48 s | 16,87 s |
| 400 m standing start | 12,68 s | 12,70 stight gap |
| 1,000 m standing start | 23,17 s | 23,29 stight gap |
| Top speed | 230 km/h | 230 km/h |
Manufacturer technical specifications. The power-to-weight ratio is the key physical factor in a drag race.
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 509 hp | Pending |
| Torque | 855 Nm | |
| Weight | 2 425 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Integrale (AWD) | |
| Gearbox | Unknown |
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 509 hp | Pending |
| Torque | 855 Nm | |
| Weight | 2 425 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Integrale (AWD) | |
| Gearbox | Unknown |
Off the line, the SQ6 Sportback e-tron hits 100 km/h in 4.37 s versus 4.37 s for the SQ6 SUV e-tron. The 0.00 s gap is negligible: both vehicles are neck and neck.
At 200 metres, the SQ6 Sportback e-tron is doing 145 km/h against 144 km/h for the SQ6 SUV e-tron. The gap is 0.00 s. The gap remains stable from the start.
At 400 metres standing start, the SQ6 Sportback e-tron crosses the line in 12.68 s versus 12.70 s. The 0.02 s gap represents roughly 1 m of track
Past 400 metres, nothing changes. Same ceiling, same acceleration, same trajectory — both rivals run in formation to the line. The 0.12 s gap at 1,000 metres confirms what the specs already suggested: on track, they’re interchangeable. The real contest happens elsewhere — range, comfort, charging network reliability.
Both rivals share the same electronic speed cap: the SQ6 Sportback e-tron and the SQ6 SUV e-tron are governed to 230 km/h. At that speed, standard-fit tyres approach their safety threshold — an industrial ceiling common to most electric vehicles in this segment. Neither car shows its true aerodynamic potential in this duel.
With two electric powertrains, the difference comes down to power-to-weight ratio (4.76 kg/hp vs 4.76 kg/hp) and transmission (Unknown vs Unknown).
In European road use (130 km/h max), both vehicles reach the legal speed limit in under 6.73 seconds. The 0.00 s difference in 0 to 100 km/h is mostly felt in motorway merging and overtaking.
Swap one of the two models to explore an equivalent duel in the same segment.
Sur 0–100 km/h, SQ6 SUV e-tron gagne (4,37 s vs 4,37 s).
SQ6 Sportback e-tron passe de 0 à 100 km/h en 4,37 secondes (simulation calibrée).
SQ6 Sportback e-tron : 509 hp, ratio 4,76 kg/hp. SQ6 SUV e-tron : 509 hp, ratio 4,76 kg/hp.
SQ6 Sportback e-tron : 230 km/h. SQ6 SUV e-tron : 230 km/h.