Skip to main content
CaralogyCaralogy
HomeBrandsRoad TripBudgetDuelGuides
Caralogy

The car comparison platform. Physics simulation, road trips, real costs.

Navigation
All brandsCar duelRunning costsMotorwayMethodology
Simulators
Motorway simulatorRunning costsPerformance duel
Brands
VolkswagenBMWMercedesToyotaTeslaAudi
FRENDEESIT
© 2026 Caralogy · All rights reserved
  1. Home
  2. /Duel
  3. /Sedans
Ai4BEVvsBJohnPetrol
  • MotorwayMotorwayRange and charging
  • PerformancePerformance0-100, top speed
  • ConsumptionConsumptionYearly cost
  • Specsi4 · John

BMW i4 eDrive35 G26 vs MINI John Cooper Works FWD: which is truly faster?

Simulated drag race 0 → 1,000 m in real time. Synchronised speed counters and stopwatch. Physics calibration on 7 manufacturer measurements.

saloon · 2024 vs 2019 · Methodology
BMWBEVFaster

i4 eDrive35 G26

286 hp · 400 Nm · 2,000 kg · 2024

VS
MINIPetrol

John Cooper Works FWD

231 hp · 320 Nm · 1,175 kg · 2019

Result · 0–100 km/h

ABMW i4 eDrive35 G26

6.08 s

Gap0.13 sin favour of i4 eDrive35
BMINI John Cooper Works FWD

6.21 s

Summary · Caralogy simulation
Measurei4 eDrive35 G26John Cooper Works FWDGap
0–100 km/h6.08 s6.21 s0.13 s · i4 eDrive35 G26
400 m standing start14.38 s14.26 s0.12 s · John Cooper Works FWD
1,000 m standing start26.26 s25.30 s0.96 s · John Cooper Works FWD
Top speed (electronically limited)190 km/h251 km/h61 km/h · John Cooper Works FWD
Power-to-weight ratio6.99 kg/hp5.09 kg/hpbetter ratio · John Cooper Works FWD

Watch the race

Standing-start drag race, calibrated on manufacturer splits. The gap shows at each stage.

BMWBEVi4 eDrive35 G26
Speed
0km/h
Timer
0,00s
Distance
0m
MINIPetrolJohn Cooper Works FWD
Speed
0km/h
Timer
0,00s
Distance
0m
100 m
200 m
300 m
400 m
500 m
600 m
700 m
800 m
900 m
1000 m
0m → 1000m
Gap0m

Stage-by-stage comparison

Simulated performance at each stage. Best value in bold.
Stagei4 eDrive35 G26John Cooper Works FWD
0–30 km/h1.69 s1.85 s
0–50 km/h2.81 s3.09 s
0–80 km/h4.56 s4.95 s
0–100 km/h6.08 s · tight gap6.21 s
0–120 km/h8.04 s7.93 s · tight gap
0–160 km/h14.28 s12.59 s
0–200 km/h-20.51 s
400 m standing start14.38 s14.26 s · tight gap
1,000 m standing start26.26 s25.30 s
Top speed190 km/h251 km/h

Parameters and assumptions

Simulation

Start
Standing, straight line
Surface
Dry asphalt, 23°C
Wind
None
Driver
1 person, 75 kg

Calibration

Splits
0–100, 0–200 manufacturer
Power curve
Real measurement (Caralogy)
VMax
Manufacturer limited
Transmission
Losses integrated in model

Physics model calibrated on manufacturer splits. The limited top speed is not the real aerodynamic top speed of the vehicles.

Under the bonnet

Manufacturer technical specifications. The power-to-weight ratio is the key physical factor in a drag race.

BMW

i4 eDrive35 G26

6,99kg/hpcompensated by −825 kg
CharacteristicValueDetail
Power286 hpPending
Torque400 Nm
Weight2 000 kgmanufacturer kerb weight
Drivetrain-
GearboxAutomatic transmission, single-speed with fixed ratio
MINI

John Cooper Works FWD

5,09kg/hpratio better by 1,91 kg/hp
CharacteristicValueDetail
Power231 hpPending
Torque320 Nm
Weight1 175 kgmanufacturer kerb weight
DrivetrainTraction
Gearbox8-speed automatic

The start: 0 to 100 km/h

Off the line, the i4 eDrive35 hits 100 km/h in 6.08 s versus 6.21 s for the John Cooper Works FWD. The instant torque of 400 Nm from the electric motor makes the difference. At this point, the i4 eDrive35 leads by 0.13 s and sits roughly 6 m ahead.

From 100 km/h to 400 metres

At 200 metres, the i4 eDrive35 is doing 131 km/h against 137 km/h for the John Cooper Works FWD. The gap is 0.13 s. The gap remains stable from the start.

At 400 metres standing start, the John Cooper Works FWD crosses the line in 14.26 s versus 14.38 s. The 0.12 s gap represents roughly 5 m of track - barely a car length.

Beyond 400 metres: top speed comes into play

Past 400 metres, the John Cooper Works FWD continues to build its lead. At 600 metres, it runs at 191 km/h versus 179 km/h. At 1,000 metres, the John Cooper Works FWD finishes in 25.29 s versus 26.26 s, with a 0.97 s lead.

What the numbers don’t tell you

Electronically capped at 190 km/h, the i4 eDrive35 never reaches its natural aerodynamic ceiling in this duel. That’s not a physical limit of the motor - it’s a deliberate manufacturer decision, typically tied to standard-fit tyre ratings or model-range positioning.

Instant electric torque gives an advantage off the line. The higher top speed of the combustion engine gives an advantage over longer distances. The distance at which one catches the other depends on the top speed differential.

In European road use (130 km/h max), both vehicles reach the legal speed limit in under 9.27 seconds. The 0.13 s difference in 0 to 100 km/h is mostly felt in motorway merging and overtaking.

Other duels you might be interested in

BMWVSTesla

i4 eDrive35 vs Model 3 RWD

MINIVSRenault

John Cooper Works FWD vs Clio 4 RS Trophy 220

BMWVSTesla

i4 eDrive35 vs Model 3 Long Range RWD

MINIVSToyota

John Cooper Works FWD vs Yaris GRMN

Frequently asked questions

Over 0–100 km/h, i4 eDrive35 G26 wins (6,08 s vs 6,21 s).

i4 eDrive35 G26 goes from 0 to 100 km/h in 6,08 seconds (calibrated simulation).

i4 eDrive35 G26: 286 hp, ratio 6,99 kg/hp. John Cooper Works FWD: 231 hp, ratio 5,09 kg/hp.

i4 eDrive35 G26: 190 km/h. John Cooper Works FWD: 251 km/h.