Over 0–100 km/h, A110 GT 300 wins (3,92 s vs 4,37 s).
Performance comparison
Simulated drag race 0 → 1,000 m in real time. Synchronised speed counters and stopwatch. Physics calibration on 7 manufacturer measurements.
Simulation
Calibration
Physics model calibrated on manufacturer splits. The limited top speed is not the real aerodynamic top speed of the vehicles.
| SQ6 SUV e-tron | A110 GT 300 | |
|---|---|---|
| 0–100 km/h | 4,37 s | 3,92 s+0,45 s |
| 400 m standing start | 12,70 s | 11,97 s+0,73 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 23,29 s | 21,76 s+1,53 s |
| Top speed (electronically limited) | 230 km/h | 272 km/h−42 km/h |
| Power-to-weight ratio | 4,76 kg/hp | 3,65 kg/hpbetter ratio |
Standing-start drag race, calibrated on manufacturer splits. The gap shows at each stage.
Simulated performance at each stage. Winner in green.
| Palier | SQ6 SUV e-tron | A110 GT 300 |
|---|---|---|
| 0–30 km/h | 1,16 s | 1,13 stight gap |
| 0–50 km/h | 1,93 s | 1,89 stight gap |
| 0–80 km/h | 3,21 s | 3,06 stight gap |
| 0–100 km/h | 4,37 s | 3,92 s |
| 0–120 km/h | 5,84 s | 5,15 s |
| 0–160 km/h | 10,17 s | 8,21 s |
| 0–200 km/h | 16,87 s | 12,68 s |
| 400 m standing start | 12,70 s | 11,97 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 23,29 s | 21,76 s |
| Top speed | 230 km/h | 272 km/h |
Manufacturer technical specifications. The power-to-weight ratio is the key physical factor in a drag race.
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 509 hp | Pending |
| Torque | 855 Nm | |
| Weight | 2 425 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Integrale (AWD) | |
| Gearbox | Unknown |
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 305 hp | Pending |
| Torque | 340 Nm | |
| Weight | 1 114 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | - | |
| Gearbox | 7-speed dual-clutch |
Off the line, the A110 GT 300 hits 100 km/h in 3.92 s versus 4.37 s for the SQ6 SUV e-tron. Despite lacking instant torque, 305 hp of power compensates. At this point, the A110 GT 300 leads by 0.45 s and sits roughly 2 m ahead.
At 200 metres, the A110 GT 300 is doing 157 km/h against 144 km/h for the SQ6 SUV e-tron. The gap is 0.36 s. The gap remains stable from the start.
At 400 metres standing start, the A110 GT 300 crosses the line in 11.96 s versus 12.70 s. The 0.73 s gap represents roughly 36 m of track - a gap visible to the naked eye.
Past 400 metres, the A110 GT 300 continues to build its lead. At 600 metres, it runs at 215 km/h versus 198 km/h. At 1,000 metres, the A110 GT 300 finishes in 21.76 s versus 23.29 s, with a 1.53 s lead.
Electronically capped at 230 km/h, the SQ6 SUV e-tron never reaches its natural aerodynamic ceiling in this duel. That’s not a physical limit of the motor - it’s a deliberate manufacturer decision, typically tied to standard-fit tyre ratings or model-range positioning.
Instant electric torque gives an advantage off the line. The higher top speed of the combustion engine gives an advantage over longer distances. The distance at which one catches the other depends on the top speed differential.
In European road use (130 km/h max), both vehicles reach the legal speed limit in under 6.73 seconds. The 0.45 s difference in 0 to 100 km/h is mostly felt in motorway merging and overtaking.
Over 0–100 km/h, A110 GT 300 wins (3,92 s vs 4,37 s).
SQ6 SUV e-tron goes from 0 to 100 km/h in 4,37 seconds (calibrated simulation).
SQ6 SUV e-tron: 509 hp, ratio 4,76 kg/hp. A110 GT 300: 305 hp, ratio 3,65 kg/hp.
SQ6 SUV e-tron: 230 km/h. A110 GT 300: 272 km/h.