Over 0–100 km/h, SQ6 SUV e-tron wins (4,37 s vs 4,67 s).
Simulated drag race 0 → 1,000 m in real time. Synchronised speed counters and stopwatch. Physics calibration on 7 manufacturer measurements.
| Measure | SQ6 SUV e-tron | M240i F44 | Gap |
|---|---|---|---|
| 0–100 km/h | 4.37 s | 4.67 s | 0.30 s · SQ6 SUV e-tron |
| 400 m standing start | 12.70 s | 12.78 s | 0.08 s · SQ6 SUV e-tron |
| 1,000 m standing start | 23.29 s | 23.04 s | 0.25 s · M240i F44 |
| Top speed (electronically limited) | 230 km/h | 250 km/h | 20 km/h · M240i F44 |
| Power-to-weight ratio | 4.76 kg/hp | 4.49 kg/hp | better ratio · M240i F44 |
Standing-start drag race, calibrated on manufacturer splits. The gap shows at each stage.
| Stage | SQ6 SUV e-tron | M240i F44 |
|---|---|---|
| 0–30 km/h | 1.16 s | 1.33 s |
| 0–50 km/h | 1.93 s | 2.21 s |
| 0–80 km/h | 3.21 s | 3.53 s |
| 0–100 km/h | 4.37 s | 4.67 s |
| 0–120 km/h | 5.84 s | 6.03 s |
| 0–160 km/h | 10.17 s | 9.80 s |
| 0–200 km/h | 16.87 s | 15.53 s |
| 400 m standing start | 12.70 s · tight gap | 12.78 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 23.29 s | 23.04 s |
| Top speed limited | 230 km/h | 250 km/h |
Physics model calibrated on manufacturer splits. The limited top speed is not the real aerodynamic top speed of the vehicles.
Manufacturer technical specifications. The power-to-weight ratio is the key physical factor in a drag race.
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 509 hp | Pending |
| Torque | 855 Nm | |
| Weight | 2 425 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Integrale (AWD) | |
| Gearbox | Unknown |
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 340 hp | Pending |
| Torque | 500 Nm | |
| Weight | 1 525 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | - | |
| Gearbox | 8-speed Steptronic Sport transmission |
Off the line, the SQ6 SUV e-tron hits 100 km/h in 4.37 s versus 4.67 s for the M240i. The instant torque of 855 Nm from the electric motor makes the difference. At this point, the SQ6 SUV e-tron leads by 0.30 s and sits roughly 6 m ahead.
At 200 metres, the SQ6 SUV e-tron is doing 144 km/h against 147 km/h for the M240i. The gap is 0.20 s. The gap remains stable from the start.
At 400 metres standing start, the SQ6 SUV e-tron crosses the line in 12.70 s versus 12.78 s. The 0.08 s gap represents roughly 4 m of track - barely a car length.
Past 400 metres, the situation changes. The SQ6 SUV e-tron maxes out at 230 km/h while the M240i keeps accelerating towards 250 (i.e. 155 mph - industry threshold) km/h. At 600 metres, the gap has dropped to 0.04 s.
Around 528 metres, both vehicles are level. This is the inversion point: the M240i overcomes its launch deficit thanks to a 20 km/h higher top speed.
At 1,000 metres, the M240i finishes in 23.03 s versus 23.29 s. The 0.25 s delta shows an extremely tight race.
Both rivals are electronically governed, but not at the same level: the SQ6 SUV e-tron is capped at 230 km/h, the M240i at 250 (i.e. 155 mph - industry threshold) km/h. This isn’t a physical engine limit - it’s a manufacturer choice, usually for tyre safety or homologation reasons. Neither car reaches its true aerodynamic top speed.
Instant electric torque gives an advantage off the line. The higher top speed of the combustion engine gives an advantage over longer distances. The distance at which one catches the other depends on the top speed differential.
In European road use (130 km/h max), both vehicles reach the legal speed limit in under 6.84 seconds. The 0.30 s difference in 0 to 100 km/h is mostly felt in motorway merging and overtaking.
Over 0–100 km/h, SQ6 SUV e-tron wins (4,37 s vs 4,67 s).
SQ6 SUV e-tron goes from 0 to 100 km/h in 4,37 seconds (calibrated simulation).
SQ6 SUV e-tron: 509 hp, ratio 4,76 kg/hp. M240i F44: 340 hp, ratio 4,49 kg/hp.
SQ6 SUV e-tron: 230 km/h. M240i F44: 250 km/h.