Over 0–100 km/h, SQ6 SUV e-tron and Cayenne GTS E3.1 are neck and neck (4,37 s vs 4,37 s, no significant gap).
Performance comparison
Simulated drag race 0 → 1,000 m in real time. Synchronised speed counters and stopwatch. Physics calibration on 7 manufacturer measurements.
Simulation
Calibration
Physics model calibrated on manufacturer splits. The limited top speed is not the real aerodynamic top speed of the vehicles.
| SQ6 SUV e-tron | Cayenne GTS E3.1 | |
|---|---|---|
| 0–100 km/h | 4,37 s−0,00 s | 4,37 s |
| 400 m standing start | 12,70 s | 12,66 s+0,04 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 23,29 s−0,09 s | 23,38 s |
| Top speed (electronically limited) | 230 km/h | 266 km/h−36 km/h |
| Power-to-weight ratio | 4,76 kg/hpbetter ratio | 4,88 kg/hp |
Standing-start drag race, calibrated on manufacturer splits. The gap shows at each stage.
Simulated performance at each stage. Winner in green.
| Palier | SQ6 SUV e-tron | Cayenne GTS E3.1 |
|---|---|---|
| 0–30 km/h | 1,16 s | 0,93 s |
| 0–50 km/h | 1,93 s | 1,57 s |
| 0–80 km/h | 3,21 s | 3,00 s |
| 0–100 km/h | 4,37 s | 4,37 stight gap |
| 0–120 km/h | 5,84 s | 5,94 stight gap |
| 0–160 km/h | 10,17 s | 10,45 s |
| 0–200 km/h | 16,87 s | 17,24 s |
| 400 m standing start | 12,70 s | 12,66 stight gap |
| 1,000 m standing start | 23,29 s | 23,38 stight gap |
| Top speed | 230 km/h | 266 km/h |
Manufacturer technical specifications. The power-to-weight ratio is the key physical factor in a drag race.
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 509 hp | Pending |
| Torque | 855 Nm | |
| Weight | 2 425 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Integrale (AWD) | |
| Gearbox | Unknown |
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 460 hp | V8 |
| Torque | 600 Nm | |
| Weight | 2 247 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Integrale (AWD) | |
| Gearbox | TORQUE_CONVERTER |
Off the line, the SQ6 SUV e-tron hits 100 km/h in 4.37 s versus 4.37 s for the Cayenne GTS. The instant torque of 855 Nm from the electric motor makes the difference. The 0.00 s gap is negligible: both vehicles are neck and neck.
At 200 metres, the Cayenne GTS is doing 142 km/h against 144 km/h for the SQ6 SUV e-tron. The gap is 0.10 s. The gap widens compared to the 0-100.
At 400 metres standing start, the Cayenne GTS crosses the line in 12.66 s versus 12.70 s. The 0.04 s gap represents roughly 2 m of track
Past 400 metres, the situation changes. The SQ6 SUV e-tron maxes out at 230 km/h while the Cayenne GTS keeps accelerating towards 266 km/h. At 600 metres, the gap has dropped to 0.00 s.
Around 625 metres, both vehicles are level. This is the inversion point: the SQ6 SUV e-tron overcomes its launch deficit thanks to a 36 km/h higher top speed.
At 1,000 metres, the SQ6 SUV e-tron finishes in 23.29 s versus 23.37 s. The 0.08 s delta shows an extremely tight race.
Both rivals are electronically governed, but not at the same level: the SQ6 SUV e-tron is capped at 230 km/h, the Cayenne GTS at 270 km/h. This isn’t a physical engine limit - it’s a manufacturer choice, usually for tyre safety or homologation reasons. Neither car reaches its true aerodynamic top speed.
Instant electric torque gives an advantage off the line. The higher top speed of the combustion engine gives an advantage over longer distances. The distance at which one catches the other depends on the top speed differential.
In European road use (130 km/h max), both vehicles reach the legal speed limit in under 6.93 seconds. The 0.00 s difference in 0 to 100 km/h is mostly felt in motorway merging and overtaking.
Swap one of the two models to explore an equivalent duel in the same segment.
Over 0–100 km/h, SQ6 SUV e-tron and Cayenne GTS E3.1 are neck and neck (4,37 s vs 4,37 s, no significant gap).
SQ6 SUV e-tron goes from 0 to 100 km/h in 4,37 seconds (calibrated simulation).
SQ6 SUV e-tron: 509 hp, ratio 4,76 kg/hp. Cayenne GTS E3.1: 460 hp, ratio 4,88 kg/hp.
SQ6 SUV e-tron: 230 km/h. Cayenne GTS E3.1: 266 km/h.