Sur 0–100 km/h, X1 xDrive25e F48 gagne (6,84 s vs 7,58 s).
Performance comparison
Simulated drag race 0 → 1,000 m in real time. Synchronised speed counters and stopwatch. Physics calibration on 7 manufacturer measurements.
Simulation
Calibration
Physics model calibrated on manufacturer splits. The limited top speed is not the real aerodynamic top speed of the vehicles.
| X1 xDrive25e F48 | Compass 4xe | |
|---|---|---|
| 0–100 km/h | 6,84 s−0,74 s | 7,58 s |
| 400 m standing start | 14,99 s−0,63 s | 15,62 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 27,59 s−1,29 s | 28,88 s |
| Top speed (electronically limited) | 193 km/h | 200 km/h−7 km/h |
| Power-to-weight ratio | 7,93 kg/hpbetter ratio | 9,56 kg/hp |
Standing-start drag race, calibrated on manufacturer splits. The gap shows at each stage.
Simulated performance at each stage. Winner in green.
| Palier | X1 xDrive25e F48 | Compass 4xe |
|---|---|---|
| 0–30 km/h | 1,45 s | 1,62 s |
| 0–50 km/h | 2,49 s | 2,72 s |
| 0–80 km/h | 4,75 s | 5,25 s |
| 0–100 km/h | 6,84 s | 7,58 s |
| 0–120 km/h | 9,57 s | 10,77 s |
| 0–160 km/h | 17,61 s | 20,78 s |
| 0–200 km/h | — | 50,50 s |
| 400 m standing start | 14,99 s | 15,62 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 27,59 s | 28,88 s |
| Top speed | 193 km/h | 200 km/h |
Manufacturer technical specifications. The power-to-weight ratio is the key physical factor in a drag race.
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 220 hp | Pending |
| Torque | 385 Nm | |
| Weight | 1 745 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Integrale (AWD) | |
| Gearbox | 6-speed Steptronic |
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 190 hp | Pending |
| Torque | 400 Nm | |
| Weight | 1 817 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Compass 4xe 2023 | |
| Gearbox | 6-speed automatic |
Off the line, the Bmw X1 xDrive25e hits 100 km/h in 6.84 s versus 7.58 s for the Compass 4xe. At this point, the Bmw X1 xDrive25e leads by 0.74 s and sits roughly 8 m ahead.
At 200 metres, the Bmw X1 xDrive25e is doing 121 km/h against 116 km/h for the Compass 4xe. The gap is 0.41 s. The challenger starts to claw back ground.
At 400 metres standing start, the Bmw X1 xDrive25e crosses the line in 14.99 s versus 15.62 s. The 0.63 s gap represents roughly 25 m of track — two to three car lengths.
Past 400 metres, the Bmw X1 xDrive25e continues to build its lead. At 600 metres, it runs at 167 km/h versus 159 km/h. At 1,000 metres, the Bmw X1 xDrive25e finishes in 27.59 s versus 28.87 s, with a 1.29 s lead. Both vehicles have similar top speeds (193 vs 200 km/h), preventing any comeback.
Both rivals are electronically governed, but not at the same level: the Bmw X1 xDrive25e is capped at 193 km/h, the Compass 4xe at 200 km/h. This isn’t a physical engine limit — it’s a manufacturer choice, usually for tyre safety or homologation reasons. Neither car reaches its true aerodynamic top speed.
With two plug-in hybrid powertrains, the difference comes down to power-to-weight ratio (7.93 kg/hp vs 9.56 kg/hp) and transmission (Automatic vs Automatic).
In European road use (130 km/h max), both vehicles reach the legal speed limit in under 12.66 seconds. The 0.74 s difference in 0 to 100 km/h is mostly felt in motorway merging and overtaking.
Swap one of the two models to explore an equivalent duel in the same segment.
Sur 0–100 km/h, X1 xDrive25e F48 gagne (6,84 s vs 7,58 s).
X1 xDrive25e F48 passe de 0 à 100 km/h en 6,84 secondes (simulation calibrée).
X1 xDrive25e F48 : 220 hp, ratio 7,93 kg/hp. Compass 4xe : 190 hp, ratio 9,56 kg/hp.
X1 xDrive25e F48 : 193 km/h. Compass 4xe : 200 km/h.